Has Any One solved Fermats Last Theorem ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karthik3k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the status of Fermat's Last Theorem, particularly focusing on its proof by Andrew Wiles and the implications of that proof. Participants explore the background of Wiles, the nature of the proof, and its accessibility to a broader audience.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Andrew Wiles solved Fermat's Last Theorem, referencing his proof and its acceptance.
  • Others inquire about Wiles' identity and background, seeking clarification on his contributions to mathematics.
  • One participant notes that Wiles' 1993 proof contained errors and required further refinement by others over the years.
  • There is mention of the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture's connection to Fermat's Last Theorem, highlighting its complexity and the collaborative nature of the proof's development.
  • Several participants recommend resources, including Simon Singh's book and a television program, to provide additional context and understanding of the theorem and its proof.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Wiles is credited with solving Fermat's Last Theorem, but there are differing views on the completeness and accessibility of his proof, as well as the implications of the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the initial errors in Wiles' proof and the subsequent corrections made by others, as well as the depth of understanding required to fully grasp the mathematical concepts involved.

karthik3k
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Has Any One solved Fermats Last Theorem ??

Has Any One solved/proved/disproved "Fermats Last Theorem" ??

Is that an accepted one ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes' Wiles, 5-10 years ago; he got the money; it's been simplified to the level of a postgrad lecture course; there are many books on it.
 
Hey thanx.
Btw, who is Wiles ?
 
Andrew Wiles...'solver' of Fermat's
 
Andrew Wiles was born and educated in England but emigrated to the United States and is still, I believe, a professor at Princeton University. In 1993 he presented a proof of the "Taniyama-Shimura" conjecture. It asserted that every one of a certain type of elliptic function could be associated in a specific way with a modular form. Not at all an elementary subject and not obviously connected with Fermat's Last Theorem. However, Gerhard Frey had earlier proved that Fermat's Last Theorem was true if and only if the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture was true!
Clearly, it was a group effort and a remarkable achievement.
Probably the most accessible discussion is still Simon Singh's book "Fermat's Enigma".
Until you can get that book (check your local library), here is a website with links to several sites talking about Fermat's Last Theorem:
http://cgd.best.vwh.net/home/flt/flt01.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The 1993 proof contained some errors though. Well, it is very long piece of mathematics. It took a couple of years tidying up by various people. He gave the first talk on it at Cambridge, there is I believe a reference to it in one of Tom Korner's writings: what it was like realizing that at the end of a very technical discussion that Wiles had just written, Corollary, x^n+y^n=z^n has no solutions in positive integers for n > 2. There had been a rumour about that being the real purpose of the talk and consequently he got a much larger audience than one might expect for such a topic. (Elliptic Modular Forms.)

If you are in the UK there is a Panorama program on it that might be available somehow; it interviews him, Conway (a colleague at Princeton), and several others, including John Coates (Wiles's PhD supervisor).

As far as I'm aware Wiles is still at Princeton.

He is a very clever and humble man, who came to a question and answer session for a group of High School (A-level) students I was working with once. I don't think that the students quite understood just what he had done, but equally I don't think he could grasp that they didn't know any higher pure mathematics when he tried to answer some of their questions. His modesty at his acheivement makes a refreshing change.
 
There was also an excellant program, on television, Nova (PBS) entitled "The Proof" tells of some of the above, and more...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K