| Thread Closed |
the impossible lost city "Mega". |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| May6-07, 03:41 AM | #1 |
|
|
the impossible lost city "Mega".
We have been there several times:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=6347 http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=38797 http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=86402 I have said on several occasions that something unexplanable like this tends to be forgotten as soon as possible. it only fuels crackpots with fantastic Atlantis stories. And if we cannot explain it, it should not exist. Evidence for that attitude is the failure to really exploit this site systematically. Only the discoverers were attempting to do so until their funding dried up. But ever increasingly harder evidence doesn't go away. New activities here. What would this evidence mean for a certain pet idea? |
| May7-07, 09:41 PM | #2 |
|
|
WHAT!?!?!?!?
|
| May8-07, 03:43 AM | #3 |
|
|
Well, I would say, that's an confirmed recurring observation. For instance for climatology and evidence *against* the explanation of the Pleistocene Ice Ages is the wide spread Northern Hemisphere mega fauna steppe with a dense population of horses, antilopes, lions up until way above the Artic circle in Siberia, oh yes, also mammoths, but weren't those just walking around in a constant blizzard? Ice age movies?
More here: page 4 second half http://home.wanadoo.nl/bijkerk/refut...ermometer1.pdf The disdaining of those animals for the explaination of the ice cores, caused it not to exist in the IPCC reports up until the last assessment report of the IPCC. There is also something very wrong with the current ideas about isostacy tectonics if Wuchang Wei is right: http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/c...tract/30/4/379 But yesterday (after I wrote that) I received a new promising study about the last glacial termination with the gist: we don't understand a thing of it, falsifying my idea. It's from Pages Past Global changes: Do we finally begin to understand that our interpretation of the proxies of the past is often wrong and that something completely different happened? |
| May8-07, 04:06 AM | #4 |
|
|
the impossible lost city "Mega".
Just a thought about sea level changes... I get the impression that there are a lot of problems with our understanding of vertical crustal movements. As far as I am aware, the jury is still out on how the Lizard ophiollite and SW U.K. batholith came to be uplifted to the height that they are. There is also evidence that mountain building can happen a lot faster than previously thought (link) so perhaps crustal movements rather than absolute sea level change could be responsible.
|
| May8-07, 04:30 AM | #5 |
|
|
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=165114 |
| May8-07, 02:21 PM | #6 |
|
|
So by your logic your statement that I quoted doesn't exist because I can't explain the logic behind it. THEREFORE YOU DO NOT EXIST!!!!!
|
| May8-07, 02:36 PM | #7 |
|
|
I think you two may have missed the point of that statement slightly...
|
| May8-07, 03:00 PM | #8 |
|
|
What point did I miss?
|
| May8-07, 06:48 PM | #9 |
|
|
There seems to be a lot of submerged megalithic, sophisticated and presumably prehistoric monumental structures. Here's one off the southern Japanese island of Okinawa.
http://www.lauralee.com/japan/japan2.htm And India's getting in on the action! Apparently the straw found mixed with the ceramic building bricks at the site dates (C14) the city to approx. 9500 BP. |
| May9-07, 03:56 PM | #10 |
|
|
That's cool stuff, sunken cities a dozen or so fathoms deep are getting increasingly common. The problem with the Cuban site, Mega, is that it's about 2000 feet deep. That's the impossible part as sea levels were supposed not to have risen more than about ~400 feet after the last ice age, while the rise started 19000 years ago.
That's the puzzle. |
| May9-07, 07:52 PM | #11 |
|
|
|
| May10-07, 12:21 AM | #12 |
|
|
http://www.medioambiente.cu/museo/exmari.htm No peer reviewed publication. Nothing. |
| May10-07, 03:54 AM | #13 |
|
|
maybe it slipped off the ocean shelf in some kind of mega landslide??
Disclaimer: note that i know about as much about this case study as i know about the stock market, i.e. nothing. |
| May10-07, 10:17 AM | #14 |
|
|
Problem is that you'd have to come up with a scenario that did not destroy it. So no caldera stuff or slides I'm afraid.
How about a pulsating equator? |
| May10-07, 10:39 AM | #15 |
|
|
I know little to nothing about this subject, but it is very interesting. I suppose a civilization that built this city when the sea level was at its lowest level, the Gulf of Mexico could have been a closed in sea like the Black Sea. If that were so (the Strait of Florida being a land bridge to Cuba) then the Yucatan Channel would be like the Bosporus with two levels of water flow (dense sea water flowing in below less dense fresh water flowing out). As the sea level rose, before the Florida Strait overflowed, Sea water flow in would have become huge. This could have cut a channel under the city of Mega causing it to fall almost intact to its current level.
How does a pulsating equator cause this? |
| May10-07, 11:11 AM | #16 |
|
|
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=165114 Suppose that the geoide shape of the Earth was a little variable, but sea level is not, then a pulsating earth causes tremendous sea level changes. |
| May10-07, 09:47 PM | #17 |
|
|
One major criticism I have of that diagram, is it says that the ocean volume increases. How in nature does that occur?
Edit: oh yeah, thermal expansion, doh! |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: the impossible lost city "Mega".
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Impossible "angular acceleration" problem | Introductory Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Impossible to "pick" a field | Academic Guidance | 8 | ||
| "I lost all faith in my education" (mentally) | General Discussion | 50 | ||
| Update on the lost Cuban "City" | Earth | 17 | ||
| Access 2000 error, "Network connection may have been lost," might indicate Vbe6.dll conflict | Computing & Technology | 0 | ||