Pretty simple problem I thought.

  • Thread starter Thread starter land
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle in a piecewise potential energy function, specifically a semi-infinite square well. The original poster seeks to determine the conditions under which no bound stationary states exist and the conditions for exactly three stationary states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster discusses the potential energy function and attempts to relate it to known properties of a regular square well. They express uncertainty about the conditions for stationary states and the implications of the boundary conditions on the wavefunctions.
  • Another participant suggests starting with the wave equations for different regions and discusses continuity conditions at the boundaries, while questioning the validity of their assumptions.
  • Further, a participant raises a conceptual question about the existence of stationary states in a potential well, seeking clarity on the underlying principles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different aspects of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the behavior of the wavefunction at the boundaries, and there is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in solving for the constants in the wavefunctions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the piecewise nature of the potential and the specific conditions required for the existence of stationary states. There is a noted lack of consensus on the approach to take, and assumptions about the wavefunctions are being questioned.

land
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The potential energy of a particle is defined by the piecewise function:

V(x) = infinity if x<0
V(x) = -V0 if 0<x<b
V(x) = 0 if x>b

So it's like a square well with one side being infinite. I need to find the condition on V0 and b so that no bound stationary states exist, then for there to be exactly three stationary states.

Homework Equations



Uh.. not sure. For a regular square well, I have that if V0 > 0 there is at least one stationary state. So for there to be none, V0 has to be less than zero? But this isn't quite the same as a square well.

The Attempt at a Solution



See above. I also know that each stationary state must have a node at x=0. I just don't know how to put all this together..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
OK... could really use some help on this one. I thought if I started with the individual wave equations, I could figure it out. So for what I'm calling Region I, 0<x<b, I came up with [tex]\Psi=C_I^+cos[\sqrt{2m(V_0-\epsilon)}(\frac{x}{\hbar}})]+C_I^-sin[\sqrt{2m(V_0-\epsilon)}(\frac{x}{\hbar})][/tex], and for region II, x>b, [tex]\Psi=C_{II}e^{-\sqrt{2m\epsilon}(\frac{x}{\hbar})[/tex], where epsilon is the binding energy. I'm doing this based on the assumption that it's like a regular square well, so I have no idea if that's right or not. Now before I can impose the condition that there is no node at x=0, it seems like I should figure out the constants. To do that I tried to impose that the wavefunctions and their derivative are continuous at x=b.. but that still leaves you with 2 equations and 3 unknowns, so it can't be solved yet.

A nudge in the right direction (or even an acknowledgment that I'm totally wrong) would be much appreciated.
 
Hm.. could it be that I'm not explaining the problem clearly enough? Let me know if so. I tried to draw something to post here but it's sort of confusing. It's just a semi-infinite square well, as nearly as I can tell.. but I really think I'm doing this wrong.
 
let me rephrase.. how can it be that there are no stationary states in a potential well? i think if i can understand that, the rest of it will be easy.
 
Your wavefunction should vanish at x=0. There may be fewer constants than you think. Nudge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K