| Thread Closed |
subtle background structure in deep astronomy photos; CSL-1 cosmic string gravitational lens in Capodimonte Deep Field; Millennium Simulation of evolving cosmic structure; AstroDeep group; Murray mesh; www.Flickr.com evolving cosmic structure; As |
Share Thread |
| Oct11-06, 03:21 PM | #1 |
|
|
subtle background structure in deep astronomy photos; CSL-1 cosmic string gravitational lens in Capodimonte Deep Field; Millennium Simulation of evolving cosmic structure; AstroDeep group; Murray mesh; www.Flickr.com evolving cosmic structure; As
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/11 subtle background
structure in deep astronomy photos; CSL-1 cosmic string gravitational lens in Capodimonte Deep Field; Millennium Simulation of evolving cosmic structure; AstroDeep group; Murray mesh; www.Flickr.com Rich Murray, MA Room For All rmforall@comcast.net 505-501-2298 1943 Otowi Road Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 USA http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/ AstroDeep@yahoogroups.com This group was started 2002.01.19, and allows sharing and discussion of 100KB jpg photos. A new AstroDeep group is available on Flickr.com to share png photos, up to 5 to 10 MB size, with many sizes viewable of each photo. http://www.flickr.com/groups/97329064@N00/ About AstroDeep: Share and discuss ultra deep sky astronomy photos, up to 5 MB each, that show mysterious, fascinating, and unexplained subtle background structure: appears to be a very distant 3D fractile tangle of dark and light spots, threads, and lines, behind all galaxies, which I named 'Murray mesh' in January 2002. I'd like a self-organizing community of people to evolve to enjoy and study this wonder in the spirit of free, civil, open-minded scientific sharing, serious, playful, and aesthetic, and including professionals as well as amateurs. Skeptical assessments are welcome, in case the subtle features are artifacts of instrumentation, processing, or perception. My goal as the initial catalytic facilitator is to provide quality high resolution images with commentary on my methods, findings, and questions so far, to be as inclusive as possible, and support a variety of participants and co-leaders, keeping everything in the free public domain. AstroDeep will demonstrate an innovative way of creating a new kind of scientific community. This is a public group. For your photos page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rmforall/ For your profile: http://www.flickr.com/people/rmforall/ Following are 17 deep cosmic images from the OACDF2 field of the Capodimonte Deep Field, and 2 images from the recent Millennium Simulation of the evolution of cosmic structure. For each image, click on the second URL to view the image. If you join ( immediate signup ) as a Free member, you will be able to leave comments on the photos, and join our AstroDeep group to share all our relevant photos and discussions. http://www.flickr.com/photos/68744821@N00/15220099/ astroOACDF215d01ddaab http://photos9.flickr.com/15220099_db4a804187_b.jpg [ To take full advantage of Flickr, you should use a JavaScript-enabled browser and install the latest version of the Macromedia Flash Player. ] #1 In the center is CSL-1, the orange exact double image, dumbbell shape, 4 arc-seconds wide, of a galaxy 6 billion light years away, caused by the gravitational lens effect of a closer, extremely thin and incredibly dense, yet invisible, cosmic string -- the first convincing evidence. This 3.3 X 2.4 arc-minute selection is from the lower right edge of the ESO public domain press photo April 10 2001 of a 35 X 32' view of the quarter field OACDF2 [ about 0.5 by 0.5 degrees -- the width of the Moon ] in three color bands from the Capodimonte Deep Field, which has three other adjacent quarter fields -- not in the public domain as far as I know. [ png 1654 X 1029 pixels 2.15 MB ] North is up, while East is to the left. I have shifted and lightened the colors to bring out the subtle structures in the background, which since January 2002 I call 'Murray mesh' -- short tangled dark threads and spots, and longer, brighter, less tangled threads, and other subtle features. They may be very distant cosmic filaments of H and He and early galaxies, and also result from various kinds of gravitational lenses. http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-re...hot-15-01.html people.na.infn.it/~longo/Ricerca/Cosmic_strings/Materiali... 38 page review by Giuseppe Longo on April 15 2005 www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galform/millennium/ Millennium Simulation? See #18 and #19 for computed early cosmic structures. I am fascinated by the diverse and subtle features in the background. The larger, nearer stars have crossbars and a disk of added light from diffraction effects in the telescope. The myriad galaxies are fuzzy disks, ovals, edge on disks, and irregular shapes, and, on the average, the smaller and redder they are, the more distant. Some of the red color comes from absorption by intergalactic dust, but most is from the red shift -- CSL-1 has a red shift z = 0.46, so much of its light in the red R band, magnitude 19.67 +-.20, is from near infrared light downshifted into visible red light. The many tinier and tinier reddish fuzzy objects are, on average, similar galaxies, more and more far away, while larger and whiter fuzzy objects are, on average, similar galaxies that are closer than CSL-1. So we are gazing down, down, down into a fathomless well of space and time. But the luminous green background, presumably far more distant than the tiniest galaxies, seems to have subtle texture, structure, and local features. If we imagine a clock face at CSL-1 to show directions, then at 7:30 at 7 widths of CSL-1 distance, 28 sec, we find a tangled cluster, 8 sec wide, of small, irregular dark spots and lines, which seem to be a dense mesh that includes less dark lines and lighter lines. Click on All Sizes to see the Large and the even larger Original -- the file I uploaded. At first, the dark spots and tangled darker lines always seem to be behind all lighter features. But it's difficult to assess such complex, unfamiliar, fractile three dimensional meshes. If we look at 4:00 to 5:00 clock direction, 2 to 4 widths of CSL-1, 4-8 sec, we see a few longer, thinner, curved, much lighter lines -- and we may see everywhere complex meshes of tangled lighter lines, interwoven with the darker lines. If we gaze at 3:00 nine widths, 36 sec, we find a bright star, and two widths to its right, a tiny light fuzzy spot that expands upward to define a curved fan shape, barely visible, yet persistent, about 4 widths high and wide, 8 sec. We can discern this fan shape in the Large and Original views. Some of the lighter lines often seem to be boundaries of these subtle, fairly transparent features, like oil floating on water. Practice developes subtle visual skills, like learning to instantly recognize the subtle impressions of animal feet in a field of wild grass. