The absolute/relational nature of spacetime

Yvon Sauvageau

I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.

Please find a copy of

"Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"

[Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]

At http://www.rationalmechanics.com

Abstract:

Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

Sincerely,

Yvon Sauvageau

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Uncle Al

Yvon Sauvageau wrote:
>
> I wish to notify the readers of my solution to a problem that has
> regularly been discussed in this newsgroup.
>
> Please find a copy of
>
> "Absolute spacetime is inherent to dynamics"
>
> [Accepted for publication in Physics Essays]
>
> At http://www.rationalmechanics.com
>
> Abstract:
>
> Ever since the Greek Antiquity, it has been debated whether physical
> motion is relational or absolute. In the absence of any clear
> resolution, all discourses on the subject have been confined to
> qualitative philosophical arguments. This article demonstrates
> mathematically that the laws of dynamics imply that motion is absolute.
> In addition, this article elucidates Newton's bucket phenomenon.

You won't get a reputable journal to publish your contention (other
than in an 01 April issue) because it is so blatantly empirically
wrong. A huge body of work across a vast array of venues and scales -
without a single observational exception - says you are wrong. GPS
for instance, and

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf