How do I solve the integral of ln(x+2) using integration by parts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JanusII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the integral of ln(x+2) using integration by parts, with specific limits of integration provided. Participants are exploring the connection between different integrals and the application of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup for integration by parts and question the correctness of their approaches. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between derivatives and integrals, as well as the proper application of integration by parts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning each other's methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding the setup of the integration by parts, and there is an acknowledgment of potential errors in the approaches taken.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about their understanding and recall of integration techniques, indicating a possible gap in knowledge or memory regarding the steps involved in solving these integrals.

JanusII
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. INT {-1 to 1} ln(x+2)dx
u=x+2
du=dx
1/(x+2)
When I use FTC, I get -.6667, not what I get with a calculator.

2. INT {2 to 3} dx/x^2-x
ln|x^2 -x|
then FTC, and different answer from calc.

I'm sure these are connected somehow. I havn't touched these in a long time, so I am guessing I am forgetting some step...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right about the connection.

1/(x+2) is the derivative of ln(x+2), not the integral. You need to go the other way. Let me know if this helps.
 
Well I tried the first one by parts.

u=ln(x+2)
du=1/(x+2) dx
dv=dx
v=x
xln(x+2) - Integral 1/(x+2)dx
u=x+2
du=dx
Int 1/u du
xln(x+2) - ln|x+2| {-1 to 1}
Not getting the correct answer I don't believe still, still doing something wrong?
 
Integration by parts is how I did it.
I am a little rusty, so bare with me...

I think you error lies in how you set up this part
xln(x+2) - Integral 1/(x+2)dx
You should have had ...-Integral x*1/(x+2)dx
because it is -Integral v du, and you let v=x.

I used a little substitution to simplify the (x+2) portion.
let s=x+2, this makes it a little easier to follow.

then you are solving int(ln(s)ds)
separate by parts into u=ln(s), du=1/s ds, dv=ds, v=s

Now you have s*ln(s)-int(s*(1/s) ds)
s*(1/s) = s/s = 1
so the int(s*(1/s) ds) becomes int(ds)

s*ln(s)-int(ds)
s*ln(s)-s

Now sub back (x+2) for s...
(x+2)*ln(x+2)-(x+2)

Like I said, I am a little rusty, but I feel good about this.
If anyone sees an error in my method, please let me know.
Also, if there is an easier way to go about this problem, that would be great to here too.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K