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...ACDF215d01ddaa http://photos13.flickr.com/15408839_101e3ea875_b.jpg #2 CSL-1 and two other cosmic string gravitational lens candidates, the irregular orange galaxies at low center, upper left, and upper right corner. 1654 X 1655 pixels, 3.3 X 3.3' size png 3.43 MB The coordinates of CSL-1 are: 12 h 23 m 30.6 s Right Ascension, -12 degrees 38 m 57 s Declination. Three wavelength bands from 773 to 913 nanometers: Blue, Violet, Red. One pixel in the original data is 0.238 arc-sec. From the ESO.org site, I downloaded ESO PR Photo 15d/01, Hi-Res JPEG 2768 X 3668 pixels 6.2 MB 5.5 X 6.5 arc-minutes At first, I couldn't find much detail in their jpg image. I used an excellent low cost image processing program, MGI PhotoSuite 4.0, to crop off the text on the bottom, leaving the image 2768 X 3136 p 5.5 X 6 min. The Touchup feature next: Soften: reduced from 3 to 0, as I wanted to maximize the raw detail. Color Adjustment: Cyan-Red -50 Magenta-Green +100 Yellow-Blue -100, as empirically this created a pleasing, easy to view image with maximum detail. Brightness: increased from 0 to 30, to increase the dark background details. Gamma: reduced from 1.00 to 0.80 to increase the dark background details. Saved as a Windows Bit Map bmp 24.8 MB Crop: reduce to 1654 X 1655 p Saved as bmp 7.83 MB. Saved as Personal Network Graphic png 3.83 MB and Uploaded to Flickr. Crop: reduce to 1654 X 1029 p Saved as bmp 4.87 MB png 2.15 MB and uploaded the png to Flickr as #1 , as Flickr can upload only png and jgp, and I find jpg loses too much fine detail. How I get into this fascination..... RTM: deep sky background filaments: images and interpretation 1.19.2 rmforall groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/1 photos.groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/lst?.dir=/&.v... Click on the thumbnail photos to get the photos, and click on those in turn to get full screen photos. Artifacts? Or?-- immense filaments of H, He, and dark matter, lit by intense UV from the earliest very massive stars, "...during the first 10E8 years of the history of the universe at redshifts between 50 and 10...," Prof. Richard B. Larson, Sci. Am. Dec 2001, and www.astro.yale.edu/larson/papers/Noordwijk99.pdf [7 pages]. This very early intense UV is now redshifted into the visible and IR bands, and may supply about half of the current cosmic IR background. The filaments are generally as thin as 1 pixel. Photo #2: deeptt1k.jpg: One pixel = .258 arc-sec, about .25 mm on my 15" monitor. In MGI PhotoSuite 4.0, I can zoom in to 1600 %, at which point each pixel is about 4 mm on my 15" monitor. This is a 20KB cut from the center of the 673 KB original, Photo #1: deeptt1.jpg: 1024 X 1024 pixels, a random sample, the first of three, a little to the lower left of center of the 1.15 X 1.15 degree field, 16000 X 16000 pixels, 750.3 MB 24-bit color TIFF, the highest available resolution, www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0637.html National Optical Astronomy Observatory Deep Wide-Field Survery. I was captivated by the article with images, Sky & Telescope Sept 2001 p. 42-45 by David Tytell. In this article, image #7 has twice the resolution of the other six closeups, 2.6 X 2.6 arc-min in a 13.1 X 13.1 cm square. On Aug 30, 2001, I noticed that by looking in relaxed way into the dark background for a few minutes, I could start to discern a network of dark, thin, tangled filaments. Intrigued, I started downloading and studying images from the NOAO website. Photo #3: deepttl.jpg: Using a $ 50 program, MGI PhotoSuite 4.0, available from www.mgisoft.com, 505-764-7291, on Dec 12, I used the Touchup Filters function to change Gamma from 1.00 to 6.00, revealing a tangle of red and green thin filaments, and a few spots. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215d01ddaaba http://photos11.flickr.com/15565895_b99609a7c3_o.png #3 This is a stereo pair, made with identical copies of the first photo, rotated 90 degrees to the right, so that North is to the right and East is to the top. If you gaze gently at the center space and allow your eyes to cross, probably it will be easy to see a third image in between -- the stereo image, which if you take some time to explore will probably show unexpectedly subtle and lovely textures and details. Again, try the Large and Original sizes. MGI Photosuite 4.0 gives up a lot of detail when it is used to pair identical images. #1 was 1054 X 1029 png 2.15 MB, while this pzp pair was saved as a 768 X 1024 p bmp 2.25 MB, and then png, only 0.707 MB, and uploaded to Flickr. However, most of the interesting details are still available, and the 90 degree rotation introduces another check on the robustness of the many subtle features. Check the Original size... In Dec 2001 I started setting up these photo pairs, along the same pattern of image modification, zooming in deeper and deeper. About two decades ago I noticed that when the same photo is set up side by side, and viewed with slightly crossed eyes to make a third composite image in between, that image is created by the brain's visual system as an excellent 3D image. In fact, you can visit a TV store, where a lot of sets are all on the same channel at once, and find two sets the same size, side by side, and watch the composite image in moving 3D. If you settle your gaze gently for a few minutes into the composite image, the innate image processing facility of the brain's visual system will develop and deepen the 3D appreciation in remarkable and beautiful ways. