Gravitation/circular motion problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moebius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the calculation of linear speed at the Earth's equator due to its rotation, specifically questioning the application of centripetal acceleration in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate linear speed using a formula but questions why the centripetal acceleration formula yields a different result. Participants explore the implications of gravitational force and centripetal acceleration on perceived weight.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts of centripetal acceleration and gravitational force, with some providing insights into the relationship between these forces and how they affect weight. There is an exploration of different interpretations regarding the forces acting on a person standing on the Earth's surface.

Contextual Notes

There is an underlying assumption that the effects of Earth's rotation on weight and acceleration are being considered, with participants questioning the equilibrium state when accounting for centripetal acceleration.

Moebius
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm having a problem with the concept of one question, which goes like this:

Calculate the linear speed of a point on the Earth's equator due to the Earth's rotation.

They gave the radius of Earth on the equator as 6.4 * 10^6..

Therefore,
v = (2r * 6.4 * 10^6) / (24 * 3600)
= 465 m/s

My question is this:

Why can't we use the equation a = v^2/r to solve this question?

As in 9.8 = v^2/(6.4 * 10^6)
v^2 = (9.8)(6.4 * 10^6)
v = root of [(9.8)(6.4 * 10^6)]

The answer is different, and I don't really understand why. Would anyone explain this for me?

Thanks in advance. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Moebius
They gave the radius of Earth on the equator as 6.4 * 10^6..

Therefore,
v = (2r * 6.4 * 10^6) / (24 * 3600)
= 465 m/s

My question is this:

Why can't we use the equation a = v^2/r to solve this question?

As in 9.8 = v^2/(6.4 * 10^6)
v^2 = (9.8)(6.4 * 10^6)
v = root of [(9.8)(6.4 * 10^6)]

The answer is different, and I don't really understand why. Would anyone explain this for me?

Gravity pulls you towards earth; acceleration due to spinning actually tries to throw you away from the earth.
 
How much do you weigh?


Not trying to be nosy- just making the point that IF the acceleration due to gravity were precisely what is needed to keep you moving at the speed of rotation of the earth, the "net" downward force on you would be 0- you would weight nothing!

(I don't know about you but that is definitely not true for me!)
 
Originally posted by HallsofIvy
Not trying to be nosy- just making the point that IF the acceleration due to gravity were precisely what is needed to keep you moving at the speed of rotation of the earth, the "net" downward force on you would be 0- you would weight nothing!

That's actually how satelites, the space station, and space shuttles stay seemingly weightless.
 
Originally posted by Moebius
Why can't we use the equation a = v^2/r to solve this question?

As in 9.8 = v^2/(6.4 * 10^6)
v^2 = (9.8)(6.4 * 10^6)
v = root of [(9.8)(6.4 * 10^6)]
That "a" is the centripetal acceleration that you experience just standing "still". As Halls and ShawnD point out, that is not the acceleration due to gravity, g.

If you ignore the Earth's rotation, you would presume that you are in equilibrium when you are standing still. That means downward force (gravity) is balanced by the upward force (Normal force of the ground pushing you up).

If you include the Earth's rotation, you are no longer in equilibrium. You are now centripetally accelerated. So the forces no longer balance: the normal force pushing you up is less. That's why your apparent weight is less. As Halls said, if the Earth were spinning fast enough so that the centripetal acceleration equaled g, then there would be zero normal force: You'd be floating around. (That's what is meant by the term "weightless".)
 
Kwaze Moto
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K