Thread Closed

the impossible lost city "Mega".

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May6-07, 03:41 AM   #1
 
Blog Entries: 2
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

the impossible lost city "Mega".


We have been there several times:

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=6347
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=38797
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=86402

I have said on several occasions that something unexplanable like this tends to be forgotten as soon as possible. it only fuels crackpots with fantastic Atlantis stories. And if we cannot explain it, it should not exist. Evidence for that attitude is the failure to really exploit this site systematically. Only the discoverers were attempting to do so until their funding dried up.

But ever increasingly harder evidence doesn't go away. New activities here.

What would this evidence mean for a certain pet idea?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
earth sciences news on PhysOrg.com

>> NASA's Landsat satellite looks for a cloud-free view
>> The tropical upper atmosphere 'fingerprint' of global warming
>> Volcanoes cause climate gas concentrations to vary
May7-07, 09:41 PM   #2
Tsu
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Andre View Post
...And if we cannot explain it, it should not exist.

WHAT!?!?!?!?
May8-07, 03:43 AM   #3
 
Blog Entries: 2
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Well, I would say, that's an confirmed recurring observation. For instance for climatology and evidence *against* the explanation of the Pleistocene Ice Ages is the wide spread Northern Hemisphere mega fauna steppe with a dense population of horses, antilopes, lions up until way above the Artic circle in Siberia, oh yes, also mammoths, but weren't those just walking around in a constant blizzard? Ice age movies?

More here: page 4 second half

http://home.wanadoo.nl/bijkerk/refut...ermometer1.pdf


The disdaining of those animals for the explaination of the ice cores, caused it not to exist in the IPCC reports up until the last assessment report of the IPCC.

There is also something very wrong with the current ideas about isostacy tectonics if Wuchang Wei is right:

http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/c...tract/30/4/379

Wuchang Wei, 2002, Beijing inundated by the sea within the past 80 k.y.: Nannofossil evidence; Geology; April 2002; v. 30; no. 4; p. 379-381

ABSTRACT

Examination of published data reveals that a marine bed in Beijing can be dated as 80 ka or younger on the basis of abundant nannofossils. This age is 30 times younger than that published previously on the basis of magnetostratigraphic and biostratigraphic interpretations. The abundant nannofossils and foraminifers suggest that Beijing was inundated by the sea within the past 80 k.y. The very recent nature of this marine transgression has profound societal and geological implications and thus calls for new studies and thorough evaluation of all relevant data sets.
So where are all those new studies, called for, 5 years after date? Anybody working on that? Where is the curiousity of science? Cognitive dissonance? If we have no idea what's going on and no clue what to look for and how to tackle it, then it should not exist?

But yesterday (after I wrote that) I received a new promising study about the last glacial termination with the gist: we don't understand a thing of it, falsifying my idea.

It's from Pages Past Global changes:

GH Denton, WS Broecker, RB Alley,2006; The mystery interval 17.5 to 14.5 kyrs ago, Pages Volume 14 No 2 August 2006, pp14-17

Abstract
The time period between the beginning of Heinrich event #1 (H-1) and the onset of the Bølling/Allerød rivals the Younger Dryas in importance to our understanding of how the planet responds to abrupt mode switches. This interval also constitutes the onset of the most recent termination, arguably the most fundamental climate shift of the last 100-kyr glacial cycle. As some of the responses during this time appear to be mutually contradictory, we term it the “Mystery Interval”.
As usually drop me a PM for sending (>8MB)

Do we finally begin to understand that our interpretation of the proxies of the past is often wrong and that something completely different happened?
May8-07, 04:06 AM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member

the impossible lost city "Mega".


Just a thought about sea level changes... I get the impression that there are a lot of problems with our understanding of vertical crustal movements. As far as I am aware, the jury is still out on how the Lizard ophiollite and SW U.K. batholith came to be uplifted to the height that they are. There is also evidence that mountain building can happen a lot faster than previously thought (link) so perhaps crustal movements rather than absolute sea level change could be responsible.
May8-07, 04:30 AM   #5
 
Blog Entries: 2
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by matthyaouw View Post
Just a thought about sea level changes... I get the impression that there are a lot of problems with our understanding of vertical crustal movements. As far as I am aware, the jury is still out on how the Lizard ophiollite and SW U.K. batholith came to be uplifted to the height that they are. There is also evidence that mountain building can happen a lot faster than previously thought (link) so perhaps crustal movements rather than absolute sea level change could be responsible.
Thanks, appreciate the link, I'm collecting anonalies. It appears that we may be closing in on scenarios like this:

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=165114
May8-07, 02:21 PM   #6
 
Quote by Andre View Post
And if we cannot explain it, it should not exist.
Wtf? So UFOs don't exist because we can't explain them when clearly they do? (and I don't mean aliens, I mean any airborne object that is not identified by scientists or the military. Remember those weird lights over that city somewhere that appeared in some year that haven't been explained at all).

