| Thread Closed |
Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov4-06, 03:32 PM | #1 |
|
|
Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
[Moderator's note: Please try to wrap your lines to 72 characters, as I
have done below. This allows the post to be quoted 4 times with a standard symbol like "> " without exceeding the 80-character limit, which is what many displays have. -P.H.] Dear SPR folks: In QED, one transforms a Dirac wavefunction psi according to psi --> psi' = e^ia psi, where a is a local gauge parameter. As a consequence of d_u (understood to be a partial derivative) operating on psi in the Dirac equation (gamma^u d_u - m) psi, to maintain gauge invariance we are forced to absorb d_u a by introducing a vector field A^u transforming as eA_u --> eA_u' + d_u a, where A_u is the vector potential (field) for the photon and e is the running electric charge (such that a = (1/4pi)e^2 ~ 1/137.036 at low probe energy). There are, if you will, two levels to this gauge transformation: the e^ia which multiplies the wavefunction psi, and the eA_u --> eA_u' + d_ua which describes how the photon transforms. In the *linear approximation* of general relativity, the linear field equation kappa_0 T^uv = d^a d_a (phi^uv) in said to be invariant under the gauge transformation h_uv --> h_uv' = h_uv + d_u /\^v + d+v /\^u where phi^uv = h^uv - (1/2) n^uv h represents the graviton, where h^uv is the gravitational field tensor, and where n^uv is the Minkowski metric tensor. This, of course, is analogous to eA_u --> eA_u' + d_ua, but the gauge parameter /\^v is a vector field rather than the scalar field a of QED. My question is this: what is the general relativistic analog, if any, to the wavefunction psi in QED, and *especially*, to the term e^ia which multiplies psi in QED? If we were to write down an e^i/\^u and use this to transform some type of wavefunction PSI (of unknown structure for now, capitalized to differentiate from the psi of QED), that is, if we were to write down e^i/\^u PSI, this would automatically add a vector index to whatever the structure is of PSI. I have played with a variety of structures for putting the gauge parameter /\^u into a complex exponential and for the associated PSI, and it is not clear to me whether the QED psi --> psi' = e^ia psi even has an analogy in general relativity, even in the linear approximation. I note also that in non-Abelian gauge theory (QCD for example), we use psi --> psi' = e^i lambda_j a_j psi where j=1,2,3...8 for QCD is an internal symmetry index and lambda_j are the QCD structure matrices. Here, the e^i lambda_j a_j is a 3x3 second rank SU(3) tensor and the psi accordingly becomes an SU(3) vector (with four-component Dirac structure implied). Even with this analogy, it is not clear how to structure PSI or a complex exponential containing /\^u. It seems that e^i/\^u needs to be made into a second rank (spacetime) tensor and PSI into a (spacetime) vector to maintain the structure of PSI (which we can do by an index summation), but that would seems to mess up the transformation h_uv --> h_uv' = h_uv + d_u /\^v + d+v /\^u. Can someone please elucidate how this all hangs together, if this is known? Thanks. Jay. _____________________________ Jay R. Yablon Email: jyablon@nycap.rr.com |
| PhysOrg.com |
physics news on PhysOrg.com >> Promising doped zirconia >> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease >> Bringing life into focus |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Large gauge transformations of QCD in the temporal and in the Nakanishi Lautrup gauge | High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics | 0 | ||
| eigenfunctions versus wavefunctions | Quantum Physics | 5 | ||
| Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED | General Physics | 0 | ||
| General relativity versus black holes | General Physics | 29 | ||
| Re: General relativity versus black holes] | General Physics | 0 | ||