
#1
May707, 04:09 PM

P: 338

In Newtonian Physics, a force on a object is equal to its mass times acceleration. This is Newton's Second Law. But in relativity, when the acceleration approaches the speed of light, Newton's Second Law starts to become less accurate because to accelerate a mass more you must keep adding more energy. So in relativistic terms, what equation is there that holds up to speeds near the speed of light?
Thanks 



#2
May707, 04:29 PM

P: 2,043

Hi, Hover,
But the difference is that A is a 4vector. A is the 4acceleration vector which is basically the derivative of the 4velocity vector with respect to proper time. And the 4velocity vector is basically the change in direction in spacetime with respect to proper time. But note that we have four, not three, directions in spacetime! In addition there is the 4energymomentum vector which is mass times the 4velocity vector. Four vectors are simple and elegant. As you can see it is pretty straightforward, we simply have to add the extra direction in relativity. 



#3
May707, 06:45 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
P: 7,443

F = dP/dt is the relativistic equation that always holds. The exact form the equations take in terms of "mass" depend on whether or not one uses relativistic mass or invariant mass. Note that all of the quantities above depend on the observer, including the force. You will find that the ratio F/a depends on the direction of the force, assuming all measurements are done in the lab frame. This is sometimes discussed under the names "longitudinal mass" and "transverse mass" in older physics books. I thought there was a FAQ in the sci.physics.faq that had these formulas for F/a, but I couldn't find it offhand. Perhaps someone else will have better luck. The equations for relativistic momentum in the lab frame are Px = gamma m vx Py = gamma m vy Pz = gamma m vz where m is the [b]invariant mass[b], sometimes called the rest mass, of the particle. and gamma = 1/sqrt{1  vx^2  vy^2  vz^2} Differentiating the above expression for relativistic momentum will give the correct force / acceleration relationships assuming the forces and the accelerations are measured in the laboratory frame. Sometimes, accelerations are measured in the frame of the object being accelerated, such as in the relativistic rocket. These are often called proper accelerations. If you are interested in the velocity of a travel accelerated at a constant 'felt' acceleration, you'll want to look at the FAQ on the relativistic rocket at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...SR/rocket.html 



#4
May707, 07:21 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,937

f=ma in relativistic terms
[tex]\frac{d\vec p}{dt}=m\frac{d}{dt}\left[\frac{\vec v}
{\sqrt{1{\vec v}^2}}\right] = m[\gamma{\bf a}+\gamma^3{\vec v}({\vec v}\cdot{\vec a})] =m\gamma^3[{\vec a}+{{\vec v}\times({\vecv}\times{\vec a})][/tex] 



#5
May707, 08:02 PM

Emeritus
Sci Advisor
P: 7,443

so v X a, for instance, becomes [tex] \vec{v} \times \vec{a} [/tex] and for good measure, v should probably be v to make it clear you're taking the norm and I suppose some warning about geometric units is called for (though you could always put in those annoying factors of c) 



#6
May807, 05:45 AM

P: 2,955

Pete 



#7
May807, 05:49 AM

P: 2,043





#8
May1007, 08:48 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,937

The Minkowski force is defined as [tex]{\cal F}^\mu=\gamma(dE/dt,dp/dt)[/tex]. Using that would eventually lead to the equation I gave for dp/dt, but not as easily. 


#9
May1207, 01:48 AM

P: n/a

I have searched for the relativistic acceleration formula involving Force and Mass for a while now. All I can remember is something like this:
a=f/(m(1v^2/c^2)^(3/2)) I know this is wrong. So can someone tell me the correct equation 



#10
May1207, 02:18 AM

P: 2,043





#11
May1207, 02:19 AM

P: 2,043

Is there perhaps anything wrong with using 4vectors in relativity? 


#12
May1207, 02:27 AM

P: n/a

So:
a=F/(M*SQRT(1v^2/c^2)) 



#13
May1207, 02:36 AM

P: 2,043

Prasanna, see for a good overview of 4vectors in relativity David Morin  4Vectors.
Morin, in his introduction writes: "Although it is possible to derive everything in special relativity without the use of 4vectors (and indeed, this is the route, give or take, that we took in the previous two chapters), they are extremely helpful in making calculations and concepts much simpler and more transparent." I cannot help but fully agreeing with Morin. 



#14
May1207, 03:15 AM

Mentor
P: 6,044

[itex]d \tau =dt/\gamma[/itex] gives [tex]\gamma \frac{d}{dt} = \frac{d}{d \tau}.[/tex] Thus, [tex]{\cal F} = \frac{dP}{d\tau},[/tex] where [itex]P[/itex] is 4momentum. 



#15
May1207, 04:13 AM

P: 2,955

Pete 



#16
May1207, 06:36 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 1,937

[tex]d{\vec p}/dt[/tex] is the force as given by the Lorentz force. [tex]m{\vec a}[/tex] could even be defined as "force" in SR if it was made clear that it just means [tex]m{\vec a}[/tex]. It is clearest if the word "force" is dispensed with in SR. 



#17
May1307, 11:04 PM

P: 42

Thre are two kind of "forces" in SR:
(1) One is "3force" which is the rate of change of "3momentum" with respect to "time" [tex]{\vec F}=\frac{d {\vec p}}{dt}=\frac{d{\vec u}}{dt}=m{\vec a}+m_0\frac{d\gamma}{dt}{\vec u}[/tex] where [tex]{\vec u}[/tex] is the 3velocity [tex]{\vec u}=\frac{d {\vec r}}{dt}[/tex] and [tex]{\vec a}[/tex] is the 3acceleration [tex]{\vec a}=\frac{d{\vec u}}{dt}[/tex], [tex]m=m_0\gamma[/tex] (2) Another one is "4force" which is the rate of change of "4momentum" with respect to "proper time" [tex]\tau = is/t[/tex] [tex]{\tilde F}=\frac{d {\tilde p}}{d\tau}=\frac{dt}{d\tau}\frac{d {\tilde p}}{dt} =\gamma \frac{d}{dt}({\vec p},imc)[/tex] where [tex]{\tilde p}=({\vec p},imc)[/tex] is the "4momentum, [tex]s=\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2c^2t^2}[/tex] is the "4distance" and [tex]\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1(u/c)^2}}[/tex], [tex]{\vec u}=(\frac{dx}{dt},\frac{dy}{dt},\frac{dz}{dt})=(u_1,u_2,u_3)[/tex], [tex]u=\sqrt{{u_1}^2+{u_2}^2+{u_3}^2}[/tex] . 



#18
May1307, 11:25 PM

P: 42

The name "force" should be defined as "rate of change of momentum" with respect to some kind of "time". We can write [tex]{\vec F}=m_0{\vec A}=
m_0 (\gamma {\vec a}+\frac{d\gamma}{dt}{\vec u})[/tex] and "define" [tex]{\vec A}=\gamma {\vec a}+\frac{d\gamma}{dt}\frac{{d\vec r}}{dt}[/tex] as some kind of "acceleration" if you like. However this "new acceleration" would not be "time rate of change of some kind of velocity" as you can see. The same happens to the 4force [tex]{\tilde F}[/tex] 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
relativistic vs nonrelativistic momentum  Introductory Physics Homework  3  
relativistic and not relativistic motions  Special & General Relativity  2  
The 'terms' like up above is very old and it doesn't work  Forum Feedback & Announcements  5  
x in terms of a  Introductory Physics Homework  5 