Gauge Transformations in Momentum Space?

mikem@despammed.com

Eugene Stefanovich wrote:

> I would prefer to generalize the way we integrate
> things rather that stick to artificial separable spaces
> only to discover that they cannot accomodate the
> interacting systems we are most interested in.

So would I, and (I'm sure) a great many other people.
But doing it in a compelling natural way remains a
severe challenge (though I should probably wait
until I read up on non-standard analysis before
saying anything more).

> No, [the paper] is not on the Internet. I can send
> you a copy if you give me your address.

I just attempted to email you, but if that doesn't
work, the address that I post under also works
(for non-spam and non-viral material).
I.e: mikem at despammed dot remove this com.
If you can send me a PDF I'd be grateful.

mikem@despammed.com

Eugene Stefanovich wrote:

> I would prefer to generalize the way we integrate
> things rather that stick to artificial separable spaces
> only to discover that they cannot accomodate the
> interacting systems we are most interested in.

So would I, and (I'm sure) a great many other people.
But doing it in a compelling natural way remains a
severe challenge (though I should probably wait
until I read up on non-standard analysis before
saying anything more).

> No, [the paper] is not on the Internet. I can send
> you a copy if you give me your address.

I just attempted to email you, but if that doesn't
work, the address that I post under also works
(for non-spam and non-viral material).
I.e: mikem at despammed dot remove this com.
If you can send me a PDF I'd be grateful.

mikem@despammed.com

Eugene Stefanovich wrote:

> I would prefer to generalize the way we integrate
> things rather that stick to artificial separable spaces
> only to discover that they cannot accomodate the
> interacting systems we are most interested in.

So would I, and (I'm sure) a great many other people.
But doing it in a compelling natural way remains a
severe challenge (though I should probably wait
until I read up on non-standard analysis before
saying anything more).

> No, [the paper] is not on the Internet. I can send
> you a copy if you give me your address.

I just attempted to email you, but if that doesn't
work, the address that I post under also works
(for non-spam and non-viral material).
I.e: mikem at despammed dot remove this com.
If you can send me a PDF I'd be grateful.

mikem@despammed.com

Eugene Stefanovich wrote:

> I would prefer to generalize the way we integrate
> things rather that stick to artificial separable spaces
> only to discover that they cannot accomodate the
> interacting systems we are most interested in.

So would I, and (I'm sure) a great many other people.
But doing it in a compelling natural way remains a
severe challenge (though I should probably wait
until I read up on non-standard analysis before
saying anything more).

> No, [the paper] is not on the Internet. I can send
> you a copy if you give me your address.

I just attempted to email you, but if that doesn't
work, the address that I post under also works
(for non-spam and non-viral material).
I.e: mikem at despammed dot remove this com.
If you can send me a PDF I'd be grateful.

mikem@despammed.com

Eugene Stefanovich wrote:

> I would prefer to generalize the way we integrate
> things rather that stick to artificial separable spaces
> only to discover that they cannot accomodate the
> interacting systems we are most interested in.

So would I, and (I'm sure) a great many other people.
But doing it in a compelling natural way remains a
severe challenge (though I should probably wait
until I read up on non-standard analysis before
saying anything more).

> No, [the paper] is not on the Internet. I can send
> you a copy if you give me your address.

I just attempted to email you, but if that doesn't
work, the address that I post under also works
(for non-spam and non-viral material).
I.e: mikem at despammed dot remove this com.
If you can send me a PDF I'd be grateful.

mikem@despammed.com

Eugene Stefanovich wrote:

> I would prefer to generalize the way we integrate
> things rather that stick to artificial separable spaces
> only to discover that they cannot accomodate the
> interacting systems we are most interested in.

So would I, and (I'm sure) a great many other people.
But doing it in a compelling natural way remains a
severe challenge (though I should probably wait
until I read up on non-standard analysis before
saying anything more).

> No, [the paper] is not on the Internet. I can send
> you a copy if you give me your address.

I just attempted to email you, but if that doesn't
work, the address that I post under also works
(for non-spam and non-viral material).
I.e: mikem at despammed dot remove this com.
If you can send me a PDF I'd be grateful.

mikem@despammed.com

Eugene Stefanovich wrote:

> I would prefer to generalize the way we integrate
> things rather that stick to artificial separable spaces
> only to discover that they cannot accomodate the
> interacting systems we are most interested in.

So would I, and (I'm sure) a great many other people.
But doing it in a compelling natural way remains a
severe challenge (though I should probably wait
until I read up on non-standard analysis before
saying anything more).

> No, [the paper] is not on the Internet. I can send
> you a copy if you give me your address.

I just attempted to email you, but if that doesn't
work, the address that I post under also works
(for non-spam and non-viral material).
I.e: mikem at despammed dot remove this com.
If you can send me a PDF I'd be grateful.

mikem@despammed.com

Eugene Stefanovich wrote:

> I would prefer to generalize the way we integrate
> things rather that stick to artificial separable spaces
> only to discover that they cannot accomodate the
> interacting systems we are most interested in.

So would I, and (I'm sure) a great many other people.
But doing it in a compelling natural way remains a
severe challenge (though I should probably wait
until I read up on non-standard analysis before
saying anything more).

> No, [the paper] is not on the Internet. I can send
> you a copy if you give me your address.

I just attempted to email you, but if that doesn't
work, the address that I post under also works
(for non-spam and non-viral material).
I.e: mikem at despammed dot remove this com.
If you can send me a PDF I'd be grateful.

mikem@despammed.com

Eugene Stefanovich wrote:

> I would prefer to generalize the way we integrate
> things rather that stick to artificial separable spaces
> only to discover that they cannot accomodate the
> interacting systems we are most interested in.

So would I, and (I'm sure) a great many other people.
But doing it in a compelling natural way remains a
severe challenge (though I should probably wait
until I read up on non-standard analysis before
saying anything more).

> No, [the paper] is not on the Internet. I can send
> you a copy if you give me your address.

I just attempted to email you, but if that doesn't
work, the address that I post under also works
(for non-spam and non-viral material).
I.e: mikem at despammed dot remove this com.
If you can send me a PDF I'd be grateful.