Gibbs sum


by stunner5000pt
Tags: gibbs
stunner5000pt
stunner5000pt is offline
#1
Nov24-06, 08:29 PM
P: 1,445
a) Consider a system that may be unoccupied with energy zero or iccuped by one particle in either of two states, one of zer oeenrgy and one of energy epsilon. Show taht the Gibbs sum for this system is

[tex] z = 1 + \lambda / \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau) [/tex]

b) Show that the thermal average occupancy of the ssytem is
[tex] <N> = \frac{\lambda + \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau)}{z} [/tex]

c) show that the thermal average occupancy of the state at eneryg = epsilon is
[tex] <N(\epsilon)> = \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau)/z [/tex]

d) Find an expression for the theram laverage eneryg of the system
e) Allow the possibility tat the orbital at 0 and at epslon may be occupied each by one particle at the same time, show that
[tex] z = 1 + \lambda + \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau) + \lambda^2 \exp(-\epsilon/\tau) = (1+ \lambda) [1 + \lambda \exp(\epsilon/\tau)] [/tex]


I will post my attempted solutions in a seaparate post.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
stunner5000pt
stunner5000pt is offline
#2
Nov24-06, 08:43 PM
P: 1,445
The Gibbs Sum or grand sum is given by

for this problem at least...
[tex] z = \sum_{N=0}^{1} \sum_{s(0)}^{s(1)}} \exp\left(\frac{N\mu-\epsilon_{s(N)}}{\tau}\right) [/tex]

which comes out to

[tex] z = \sum_{N=0}^{1} \exp(\frac{N\mu}{\tau}) + \exp\left(\frac{N\mu-\epsilon_{s(N)}}{\tau}\right) [/tex]

whic his

[tex] z = \exp(0) + \exp(\frac{\mu}{\tau}) + \exp(\frac{\mu-\epsilon}{\tau} [/tex]
a term is missing because there is NO energy contribution by the s(0) state.

also we defined lambda like [itex]\lambda = \exp(\mu/\tau}[/itex]

so
[tex] z = 1 + \lambda + \lambda \exp(\epsilon/\tau) [/tex]

for b) similar concept applies

c) What is the diff between <N> and <N(epsilon)>?? Is N(epsilon)_ the number of particles whose energy actually contributes??

d) [tex] <\epsilon_{s(N)}> = \frac{\sum_{N=0}^{1} \sum_{s(0)}^{s(1)} \epsilon_{s(N)} \exp((N\mu-\epsilon)/\tau)) }{z} [/tex]

[tex] <\epsilon_{s(N)}> = \sum_{N=0}^{1} \frac{\epsilon_{s(N)}\exp(\frac{N\mu-\epsilon}{\tau})}{z} [/tex]

[tex] <\epsilon_{s(N)}> = \exp(\frac{\mu-\epsilon}{\tau})}{z} = \lambda\exp(-\epsilon/\tau) [/tex]

e) i Dont quite understand

are they saying that we should accomodate N=1 only?? And N=0 is no more valid
_Andreas
_Andreas is offline
#3
Nov27-06, 10:33 AM
P: 144
c) <N> is the average number of particles in the system, all energies included. <N(epsilon)> is the average number of particles with the particular energy epsilon in the system.

_Andreas
_Andreas is offline
#4
Nov27-06, 10:42 AM
P: 144

Gibbs sum


d) The possible combinations are N=0, E=0; N=1, E=0; N=1, E=epsilon. You are on the right track in your first two attempts, so I think you should be able to figure it out from here.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Gibbs energy.....help...... Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 0
The Gibbs phenomenon Calculus 2
Gibbs' Paradox Classical Physics 7
Gibbs sum Introductory Physics Homework 0
Gibbs paradox Classical Physics 1