How Rademacher Derived His Formula for Partitioning Integers

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Janitor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on Rademacher's formula for partitioning integers, specifically seeking to understand the derivation of the formula and the significance of the number 24 within it. The scope includes theoretical aspects of number theory and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a sketch of Rademacher's derivation and the role of the number 24 in the formula.
  • Another participant mentions that Rademacher utilized Farey sequences and Ford circles, suggesting these concepts may be relevant to understanding the formula.
  • A third participant notes they encountered the formula in a book by John Conway, which did not provide a derivation.
  • One participant makes a brief, unrelated comment comparing the situation to the solution of a third-degree equation.
  • A participant bumps the thread to encourage newer members to contribute insights.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the derivation of Rademacher's formula or the significance of the number 24, and multiple viewpoints and references are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference complex mathematical concepts such as Farey sequences and Ford circles, but the discussion lacks detailed explanations or definitions of these terms. There is also an absence of a clear derivation or mathematical steps leading to the formula.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in number theory, particularly those exploring integer partitions and Rademacher's contributions to the field.

Janitor
Science Advisor
Messages
1,108
Reaction score
1
Can anyone sketch out how Rademacher wound up with his formula for the number of ways to partition an integer? Or at least explain why the number 24 shows up in it?

(In the graphic link below, the A coefficients are themselves defined as a certain rather complicated sum of exponentials to the base e.)
 

Attachments

  • p1img1272.gif
    p1img1272.gif
    2.6 KB · Views: 497
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, Nate. In fact I grabbed the formula image file from that very page that you linked. I first came upon the formula in a layman's book on number theory by John Conway, but that book didn't offer a derivation if I recall.
 
Reminds of the solution to the third degree equation!
 
Bumping this up in case some of the newer members can provide some insight.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K