Avoiding A Crash Course In Planetary Defense

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course Crash Planetary
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the topic of planetary defense against asteroids and comets, particularly focusing on the potential threats posed by both large and smaller near-Earth objects. Participants explore various strategies for deflecting or neutralizing these threats, referencing recent events and conferences related to planetary defense.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about the low probability but non-zero risk of civilization-threatening impacts from asteroids or comets.
  • There is mention of smaller asteroids being more numerous and potentially causing localized damage.
  • Various methods for planetary defense are proposed, including nudging and nuclear options, as discussed at the recent Planetary Defense Conference.
  • One participant references a recent close approach of an asteroid, highlighting the importance of monitoring near-Earth objects.
  • Another participant questions the timing of the reported close approach, seeking clarification on the time zone of the event.
  • Further discussion includes a reference to different classifications of asteroids and their orbits, indicating a nuanced understanding of their dynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best methods for planetary defense, and there are varying opinions on the significance of recent asteroid approaches and classifications.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the effectiveness of proposed defense strategies remain unaddressed, and there is a lack of clarity on the implications of the asteroid classifications discussed.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
Avoiding A “Crash Course” In Planetary Defense

GARDEN GROVE, California – There is certainty in the thought that an asteroid or comet loitering in deep space has Earth’s name on it. While a civilization-snuffing impact is a low probability, it is not zero.

But there are other trouble-makers out there too. They are the smaller asteroids, and far more numerous. They too could mess up the day, but in a more localized way.

The technologies and techniques to defend Earth from such malicious cosmic interlopers were tackled at The Planetary Defense Conference: Protecting Earth from Asteroids held here February 23-26, and sponsored by The Aerospace Corporation and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).

How best to deflect or defeat nature’s own terrorist attack on our own planetary turf conjures up all kinds of thinking -- from nudging to nuking objects that have Earth in their cross-hairs. [continued]

http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/neo_defense_040310.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Let's expect that they have done the correct calculations in this case
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994793



"The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service



Closest asteroid to pass Earth approaches


12:27 18 March 04

NewScientist.com news service

An asteroid the size of a small office building will make the closest approach ever recorded to the Earth on Thursday evening

Discovered just two days ago by an automated telescope scanning the sky for near-Earth objects, asteroid 2004 FH will miss the planet by a mere 40,000 kilometres, just over a tenth of the distance to the Moon.

The previous record was set 27 September 2003, when 10-metre asteroid 2003 SQ222 missed the Earth by about twice that distance. However, that object came from inside the Earth's orbit, so its close approach was not recorded until it had passed the Earth."





Shivers
 
Last edited:
12:27 18 March 04

AM or PM? I presume Greenwich? In which case its way past as I post.
 
http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1218_1.asp, but since it's an http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/lists/Atens.html*, it will surely be back someday, maybe in the lifetime of many PF members :wink:

*"Atens have semimajor axes less than 1.0 AU, Apollos have perihelion distances less than 1.0 AU and Amors have perihelion distances less than 1.3 AU. Centaur objects have perihelia beyond the orbit of Jupiter and semimajor axes inside the orbit of Neptune. Transneptunian objects have orbits with semimajor axes beyond the orbit of Neptune--some of these objects, generally assumed to be in librations with Neptune, have perihelion distances inside the orbit of Neptune."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K