Einstein's General and Special Theory of Relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Einstein's General and Special Theory of Relativity has been tested using atomic clocks, demonstrating time dilation effects as predicted by these theories. The discussion highlights that E=mc^3 lacks the correct dimensionality for energy, emphasizing the importance of dimensional analysis in theoretical physics. Furthermore, while the laws of physics are influenced by relativity, they are fundamentally based on empirical observations rather than solely on Einstein's theories. The conversation also touches on the role of differential equations in modeling physical phenomena, such as the motion of falling bodies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's General and Special Theory of Relativity
  • Familiarity with atomic clock experiments and time dilation
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Basic principles of differential equations and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research atomic clock experiments related to time dilation in relativity
  • Study the implications of dimensional analysis in theoretical physics
  • Explore the role of differential equations in modeling physical systems
  • Investigate alternative theories of physics beyond Einstein's relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of modern physics and their empirical validations.

Radiatedtheory18
i have a few questions about both of these theories that Einstein wrote.

1. Was one of these theories tested against 2 atomic clocks, one which is on Earth and the other on a fast jet going around the earth, both clocks syncronised and the results were different, which theory was tested with this?

2. E=MC2 vs E=MC3. would the laws of physics change if we had a formula E=MC3?.Would E=MC3not work due to that the tests of this formula would not be proved properly? Am i talking Theorectial Physics here lol?

3. I am aware that there are other formulas other than Einsteins one, i was thinking are all the laws of physics based on Einsteins Special and General Theory of Relativity? because the laws would have to have a base of some sort? do we base these laws from einsteins theories to come up with new formulas to work out specific solutions to problems involving physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
re - "1. Was one of these theories tested against 2 atomic clocks, one which is on Earth and the other on a fast jet going around the earth, both clocks syncronised and the results were different, which theory was tested with this?"

Yes.

re - "E=MC2 vs E=MC3. would the laws of physics change if we had a formula E=MC3?.Would E=MC3not work due to that the tests of this formula would not be proved properly? Am i talking Theorectial Physics here lol?"

I don't know. That's like asking what President Bush's personality would be like if he was someone else. However E = mc^3 does not have the dimensions of energy. It has the dimensionf of Energy*speed

re - "3. I am aware that there are other formulas other than Einsteins one, i was thinking are all the laws of physics based on Einsteins Special and General Theory of Relativity?"

No. Relativity makes statements about what the laws of nature are like. But only in that sense are they based on relativity. I.e. Relativity says the the laws of physics are the same in all coordinate systems.

Laws are based on observation.


Pmb
 
The only thing that we can observe is how the universe changes. In terms of mathematics this is differentials. We are able to express the changes we observe in the universe as mathematical differentials. Thus we create a differential equation which models the changes of the universe. It seems that solutions of these differential equations are accurate reflections of actual events. Thus we are able to make predictions based on solutions of differential equations. For example.

We have observed that the acceleration due to gravity is a constant, thus a falling body experences a constant acceleration. Mathematically we say x'' = -g . Where x'' is the second deriviative of x with respect to time. Solution of this differential equation is

x = -(gt^2)/2 + V0t + x0

the equation of motion for a falling body.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K