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215d01ddaba http://photos14.flickr.com/15584725_ed93db8eed_o.png #4 Another stereo pair of CSL-1 with two more similarly strange orange double-image galaxies -- the brightness of #2 was reduced by half to test the robustness of the subtle structure, and give us more varied practice with the same image, thus stimulating the training of our subtle pattern recognition skills. The 1654 X 1655 p bmp 7.83 MB single image led to a stereo pair: 1024 X 768 p bmp 2.25 MB, then saved as png 0.597 MB pair and uploaded. Check the Original size -- has a weird beauty, and large subtle structures that puzzle me. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215d01ddab http://photos9.flickr.com/15587409_f55b84bf51_b.jpg #5 The brightness level of #2 was reduced from 0 to -50, to show more clearly that the many tiny dark spots emerge as part of a dense 3D mesh of darker and very crooked lines, while lighter lines and slightly lighter areas can still be seen. The lighter lines vary from fairly thin and straight to crooked, short, and densely packed, and seem to transition to tiny clouds and spots, which are probably very distant early galaxies. The major features I described in #2 are still available, and even more so in the Large and Original sizes. Obtain a 4 inch wide or round reading glass, hold it close to your eyes, and look thorough it with both eyes, held about 6 inches from the monitor screen or color print, viewing the Large size. The sloping edges of the opposite sides of the glass will act as prisms, enabling your eyes to converge naturally, easily creating a 3D interpretation of the scene in your awareness. It will be like hovering in space, looking down at a hill of grass. Since different colored objects on the average will actually correlate roughly with various distances, the fact that the green colors are refracted more than the orange colors will cause most of the white and orange objects to seem to float above a complex green background mesh, much like a tangled carpet of grass. It is easy to scan anywhere, tilt your head to shift your angular perspective, and back up slowly to see a wider, softened, less focused view. Verify your findings with the Original view. 1654 X 1655 p bmp 7.83 MB, then saved as png 2.31 MB and uploaded. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215d01cba http://photos13.flickr.com/16181258_4ec0c03673_b.jpg #7 a 463 X 3136 p strip from top to bottom, png file 1.94 MG, of the left (East) edge, 1/6 of its area, of the 5.5 X 5 min 15d/01 image, so this strip is 0.9 X 5 min = 54 by 300 sec. Much more red data is in this image, along with more Brightness. It is now clear that all the black spots and lines are various shades of red, and that there are many predominantly red dominant and green dominant areas. Click on All Sizes to view Large and Original. Large shows that the bottom half is noticably more full of red spots and tangled crooked lines, while the top half has more green. I started the same as with #2. From the ESO.org site, I downloaded ESO PR Photo 15d/01, Hi-Res JPEG 2768 X 3668 pixels 6.2 MB 5.5 X 6.5 arc-minutes. From the ESO.org site, I downloaded ESO PR Photo 15d/01, Hi-Res JPEG 2768 X 3668 pixels 6.2 MB 5.5 X 6.5 arc-minutes. I used an excellent low cost image processing program,MGI PhotoSuite 4.0 to crop off the text on the bottom, leaving the image 2768 X 3136 p 5.5 X 6 min. The Touchup feature next: Soften: reduced from 3 to 0, as I wanted to maximize the raw detail. Color Adjustment: Cyan-Red now raised to + 50 Magenta-Green +100 Yellow-Blue -100, as empirically this much increased the Red band, balancing the Green band, creating an image with complex details -- much more challenging to view and appreciate. Brightness was raised twice as much to +60, and the image was saved: 2768 X 3136 bmp 24.8 MB png with 1 out of 9 levels of compression 11.6 MB -- twice the 5 MB upload limit for Flickr. I thought to upload the image as six vertical strips, also making six stereo pairs, so cropped the left side into 463 X 3136 p and saved: bmp 4.16 MB png 1.94 MB, which I uploaded to Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...ACDF215d01cbcc http://photos11.flickr.com/16181259_e2c344d078_o.png #8 stereo with CSL-1 a little above the middle on the right. Click on All Sizes to see the Original. The second complex orange CSL-1 type object is in the center, about 7 CSL-1 widths down from the top (North) edge, 28 arc-sec. If you care to take some time to just relax into gazing into the third merged middle image between these two identical views, you may find in a few minutes that many subtle features and textures emerge into awareness. I used the same image settings as in #7, but made a crop on the right side to include many interesting features: 1384 X 3136 p bmp 12.4 MB , which I doubled into a stereo pair, each 367 X 835 p, saved as bmp 2.25 MB, png 0.984 MB and pzp 1.01 MB, and uploaded the png to Flickr. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215d01c http://photos13.flickr.com/16390730_02bdac1b37_b.jpg #9 CSL-1 is to the left of the lower center, with two similar complex, orange objects, in the upper left corner, and the top right edge. I started the same as with #2. From the ESO.org site, I downloaded ESO PR Photo 15d/01, Hi-Res JPEG 2768 X 3668 pixels 6.2 MB 5.5 X 6.5 arc-minutes. From the ESO.org site, I downloaded ESO PR Photo 15d/01, Hi-Res JPEG 2768 X 3668 pixels 6.2 MB 5.5 X 6.5 arc-minutes. I used an excellent low cost image processing program,MGI PhotoSuite 4.0 to crop off the text on the bottom, leaving the image 2768 X 3136 p 5.5 X 6 min. The Touchup feature next: Soften: reduced from 3 to 0, as I wanted to maximize the raw detail. Color Adjustment: Cyan-Red now raised to + 50 Magenta-Green +100 Yellow-Blue -100, as empirically this much increased the Red band, balancing the Green band, creating an image with complex details -- much more challenging to view and appreciate. Brightness was raised twice as much to +60, and the image was saved: 2768 X 3136 bmp 24.8 MB png with 1 out of 9 levels of compression 