So by your logic your statement that I quoted doesn't exist because I can't explain the logic behind it. THEREFORE YOU DO NOT EXIST!!!!!
May8-07, 02:36 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
I think you two may have missed the point of that statement slightly...
May8-07, 03:00 PM   #8
 
What point did I miss?
May8-07, 06:48 PM   #9
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
There seems to be a lot of submerged megalithic, sophisticated and presumably prehistoric monumental structures. Here's one off the southern Japanese island of Okinawa.

http://www.lauralee.com/japan/japan2.htm

And India's getting in on the action!

Wednesday February 9, 1:50 PM

Scuba-dive and view Krishna's Dwarka

By Ashish Mehta, Indo-Asian News Service




Ahmedabad, Feb 9 (IANS) People can now catch a glimpse of Lord Krishna's fabled underwater Dwarka city off the Gujarat coast.

An adventure sports company is launching scuba diving facilities near the pilgrimage town of Dwarka, 457 km here, which will enable the divers to glimpse the underwater "Bet Dwarka".

"It will be the first time in India and probably in the world where people can dive and see an ancient submerged city," Adventures Sports Limited marketing executive S.K. Singh told IANS.

The city-based Adventure Sports will sign a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the state government Thursday.

The MoU proposes two projects at an estimated cost of Rs. 130 million. Apart from Bet Dwarka, the firm will also offer scuba diving facilities at Marine National Park, near Jamnagar, 313 km from here.

"The feasibility study of the Jamnagar project is awaited," Singh said.

Lord Krishna's Bet Dwarka was long believed to exist only in the realm of mythology, before the Archeological Survey of India (ASI) conclusively proved its existence on the basis of underwater findings.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/050209/43/2jhw3.html

Apparently the straw found mixed with the ceramic building bricks at the site dates (C14) the city to approx. 9500 BP.
May9-07, 03:56 PM   #10
 
Blog Entries: 2
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
That's cool stuff, sunken cities a dozen or so fathoms deep are getting increasingly common. The problem with the Cuban site, Mega, is that it's about 2000 feet deep. That's the impossible part as sea levels were supposed not to have risen more than about ~400 feet after the last ice age, while the rise started 19000 years ago.

That's the puzzle.
May9-07, 07:52 PM   #11
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Andre View Post
That's cool stuff, sunken cities a dozen or so fathoms deep are getting increasingly common. The problem with the Cuban site, Mega, is that it's about 2000 feet deep. That's the impossible part as sea levels were supposed not to have risen more than about ~400 feet after the last ice age, while the rise started 19000 years ago.

That's the puzzle.
Have any geologists weighed in their opinion on this anomaly? I'm pretty sure they could point to an event that dropped the crust by that amount in that region. Pretty sure but I don't know.
May10-07, 12:21 AM   #12
 
Blog Entries: 2
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by baywax View Post
Have any geologists weighed in their opinion on this anomaly? I'm pretty sure they could point to an event that dropped the crust by that amount in that region. Pretty sure but I don't know.
Not really, that's why I opened with:

I have said on several occasions that something unexplanable like this tends to be forgotten as soon as possible.
The only geologist who described the phenomonon is Manuel Itturalde Vinent, in a web page,

http://www.medioambiente.cu/museo/exmari.htm

No peer reviewed publication. Nothing.
May10-07, 03:54 AM   #13
 
maybe it slipped off the ocean shelf in some kind of mega landslide??

Disclaimer: note that i know about as much about this case study as i know about the stock market, i.e. nothing.
May10-07, 10:17 AM   #14
 
Blog Entries: 2
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Problem is that you'd have to come up with a scenario that did not destroy it. So no caldera stuff or slides I'm afraid.

How about a pulsating equator?
May10-07, 10:39 AM   #15
 
I know little to nothing about this subject, but it is very interesting. I suppose a civilization that built this city when the sea level was at its lowest level, the Gulf of Mexico could have been a closed in sea like the Black Sea. If that were so (the Strait of Florida being a land bridge to Cuba) then the Yucatan Channel would be like the Bosporus with two levels of water flow (dense sea water flowing in below less dense fresh water flowing out). As the sea level rose, before the Florida Strait overflowed, Sea water flow in would have become huge. This could have cut a channel under the city of Mega causing it to fall almost intact to its current level.

How does a pulsating equator cause this?
May10-07, 11:11 AM   #16
 
Blog Entries: 2
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by PRDan4th View Post
How does a pulsating equator cause this?
Some ideas

http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=165114

Suppose that the geoide shape of the Earth was a little variable, but sea level is not, then a pulsating earth causes tremendous sea level changes.
May10-07, 09:47 PM   #17
 
One major criticism I have of that diagram, is it says that the ocean volume increases. How in nature does that occur?

Edit: oh yeah, thermal expansion, doh!
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: the impossible lost city "Mega".
Thread Forum Replies
Impossible "angular acceleration" problem Introductory Physics Homework 0
Impossible to "pick" a field Academic Guidance 8
"I lost all faith in my education" (mentally) General Discussion 50
Update on the lost Cuban "City" Earth 17
Access 2000 error, "Network connection may have been lost," might indicate Vbe6.dll conflict Computing & Technology 0