LINEAR ALGEBRA - Describe the kernel of a linear transformation GEOMETRICALLY


by VinnyCee
Tags: algebra, geometrically, kernel, linear, transformation
VinnyCee
VinnyCee is offline
#1
Dec3-06, 04:54 AM
P: 492
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

For two nonparallel vectors [itex]\overrightarrow{v}[/itex] and [itex]\overrightarrow{w}[/itex] in [itex]\mathbb{R}^3[/itex], consider the linear transformation

[tex]T\left(\overrightarrow{x}\right)\,=\,det\left[\overrightarrow{x}\,\,\overrightarrow{v}\,\,\overrightarrow{w}\right][/tex]

from [itex]\mathbb{R}^3[/itex] to [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]. Describe the kernel of T geometrically. What is the image of T?



2. Relevant equations

I have no idea. Maybe the equations on how to find a kernel and image?

3. The attempt at a solution

I don't know where to even start this exercise! How does one "describe geometrically"?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
matt grime
matt grime is offline
#2
Dec3-06, 05:19 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 9,398
Given v and w, when does it vanish? No equations, nothing like that, just a simple statement of what it means when det vanishes. If you just use words, you'll be describing it geometrically. For instance, fix a y, and take the linear map

L_y : x--> x /\y

which takes x and sends it to the vector product of x and y, then the kernel is the set of x that are parallel to y (or the line spanned by y). That is a geometrical description of the kernel.

The point is that you could let x=(x_1,x_2,x_3) and v=(v_1,v_2,v_3) etc and write down an equation f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=0 with coefficients the v_i, w_i which parametrizes the kernel, but it would be incredibly unhelpful when there is a far simpler description.
radou
radou is offline
#3
Dec3-06, 05:19 AM
HW Helper
radou's Avatar
P: 3,225
What is the definition of a kernel? How does that apply in your case? What is the geometrical representation of that?

Edit: too late, again.

VinnyCee
VinnyCee is offline
#4
Dec3-06, 08:22 PM
P: 492

LINEAR ALGEBRA - Describe the kernel of a linear transformation GEOMETRICALLY


Thank you for trying to explain this concept to me, however, I still do not understand!

Can you explain the formula [tex]L_y: x\,->\,x\,\bigwedge\,y[/tex]?

Is that also expressed as the "dot product"? The left of the equation reads "Linear transformation of y", right? [tex]L_y:\,x\,->\,\overrightarrow{x}\,\cdot\,\overrightarrow{y}[/tex]

Maybe if you just explain it in very precise terms that a "lay-person" would understand? I always have trouble with these dang kernels!

I know that a kernel is the functions or vectors that cause the transformation to be equal to zero (at least, I hope it is).
radou
radou is offline
#5
Dec4-06, 02:24 AM
HW Helper
radou's Avatar
P: 3,225
Quote Quote by VinnyCee View Post

I know that a kernel is the functions or vectors that cause the transformation to be equal to zero (at least, I hope it is).
More precisely, the kernelis the set of vectors that 'cause' the transformation to be equal to zero.
AKG
AKG is offline
#6
Dec4-06, 02:53 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,589
The formula [itex]L_y : x \mapsto x \wedge y[/itex] says that Ly is a function that maps x to [itex]x \wedge y[/itex]. The wedge product is a generalization of the cross product, not the dot product. The kernel of Ly is the set of vectors {x | Ly(x) = 0}, which is exactly the same thing as [itex]\{ x\, |\, x \wedge y = 0\}[/itex]. Like I said, the wedge product is just a generalization of the cross product, so it's probably easier for you to consider instead the function Cy defined by [itex]C_y : x \mapsto x \times y[/itex]. Then:

[tex]\mbox{Ker}(C_y) = \{ x\, |\, C_y(x) = 0\} = \{ x\, |\, x \times y = 0\}[/tex]

This set is obviously just the set of vectors perpendicular to y, because [itex]x \times y = 0[/itex] iff x and y are perpendicular. You know that, right?
HallsofIvy
HallsofIvy is offline
#7
Dec4-06, 06:32 AM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 38,894
This might help: For three vectors, [itex]\vec{x},\vec{u},\vec{v}[/itex],
[tex]det\left[\overrightarrow{x}\,\,\overrightarrow{v}\,\,\overrightarrow{w}\right][/tex]
also called the "triple" product, is [itex]\vec{x}\cdot\left(\vec{u} X \vec{v}\right)[/itex].
Of course, the dot product of two vectors is 0 if and only if they are perpendicular, and the cross product of two vectors is perpendicular to both of them. What does that tell you about the geometric relationship between [itex]\vec{x}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{u},\vec{v}[/itex] if this is equal to 0?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Finding range and kernel of linear transformation Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
[SOLVED] linear algebra - inner product and linear transformation question Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
[SOLVED] Linear Transformation (kernel) Calculus & Beyond Homework 0
Linear Algebra: Linear Transformation and Linear Independence Calculus & Beyond Homework 8
kernel and image of linear transformation Calculus & Beyond Homework 3