Calculating Maximum Height of a Child Swinging from a Rope

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a child swinging from a rope, specifically focusing on calculating the maximum height reached by the child based on their initial speed and mass. The subject area includes concepts of energy conservation and kinematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the conservation of energy principle to find the maximum height and expresses confusion regarding the second part of the problem, questioning how different masses can achieve the same height with varying speeds.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the problem, noting that mass does not affect the outcome in this context, which may help clarify the original poster's confusion. However, the discussion includes varied interpretations and does not reach a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses urgency in seeking help, indicating a time constraint for resolving the problem. There is also a note about the age of the question being discussed, which some participants question.

kassy_in_the_sky
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Several children, pretending they are playing in the jungle, suspend a rope from an overhead tree limb. A child of mass 40 kg running at 8.0m/s grabs the rope and swings off the level ground.

a) What maximum height does the child reach?
b) How fast would a 30 kg child have to run to reach the same height as the 40 kg child?


½mv1²+mgh1 = ½mv2²+mgh2

a) m=40kg, v1=8.0m/s, h1=0m, g=9.8m/s², v2=0m/s (at max height v=0)

h2=?

½mv1²+mgh1 = ½mv2²+mgh2

½mv1²= mgh2

h2 = 3.27m = 3m (is this correct?)

im really confused with B... coz i got 8m/s... it doesn't make sense to me how they can run at the same speed and achieve the same height??!

this is really urgent... so please help me! >_< thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that the mass drops out of the equations entirely. So the mass has no significance to the problem.

Intuitively, if you increase the mass, the person has greater kinetic energy when he starts. But getting to the same height also requires more energy. It works out that the increases in energy are identical.

cookiemonster
 
thanks! ^^
 
I believe that:

1. The initial inertial velocity is a convention between the different reference frames.

2. The total tensional energy of an isolated system is equal to zero.

3. The total energy of an isolated system is equal to zero.



Antonio A. Blatter
 
Unfortunately, you're responding to a question that's about 4 years old.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Unfortunately, you're responding to a question that's about 4 years old.

Zz.

Hmm, why is that frowned upon? I mean, physics problems are timeless afterall :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K