11.6 MB -- twice the 5 MB upload limit for Flickr. I used Crop to get this interesting selection: 2010 X 1502 p tif 11.8 MB png 4.82 MB Click on All Sizes to see Large and Original. If we imagine a clock face at CSL-1 to show directions, then at 7:30 at 7 widths of CSL-1 distance, 28 sec, we find a tangled cluster, 8 sec wide, of small, irregular dark red spots and lines, which seem to be a dense mesh that includes less dark red lines and lighter green lines. Click on All Sizes to see the Large and the even larger Original -- the file I uploaded. At first, the dark red spots and tangled darker red lines always seem to be behind all lighter features. But it's difficult to assess such complex, unfamiliar, fractile three dimensional meshes. If we look at 4:00 to 5:00 clock direction, 2 to 4 widths of CSL-1, 4-8 sec, we see a few longer, thinner, curved, much lighter lines -- and we may see everywhere complex meshes of tangled lighter lines, interwoven with the darker lines. If we gaze at 3:00 nine widths, 36 sec, we find a bright star, and two widths to its right, a tiny light fuzzy spot that expands upward to define a curved fan shape, barely visible, yet persistent, about 4 widths high and wide, 8 sec. We can discern this fan shape in the Large and Original views. Keep gazing -- you may start to see more subtle shapes, adjacent and overlapping the fan. Some of the lighter lines often seem to be boundaries of these subtle, fairly transparent features, like oil floating on water. If you look from CSL-1 to the 10:30 direction, about 40% of the way to the large galaxy on the left upper edge, you may discern a brighter green line, and a tangle of darker red lines, along with a white nebular streak. Switch back and forth from Large to Original to assess these items. Practice developes subtle visual skills, like learning to instantly recognize the subtle impressions of animal feet in a field of wild grass. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215a01c http://photos10.flickr.com/16600181_366762f1fd_o.png #10 from the right side of Capodimonte Deep Field's OACDF2, with CSL-1 in the lower right corner area. 1402 X 1929 p tif 10.6 MB png 4.68 MB With care, you can spot CSL-1 and the two similar objects. In this Medium image, notice how the background color has many obvious reddish and greenish regions. Notice the many long straight lines of tiny galaxies. Near the left edge in the middle is a bright green tangle of lines -- click on All Sizes to study this in Large and Original, as well as the details of the reddish and greenish regions. By now you may agree that these many and diverse subtle background features are real. They are much clearer, if you download and image process the original press release images yourself, and especially if you can find the original minimally processed Capodimonte Deep Field images. You are invited to share your images and comments on the Flickr group, AstroDeep. Starting with the ESO PR Photo 15a/01 Hi-Res JPEG 3000 X 3190 p 7.3 MB, Crop off the bottom text: 3000 X 2588 p tif 30.5 MB Image process as before, and crop from the right side: tif 11.8 MB png 4.82 MB for # 10. Also, for # 11, #12, and # 13 crop into thirds from right (West) to left (East), to make thirds: 1022 X 2588 p tif 10.4 MB 10.7 X 35 min 640 X 2100 sec with png sizes 4.59, 4.49, and 4.56 MB. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215a01d http://photos11.flickr.com/16663830_9ae832be52_o.png #11 The right third from top to bottom of OACDF2 in the Capodimente Deep Field, with CSL-1 well below the large galaxy. This image and # 12 and #13 cover the whole OACDF2 field from right (West) to left (East) in thirds. Starting with the ESO PR Photo 15a/01 Hi-Res JPEG 3000 X 3190 p 7.3 MB, Crop off the bottom text: 3000 X 2588 p tif 30.5 MB Image process as before, and crop from the right side: tif 11.8 MB png 4.82 MB for # 10. Also, for # 11, #12, and # 13 crop into thirds from right (West) to left (East), to make thirds: 1022 X 2588 p tif 10.4 MB 10.7 X 35 min 640 X 2100 sec with png sizes 4.59, 4.49, and 4.56 MB. Again, notice the reddish and greenish regions. Click on All Sizes to view Large and Original. Relax into gazing at this large-scale view. Above the left edge of the large galaxy about two-thirds of the way to the top edge are both red and green clusters of lines. At the same level on the left edge, notice a long line of small galaxies that extends roughly towards the large galaxy. Look for other such apparent lines. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215a01e http://photos14.flickr.com/16663831_4fe6488256_o.png #12 The middle third from top to bottom of OACDF2 from the Capodimonte Deep Field 1022 X 2588 p tif 10.4 MB png 4.49 MB 10.7X35 min = 640X2100 sec Click on All Sizes and select Large and the Original. Notice the bright green feature over on the right, just above the middle, which seems to be a tangle of crooked green lines -- also prominent in #10. There is a jewel of an object in the middle of the top half. The bottom third is rather reddish. http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215a01f http://photos13.flickr.com/16663832_59d06f89fe_o.png #13 the left (East) third from top (North) to bottom of OACDF2 from the Capodimonte Deep Field 1022 X 2588 p tif 10.4 MB png 4.56 MB 10.7 X 35 min = 640 X 2100 sec http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215b01c http://photos14.flickr.com/16827386_d7b3b90025_b.jpg #14 From the top left corner of OACDF2 in the Capodimonte Deep Field See also in #13 2224 X 1618 p tif 14.1 MB png 4.84 MB http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215c01c http://photos9.flickr.com/16827387_400498df00_b.jpg #15 Half way up towards the top (North) edge from the center of OACDF2 in the Capodimonte Deep Field See also in #12 2704 X 1324 p tif 14.0 MB png 4.93 MB http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215e01c http://photos10.flickr.com/16910908_0f941ee7e9_b.jpg #16 galaxy cluster in the lower left of the OACDF2 field. See also # 13 Notice the increased density of green in the lower third or so. In Large size, with my wide reading glass, it seems that the tiny, far away red galaxies blend into the red mesh of tangled lines, and that some of the tangled red lines seem to lie in front of tiny background green spots that are twice to several times wider. This indicates that the red mesh in general is closer and less red shifted than the green mesh. In turn, this suggests that the green mesh must be more distant, higher energy light, perhaps ultraviolet, redshifted to green. All this seems to fit fairly well the images from the recent Millennium Simulation: www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galform/millennium/ images http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galfo...um/0504097.pdf 800 MB See # 18 and # 19. 