Here is the roulette cheat cookbook (Fake?)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thecourier
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of a cookbook claiming to provide methods for predicting where a roulette ball will land, particularly focusing on the mathematical formulas presented in the document. Participants explore the implications of these formulas and whether the document is genuine or a scam.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the authenticity of the cookbook, suggesting it may be a fake designed to deceive gamblers.
  • Another participant argues that the mathematics in the paper does not appear to be obviously fake, referencing the physics of roulette wheels.
  • Concerns are raised about the need for extreme precision for the methods to work effectively.
  • A participant challenges the correctness of a specific formula related to initial velocity, suggesting it may be misinterpreted as frequency instead.
  • There is acknowledgment of a potential misunderstanding regarding the mathematical notation used in the document.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the authenticity of the cookbook, with some believing it to be a scam while others defend the mathematical validity of its claims. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the document's legitimacy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of precision in the application of the methods discussed, and there are unresolved questions about the interpretation of specific mathematical terms used in the document.

thecourier
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi I've found this cookbook on web for predict where roulete drop the rim
here's link but if you look at page 18 you've found something strange...
(about decelleration on central rotor)

well V(t)=V0-kt
then x(t)=V0*t-k/2*t^2

ok then V0=(1+k/2*T0^2)/T0

where T0 is time for one revolution, ..?
so V0 is istantaneus velocity? It's so simple to calculate it? from a time
and a decelletation parameter? then look @ minimizing? this funtion is equal i-1!

so the question is but is a fake?
Thanks
link here
http://www.roulette-forum.de/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=318
 
Science news on Phys.org
That is put there to win more of your $.
 
Hi Meir Achuz,
so you think that this document isn't a fake althought I think that to work you'll need an extreme precision...

any other comment?
 
thecourier said:
Hi Meir Achuz,
so you think that this document isn't a fake althought I think that to work you'll need an extreme precision...

any other comment?
I think what he means is that it's designed by casinos and people that live off gamblers to convince gullible people to cheat the aforementioned casinos and hand them over all their money while doing so.
 
Thanks to all for comments,

to AlephZero:

I think that you r math skilled, so look at page 18 of the pdf,

I think that last formula @ the botton of the page isn't right
where
V0=(1+k/2*T0^2)/T0

What do you think?

to Unicyclist

your Idea is really really realistic. I agree.
 
thecourier said:
I think that last formula @ the botton of the page isn't right
where
V0=(1+k/2*T0^2)/T0

It looks right to me. Read the page carefully. It is not a velocity [itex]v_0[/itex], it is a frequency [itex]\nu_0[/itex]
 
:bugeye: gulp! yep ops you're right, thanks. :smile:


-----

any other people would leave a comment?
 
hi, i try to view your link http://www.roulette-forum.de/index.p...pe=post&id=318 but is in dutch. do you read it with the google translate??
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Graduate Basic Question That Will Eat Your Brains
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Exhaust and engine accoustics for asthetics and performance
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K