Upper and Lower Sums: Functions w/ Property?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jupiter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sums
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of upper and lower sums in the context of functions, particularly focusing on which types of functions may have the property that some upper sum equals some lower sum for a given partition. The scope includes theoretical considerations related to Riemann integration and the behavior of various function types, such as constant, odd, even, and discontinuous functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that constant functions always have equal upper and lower sums, while odd functions may do so in certain cases.
  • Others argue that even functions and discontinuous functions generally do not have this property, particularly when considering all partitions.
  • A participant questions whether the discussion pertains to Riemann integration and clarifies that upper and lower sums will not be equal for every possible partition.
  • One participant suggests that if there exists a partition where upper and lower sums are equal, it may impose restrictions on the function.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of having a function that is not constant on an interval, indicating that differing upper and lower sums arise from certain partitions.
  • Some participants highlight the importance of considering specific partitions rather than all possible partitions, noting that a single partition yielding equal sums does not imply it holds for all partitions.
  • There is mention of the potential for continuous functions to have partitions where upper and lower sums can be equal, but this becomes more complex for discontinuous functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the types of functions that can have equal upper and lower sums, with no consensus reached on a definitive characterization. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of specific partitions versus all partitions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of upper and lower sums, the nature of partitions considered, and the specific types of functions discussed. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps or assumptions involved in the arguments presented.

Jupiter
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Which functions have the property that some upper some equals some (other) lower sum?

Constant functions obviously do. Odd functions do in some cases. Even functions don't. Step functions won't (unless we restrict our consideration to an interval where it is constant). In fact it seems that all discontinuous functions would fail to have this property. Can anyone generalize/formalize this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
upper and lower sums of what? are you talking about Riemann integration here?
 
Well, in general they will never be equal on every possible partition. Even for the function f(x)=x on the interval [0,1] that conjecture is trivially false - they differ by approximatey e.f(e) + h.f(1) where e and h are the lengths of the first and last subset in the partition.

So, you are asking if there is always some partition, P, that has U(P)= L(P), what does that imply about f?

Hmm, not sure. What partitions are you using for the results for some odd functions?

In fact because if true for partition P it is true for any refinement of P, then I think it will serverely restrict potential f's
 
Last edited:
I assume that you mean:
[tex]e*f(0)+h*f(1)[/tex]

Obviously, the function [tex]f(x)=0[/tex] will always have upper and lower sums equal to [tex]0[/tex].

To Jupiter:

Even in more abstract situations, constant functions are continuous.

Now, let's assume that we have a function [tex]f:\Re\rightarrow\Re[/tex] that is not constant ]on some interval [tex][a,b][/tex].
Now, if [tex]f(a)\neq f(b)[/tex] then we have that the entire interval is a partition with differing upper and lower sums.
Now, since [tex]f[/tex] is not constant, there is some [tex]x[/tex] such that [tex]f(x) \neq f(a)[/tex] unless [tex]x=\frac{b+a}{2}[/tex] the partition on [tex]a,x,b[/tex] will generate differing upper and lower sum, so the only remaining case is where [tex]x=\frac{b+a}{2}[/tex]
Now, if there is some [tex]y\neqx[/tex] and [tex]f(y)\neq f(a)[/tex] then we have a partition on [tex]a,y,b[/tex] which generates differing upper and lower sums.
Otherwise there is no such [tex]y[/tex] so for any [tex]z \in [a,b], z\neqx \rightarrow f(z)=f(a)[/tex] so we can partition along [tex]a, \frac{a+a+b}{3},x,b[/tex] and get differing upper and lower sums.

Therefore, the only functions that can have equal upper and lower sums for all partitions are cosntant functions.
 
. and * both denote multiplication. I don't see what f(x)=0 has to do with my example f(x)=x

secondly, the rest of your argument falls into the trap that i hit: the original question asks, about *a* partition, not *every* partition. You've shown that a 2 part partition might not do it, that doesn't say anything about other more esoteric partitions. As posed, it is not sufficient to provide some partition on which the upper and lower sums are different, but to show that on every partition they are different. (notice the word 'some' in the question.)

I think that the refinement argument might yield something interesting.
 
Last edited:
Well, if you can describe the minimal and maximal U and L partitions, then you should be able to take advantange of continuity to show that for continuous functions there are patitions so that [tex]U(P_1)=L(P_2)[/tex] it's a bit tricky with non-continous functions.

For the upper and lower values on the same partitions to be the same is a good bit trickier.
 
But you can't as the example f(x)=x shows on the interval [0,1]

for any partition the difference is e^2+h, where e and h are the lengths of the first and last subinterval.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K