2168 X 1697 p tif 14.4 MB png 4.91 MB http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroOACDF215f01c http://photos13.flickr.com/16910909_c8264e7dad_b.jpg #17 From the right side middle of OACDF2 See also # 11. 1871 X 1765 p tif 12.9 MB png 4.89 MB http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroMSseqF_063aL http://photos12.flickr.com/18135101_1ef7723b85_o.jpg # 18 The Millennium Simulation, announced 2005.06.02 by the Virgo consortium, used the largest supercomputer in Europe, at the German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory, for over a month to model the history of the Universe in a cube over 2 billion light years on a side, holding 20 million galaxies. This image is a closeup of the results at redshift z = 0, showing a 15 MPC/h thick slice, showing the mass distribution, not the visible light. 2048 X 1536 pixels jpg 2.07411 MB You can magnify this image 8X to see pixels of 1 mm size on a 17" monitor. The distance measure Mpc/h has been used for decades to adjust to the fact that the Hubble constant = H has not been exactly determined. Mpc is megaparsecs. A parsec is 3.26 light years. The Millennium Simulation used the value 0.73 for the Hubble constant H. To get the distance in MPC, we multiply their value by 100/H = 100/0.73 = 1.37 , which for the scale bar of 31.25 Mpc/h becomes 42.8 Mpc = 139.6 Ly. This image has a width, directly measured on my monitor, of 91.1 Mpc/h = 124.8 Mpc = 406.9 MLy. The huge, densely packed galaxy cluster, holding thousands of galaxies, for the greenish central region, has a length of about 2/13.6 = 14.7 % of the image width = 60 MLy. In contrast, the nearest large neighbor to our Milky Way galaxy is Andromeda galaxy at 2.2 MLy distance. The distribution of mass in the Universe is very fractile -- it looks just as complex and very much the same at a very wide range of distance scales. So, even though I do not know how wide this image would be in terms of angular measures (degrees, minutes, seconds), it is probably justified to compare it to the Capodimonte Deep Field subtle background visible light images. Many features are the same: complex 3D fractile network, with bright boundaries around both brighter (more dense) and dimmer (more empty) regions, and both brighter and thicker and thinner and dimmer lines. I don't believe that the MS image includes gravitational lensing, which must be a complex factor in the CDF images. Click on All Sizes to view Large and Original. www.pparc.ac.uk/Nw/millennium_sim.asp The Virgo consortium www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galform/millennium/ http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galfo.../seqF_063a.jpg arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504097 Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution pil.phys.uniroma1.it/debate3.html On the fractile structure of the universe Sylos Labini, Montuori & Pietronero http://www.flickr.com/photos/6874482...n/photostream/ astroMSgalseq_D_063 http://photos13.flickr.com/18135102_07a58fd89d_o.jpg # 19 The Millennium Simulation, announced 2005.06.02 by the Virgo consortium, used the largest supercomputer in Europe, at the German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory, for over a month to model the history of the Universe in a cube over 2 billion light years on a side, holding 20 million galaxies. This image is a closeup of the results at redshift z = 0, showing a 15 MPC/h thick slice, showing the visible light distribution, which closely follows the mass distribution. The view is four times wider than in #18, so that the width of the image is 1628 MLy. The length of the central large and dense galaxy cluster is about 60 MLy. 1024 X 768 pixels jpg 0.970950 MB The distance measure Mpc/h has been used for decades to adjust to the fact that the Hubble constant = H has not been exactly determined. Mpc is megaparsecs. A parsec is 3.26 light years. The Millennium Simulation used the value 0.73 for the Hubble constant H. To get the distance in MPC, we multiply their value by 100/H = 100/0.73 = 1.37 . The huge, densely packed galaxy cluster, holding thousands of galaxies, for the greenish central region, has a length of about 60 MLy. In contrast, the nearest large neighbor to our Milky Way galaxy is Andromeda galaxy at 2.2 MLy distance. The distribution of mass in the Universe is very fractile -- it looks just as complex and very much the same at a very wide range of distance scales. So, even though I do not know how wide this image would be in terms of angular measures (degrees, minutes, seconds), it is probably justified to compare it to the Capodimonte Deep Field subtle background visible light images. Many features are the same: complex 3D fractile network, with bright boundaries around both brighter (more dense) and dimmer (more empty) regions, and both brighter and thicker and thinner and dimmer lines. I don't believe that the MS image includes gravitational lensing, which must be a complex factor in the CDF images. Click on All Sizes to view Original. www.pparc.ac.uk/Nw/millennium_sim.asp The Virgo consortium www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galform/millennium/ http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galfo...lseq_D_063.jpg arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0504097 Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution pil.phys.uniroma1.it/debate3.html On the fractile structure of the universe Sylos Labini, Montuori & Pietronero ************************************************************** Flickr serves to facilitate groups of people joining to share and