Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around finding a formula for the number of pairs of non-quadratic residues (QN) between 1 and p-1, utilizing specific mathematical expressions involving Legendre symbols. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of counting arguments related to quadratic residues and non-residues.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Mathematical reasoning
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Casey expresses difficulty in deriving a formula for the number of QN pairs and references a specific summation involving Legendre symbols.
- Casey notes a known result for the number of pairs of quadratic residues (QR) and seeks assistance in applying this to QN.
- Hurkyl asks for clarification on the definitions of QN and QR, which are explained as non-squares and squares mod p, respectively.
- Another participant questions the definition of "pairs" and suggests that it may not simply refer to combinations of QN elements.
- Casey clarifies that "pairs" refers to adjacent QN numbers in the sequence from 1 to p.
- A participant proposes an alternative counting argument for determining the number of pairs, expressing uncertainty about the utility of the required sum.
- Casey later provides a derived expression for the number of QN pairs and requests verification of this result, indicating a potential solution but leaving room for confirmation.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the approach to solving the problem, with no consensus reached on the validity of Casey's derived formula or the utility of the proposed summation.
Contextual Notes
There are unresolved questions regarding the interpretation of the summation and the role of the constant k in the context of the problem. Additionally, the discussion reflects varying levels of understanding of the concepts involved.