|Apr17-07, 02:37 PM||#1|
vortex tube application question
I recently invented a new application for vortex tube.
The application requires a very minimal flow of air at freezing temperature.
I wonder if it's possible to design a vortex tube at a very small size if only a very tiny air flow is required? Is flow rate proportional to physical size of the vortex tube?
How about cost? Is it possible to mass produce vortex tube for $20 or less?
|Apr17-07, 05:19 PM||#2|
You didn't say how small you wanted to make this vortex tube, but in principal, I don't see any reason you couldn't make it quite small. The lower flow rate will of course simply reduce the amount of 'refrigeration' you can obtain from the flow.
The only problem I see is heat transfer along the axial direction of the tube, but I have a hard time believing that would be very signficant, even using a highly thermally conductive material, because gas velocity is so high. If it turned out to be an issue, you could use a plastic which has a much lower thermal conductivity than metals.
As for mass producing them, if you made something on the order of a hundred or more, I suspect even a machined part could be brought under $20. Doing tens of thousands at a time might lend itself to a molded design in plastic and costs on the order of a few bucks or less.
|Apr17-07, 07:03 PM||#3|
Thanks a lot for the help.
I heard vortex tube only requires compressed gas as small as 80 psi. If the device is to be powered by an air tank, the air tank can be refilled at a gas station right?
Is the output cold air at atmospheric (ambient) pressure? Can flow rate be adjusted? Thanks.
I'm really interested in the vortex tube for my application but I'm new to them.
I appreciate your help.
|Apr18-07, 10:30 AM||#4|
vortex tube application question
|Apr19-07, 05:21 PM||#5|
Wow, it's nice to know the vortex tube can be made out of plastic. Can plastic ones perform just as good as the metal ones?
My application involves a vortex tube powered by a small air tank. The whole system is designed to be portable. It's important that the amount of air be used as efficiently as possible so that refills are not needed as often.
For the application I'm doing, I only need a very small cooling capacity, so only a very low air flow rate is required.
Is it possible to size/design the vortex tube so that the output flow is controlled to just the amount I need (for a given PSI air), so that it doesn't use up air too quickly and unnecessarily.
What I'm trying to ask is for a source of air at a given pressure, is the output air flow rate (hot air plus cold air) independent of the vortex tube or can the design of the vortex tube alter the rate at which the air get used? I heard there something called a "generator" that serves this function?
|May2-07, 02:40 AM||#6|
Heloo Guys Can some one provide vortex tube profile ...It would be gretaly apriciated if the drawing is provided with all pertaing deatils .You can also mail me on CaddPro@hotmail.com
|May11-07, 12:43 AM||#7|
The vortex tube air rate can be controlled by a standard variable air regulator. The smallest tube I have used is about 6 inches long and 5/8" diameter. The hot air is vented and the cold introduced to the place to be cooled. 30 lbs of air pressure is enough to operate the device. They use quite a lot of air for the amount of cooling gain. But beat a refrigeration compressor for portability. Use really good insulation to hold your cool.
|Jun6-07, 03:19 AM||#8|
I know that vortex tube requires air as motive fluid, is it possible to use water or some other liquid as motive fluid? If not, why not??
Any scientific explanation??
|Jun13-07, 03:11 AM||#9|
To the last poster: well you could use other kinds of
fluids, but I believe it's much easier with a gas because
the thermal conductivity of a gas is quite low compared
to most liquids, and because the gas can easily be made
to flow at high speeds / vorticities with low drag and
low friction. I believe those characteristics of gas vs.
liquids make the gas possibility much more practical
than the liquid one. It'd be interesting to study
the possibilities sciendifically, though.
To the original poster:
I'd think the air consumption rate would make a vortex
tube sourced with compressed air from a small portable
tank impractical. Even a large SCUBA tank at exceedingly
high pressure only holds 100 cubic feet of air relative to
atmospheric pressure. A small 175 PSI "5 gallon" tank
that you could refill at a service station holds even less
cubic feet. I don't know if you're talking about very
tiny dimensions (a few millimeters) here which might
consume only fractional parts of 1 CFM of air flow, but
for anything of a small but respectable size, you'll only
have minutes of cooling given the air supply.
IMHO I estimate that you'd be better off using a
straight SCUBA tank and expansion valve to create
freezing air straight from the expansion of the highly
compressed gases rather than trying to use a vortex tube
which would probably use more air for less cooling.
Even a 100-175PSI small tank of compressed cool or
ambient temperature air may perhaps be more
effectively used in cooling by simple expansion rather
than via a vortex tube, though I'm sure there are some
regimes of operation in which the vortex tube is
Another option that's inexpensive enough for use in
consumer electronics (portable DC powered beverage
coolers) is the peltier cooler which is a thermoelectric
device that can easily produce small areas of freezing
temperatures (given a stack of perhaps 2 junctions)
given something like a dozen watts of applied power,
though of course you'll have to efficiently dissipate
the waste heat from the other side of the device to the
ambient air to realize a cooling benefit from 'the cold side'
of the device.
Beyond these approaches, it's quite common to have
small sterling cycle coolers or other such refriigeration
devices that are even more efficient and
use electrically powered tiny motors/pumps for
specialized cooling of small areas, though usually they're
only either very expensive specialty items in limited
production or are produced in somewhat larger
numbers but only for specialty applications like their use
in thermal cameras so they're not so commonly available
as an "off the shelf" part. They're not so complex though
that they couldn't be produced cheaply in quantity given
sufficient funds to create the custom designed mechanism
in the first place.
The vortex tube is probably an OK idea though if you have
a larger capacity of compressed airflow available, though,
but, again, if the compressed air is at cool or ambient
temperatures to begin with, just expanding it from
a proper nozzle may produce all the cooling needed
without needing the vortex tube.
|Feb17-08, 01:26 PM||#10|
Hello. I came across this old thread and want to know if you or anyone here has been able to locate inexpensive vortex tubes. Most websites sell them for over $100 (metal) for the smallest 2 CFM models. Someone here also mentioned you could possibly use a plastic vortex tube but I have been unable to find any companies that make or sell them on the internet.
I would preferably like to a metal one as its conductive properties are much higher than that of plastic, however I believe a plastic one would also work for my needs as I don't need such drastic variantions in the temperatures produced.
I was hoping to find one under $40-50 or even cheaper. Can anyone recommend where to find vortex, plastic or metal, for under this price?
|Similar Threads for: vortex tube application question|
|vortex tube design||Mechanical Engineering||26|
|You tube video question||Computing & Technology||1|
|Harmonic Tube Question||Introductory Physics Homework||1|
|Fixed-Tube-Sheet Shell and tube Heat Exchanger||Materials & Chemical Engineering||1|
|cathode ray tube(CRT) question||Introductory Physics Homework||7|