discuss images. Any visitor or Free member ( immediate sign-up ) can view and download your photos in many sizes, if you select that option, upload their own photos and notes, and join your group, but only fellow Pro members ( cost $25 yearly ) can download your full size original images. You are welcome to contact me directly: Rich Murray, MA Room For All rmforall@comcast.net 505-501-2298 1943 Otowi Road Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 USA Your new permanent name is rmforall . Now you can direct people to your Flickr pages! Here are the addresses you can use to show people your photos (and your Flickr profile). http://www.flickr.com/photos/rmforall/ http://www.flickr.com/people/rmforall/ http://www.flickr.com/help.gne#18 1. What is Flickr? Flickr is the best way to store, sort, search and share your photos online. There is a huge mass of photos in the world, and Flickr provides a way to organize yours, and for you and your friends and family to tell your stories about them. The best way to learn about it is to upload some photos, explore the site, join some groups and make some friends. There is more information about Flickr and who is responsible on our About Page. 2. Will Flickr always be free? Yes, there will always be a free version of Flickr. It will be limited in certain ways and you get more with your paid subscription, but it's still fun! There is the option of upgrading to a Flickr Pro Account, for just $24.95 (US) per year. You can also buy a Pro Account for a friend if you're feeling generous. Members of the general public who aren't members of Flickr can never comment on your photos. 83. What are the system requirements? Although there are no system requirements to run Flickr, for PCs, Macs or Linux, we recommend any recent version of a Mozilla-based browser, including Firefox and Mozilla. On a Mac you can also use the most recent version of Apple's Safari browser. On a PC, Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 (or greater) will also work well. To get the most out of Flickr, you'll want to have the latest version of Macromedia's Flash plugin installed. We do recommend that you use a reasonably powerful computer, and a fast Internet connection, because that will make it more fun. Note: Flickr does not currently support the Mac IE browser. 3. Can I pay to keep more of my photos on Flickr? Absolutely! Upgrade to a Pro Account for just US$24.95 a year. Here's what you'll get with a Pro Account: 2 GB monthly upload limit Unlimited storage Unlimited bandwidth Unlimited photosets Permanent archiving of high-resolution original images Ad-free browsing and sharing Compare that to what you get with a Free Account: 20 MB monthly upload limit 3 photosets Photostream views limited to the 200 most recent images Storage of smaller (resized) images For more information, visit our upgrade page. 14. How do I share my photos with people? There are several ways... People who pop by to visit Flickr will be able to see your public photos. Here are some other ways to share: You can blog any public photo in the system, You can set up your own Flickr web address (like http://www.flickr.com/photos/george/), and share it with all your friends, You can send individual photos to people, either as attachments to an email, or pointing them to a photo's Flickr page, or You can make a Flickr badge, and put it on your own website. 5. How do I upload my photos? We provide a range of uploading tools to help you get your photos into Flickr, for both Windows and Mac users. You can send your photos into Flickr via email as well. Everyone is provided with their own 'magic' email addresses: 1) to upload your photos to your Flickr photostream, and 2) to upload your photos to your Flickr photostream AND to post the photo to your blog automatically. Configure your Upload-Via-Email settings here. You can also use a web form to upload up to six photos at a time from the upload page, if you'd rather not install any of our tools. 6. What's this Photostream thingy? Your photostream is a history of everything you have ever uploaded in Flickr. Depending on their relationship to you, everyone enjoys a different view of your photostream. This is because you can decide whether or not to show your photos to everyone who visits your stream, or single out particular photos that you only want your family or friends to see. By the way, if you have a free account, your photostream will only display the last 200 photos you have uploaded, 10 per page. If you have a Pro Account, everything is displayed. 7. Is there a limit on the number of photos I can have? No. There is only a limit to how many will display at any one time (the most recent 200 photos in your photostream), and this is only a limit if you have a Free Account. If you have Free Account, your upload bandwidth is limited to 20 MB per month. You can see how much bandwidth you've used by going to the upload page. If you upgrade to a Pro Account, all the photos you add to Flickr will be permanently available for your friends and family to see. 8. What are the size limits and file types on photos? Flickr officially supports JPEGs, non-animated GIFs and PNGs. If you have free account, each photo you upload must be less than 5MB in size. If you have a pro account, each file must be less than 10MB. Each photo is compressed and re-sized by Flickr (if necessary), and is available in the following sizes: 75x75 pixels 120 pixels (on the longest side) 240 pixels 500 pixels Large And the original size (if you hold a pro account) [ up to 10 MB size ] You can access all of these sizes for a photo via a link under the photo title labelled 'View different sizes', from its individual page. We also store your high-resolution originals for you if you have a Pro Account, which you (and your friends with Pro Accounts) can download again at anytime. All Pro Account holders can access public photos and download the high-resolution (original) size, unless you specify who has access to the downloadable image. 13. I noticed that the photos I upload are resized. Can I access my original images? We do resize your photos to more web-friendly dimensions. Each image has a 75x75 pixel thumbnail, a 120 px, a 240 px, a 500 px and a 1024 px version (that's the length of the longest side), as well as your original file. When you are viewing an individual photo's page, you will see a link under the photo title labelled 'View a larger version' that links to a page where you can view each of these sizes, and download them if you wish. If you have a free account, no-one (including you) can access your original file. If you have a pro account, your original files are available for download. There is a global setting in your account where you can specify who you will allow to download originals: Only You, Your Friends and/or Family, Your Contacts, Any Flickr User (Recommended), or Anyone. Also, if you have attached any sort of Creative Commons license to your photo, this assumes that you're OK with sharing the photo, and therefore, makes the original available to anyone who wants it. 19. How do I download a photo? Select the photo you'd like to download. Click the 'All Sizes' button along the top of the photo. This takes you to another page where you can select the size of the photo you wish to download. (Bear in mind, you may not have permission to download the original file.) 20. How can I tell when people leave comments? Any time someone leaves a comment about one of your photos, you will see a little flag on your home page ('You have new comments!'), which points you to a summary page of new comments. If you've clicked through and viewed your new comments, this flag is removed from your home page when you end your session (close your browser). You can also see a history of all the comments you've made on other people's photos here. 21. Can anybody comment on my photos? Most of the time, yes, unless you say you don't want them to. We recommend that any Flickr user be able to comment on your photos... but you don't have to go that way if you don't want to. There is a page available in your account area that lets you specify default settings for what you'd like most of the time. You can change this for each individual photo if you wish. If someone leaves a comment on a photo that you don't like, you can choose to delete it, as well as prevent that individual from commenting on your photos in future. 22. How do I get the URL of a photo? Some websites will ask you to provide a URL to a photo (for example, when you add a photo to your Blogger profile). To use this method, you need to provide the web address (URL) of the image itself, not the address of the web page where the image is being displayed. Here's an example of a correct URL for a photo: » http://www.flickr.com/photos/132375_0ca82ae31e.jpg Here's an example of a incorrect URL for a photo. (It points to the web page where the image is displayed, not the image file itself. You'll notice there's no .jpg on the end.) » http://www.flickr.com/photos/eric/132375/ (Click on both of these links so you can see the difference...) To get the URL of the actual image file, first find the photo you want to use. Then you should see an 'View different sizes' link to the right of the photo, or you can use the 'All sizes' link next to the photo. Select the photo size you want from the available options (square, thumbnail, medium, and large or original if you have permission to access these). If you're looking at one of your own photos, you will see two text fields underneath the photo. The first one contains the URL to the image itself, and the second one contains a snippet of HTML that will produce the photo on your website, with a link back to the photo page here on Flickr. Simply copy and paste the one you're after into your website. Note: The URL should end in ..jpg. If it doesn't, you probably aren't viewing the image on its own. If you're trying to get the URL of an image that you don't own, you may not be able to access the Different Sizes page (because the owner isn't allowing downloads of their photo). Note: Our Terms of Use dictate that whenever you place an image you're storing on Flickr on an external website, you also need to include a link back to Flickr. 24. What is Organizr and how do I use it? Organizr is a great way of managing all of your photos. Within Organizr you can browse through your photos, search for photos using titles, descriptions or tags, create a photoset, insert photos into your groups and more. Browsing photos Select the Browse tab on the Organizr home page. Click 'Load all your photos'. This displays all photos you have entered into Flickr. Note the timeline on the bottom of the page. You can browse photos from whatever time period you specify -- simply by dragging the white bars to the left or right. You'll see the dates and number of photos change at the top of the folder. Searching photos Now select the Search tab. You have a couple of options here. One is to enter the word or phrase yourself and click 'Search'. All words that you enter in the text box will bring up photos using those tags. Note that using quotes around a phrase does not limit the search to the phrase only. Another option is to select the tags by clicking the boxes next to your tags. If you don't see all of your tags there, click the link from 'load all your tags'. You can search using all or any of the tags you've selected. Just click the Search button to bring up your photo(s). Creating a photoset Click 'Create a new set' on the bottom right of the page. Add a title, a description and then drag a photo onto the white square. Drag other photos into the grey area on the right until you're happy with your set. Click Save and you've built a set! Inserting photos into groups And inserting photos into your groups is easily accomplished by selecting the 'Your groups' tab. Then just drag and drop a photo into whatever group you choose. In the near future we plan on adding a feature that will allow you to insert entire photo sets into your groups. 36. Can anyone leave a comment? Most of the time, yes, unless you say you don't want them to. We recommend that any Flickr user be able to comment on your photos... but you don't have to go that way if you don't want to. There is a page available in your account area which lets you specify default settings for what you'd like most of the time. You can change this for each individual photo if you wish. Members of the general public who aren't members of Flickr can never comment on your photos. 58. How are groups administered? The creator of a group is automatically made an Admin of that group. That means they have the power to Promote other users to become Admins, to Kick users out of the group and to Ban users permanently. The only way to become the Admin of a group that someone else has started is for the Admin (or one of the Admins, if there are more than one) to promote you. There can be an unlimited number of Admins. 60. How do I share a photo with a group I belong to? Easy! If you belong to the group, just add your photo to the group pool (if not, join the group first). The easiest way is to go to the photo's page, and click on the "Send to Group" button on the left side. Click that, then choose the group you want to send it to, and you're done! If you have more than one photo you want to add, the best way is to use Organizr. When the Organizr loads, you'll see a 'Your groups' tab on the right-hand panel. Find the photos you want to add, and drag them onto the group! (There's more information and a video of this process here.) Once a photo is in a group pool, only you and the group adminstrators can remove it. 61. How do I place an image into a post or comment? You can post an image in a forum by getting your photo's URL first. Go to the photo you'd like to post, click the "View different sizes" link and grab (copy) the URL. Then when you get to your group's thread, in your post use the tag "img src="http://...". To change the size of the image in your post, place an extension on the filename. For example, 111111_1111_s.jpg. Here are the extensions: Square: _s Thumbnail: _t Small: _m Medium: (none - default) Large: _b Original: _o 62. Who can see photos in a group pool? Adding a photo to a group pool allows any group member to view your photo, and add notes, tags and comments, regardless of its current privacy settings. Your photo will retain the privacy settings you've created for anyone who isn't a member of this group. It will also stay in your photostream, available to everyone else who can view it. You (or a group adminstrator) can remove your photo from the pool at any time. 69. Can I point my friends towards a page that's mine in Flickr? Yes! You can make your very own Flickr web address. You just need to choose an alias which will represent your Flickr page. Once you've set your alias, this cannot be changed, so think carefully! Then you will have two addresses which you can share with your friends, that will look a bit like these: For your photos page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rmforall/ For your profile: http://www.flickr.com/people/rmforall/ ************************************************************** |
| Oct11-06, 03:25 PM | #2 |
|
|
"Rich Murray" <rmforall@att.net> wrote in message news:11alukl4m7sdk48@news.supernews.com... > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/11 subtle background > structure in deep astronomy photos; CSL-1 cosmic string > gravitational lens in Capodimonte Deep Field; Millennium Simulation > of evolving cosmic structure; AstroDeep group; Murray mesh; > www.Flickr.com > > Rich Murray, MA Room For All rmforall@comcast.net 505-501-2298 > 1943 Otowi Road Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 USA > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/ AstroDeep@yahoogroups.com > This group was started 2002.01.19, and allows sharing and > discussion of 100KB jpg photos. A new AstroDeep group is available > on Flickr.com to share png photos, up to 5 to 10 MB size, with many > sizes viewable of each photo. > > http://www.flickr.com/groups/97329064@N00/ > > About AstroDeep: > > Share and discuss ultra deep sky astronomy photos, up to 5 MB each, > that show mysterious, fascinating, and unexplained subtle > background structure: appears to be a very distant 3D fractile > tangle of dark and light spots, threads, and lines, behind all > galaxies, which I named 'Murray mesh' in January 2002. > > I'd like a self-organizing community of people to evolve to enjoy > and study this wonder in the spirit of free, civil, open-minded > scientific sharing, serious, playful, and aesthetic, and including > professionals as well as amateurs. Skeptical assessments are > welcome, in case the subtle features are artifacts of > instrumentation, processing, or perception. > <snip> > For your photos page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rmforall/ > > For your profile: http://www.flickr.com/people/rmforall/ > ************************************************************** > I don't know to what extent you or others did your own processing, but here's a "processing" tip: you would be amazed at how much quality faint detail you can pull in from black backgrounds by adjusting the screen brightness and contrast off Windows. It depends on your setup, but you can usually pull that gain grip up and just brighten up that dark background and show all kinds of faint objects (in effect, turning a 0, 3 brightness step into about a 3, 20 or so that you can see.) It looks as good as what you would take longer to get right in PhotoShop type programs. But don't leave it like that, it's not good for the monitor. Neil Bates |
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: subtle background structure in deep astronomy photos; CSL-1 cosmic string gravitational lens in Capodimonte Deep Field; Millennium Simulation of evolving cosmic structure; AstroDeep group; Murray mesh; www.Flickr.com evolving cosmic structure; As
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Testing string theory soon, with Cosmic Microwave Background? | Beyond the Standard Model | 4 | ||
| Hubble Infrared Ultra Deep Field clearly reveals deep cosmic background | Beyond the Standard Model | 0 | ||
| more candidate cosmic string lens pairs in HUDF (re comment by Levon Pogosian on astro-ph/0506400); also myriad minute bright blue sources, always on dark background mesh: Murray 2005.08.19 | General Physics | 0 | ||
| Re: subtle background structure in deep astronomy photos; CSL-1 cosmic | General Physics | 0 | ||
| how important/fundamental is self-similarity in cosmic structure? | General Physics | 3 | ||