diffraction limit on resolution


by lovelylm1980
Tags: diffraction, limit, resolution
lovelylm1980
lovelylm1980 is offline
#1
Mar25-04, 10:49 AM
P: 18
Spy planes fly at extremely high altitudes (24.0 km) to avoid interception. Their cameras are reportedly able to discern features as small as 5.48 cm. What must be the minimum aperture of the camera lens to afford this resolution? (Use lambda = 550 nm.)

This problem is unfamiliar to me, I'm not sure if the eqtion I used is correct

a= lambda*length/d= (550e-9m)*(24e+3m)/5.48e-2m= 0.241m
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Sensitive detection method may help impede illicit nuclear trafficking
CERN: World-record current in a superconductor
Beam on target: CEBAF accelerator achieves 12 GeV commissioning milestone
Chi Meson
Chi Meson is offline
#2
Mar25-04, 12:31 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Chi Meson's Avatar
P: 1,772
Go to your text and look up "Rayleigh Criterion."
YOu have the general idea already, but for circular aperatures, there is a factor of 1.22 that is multiplied to the wavelength.

By the way, anyone, where does this 1.22 come from?
lovelylm1980
lovelylm1980 is offline
#3
Mar25-04, 12:41 PM
P: 18
got it thanks[:)]

Integral
Integral is offline
#4
Mar25-04, 03:28 PM
Mentor
Integral's Avatar
P: 7,290

diffraction limit on resolution


The given expression is the radius of the first dark ring in the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern for circular aperture.

The computation involves summing intensity contributions from each point of the aperture accounting for path length differences.

In Optics by Rossi 6 pages are committed to doing this computation for a rectangular aperture. For a circular aperture he simply presents the results and comments
The theory of Fraunhofer diffraction by a circular aperture requires more elaborate mathematical computations then that of the Fraunhofer diffraction by a rectangular aperture
Chi Meson
Chi Meson is offline
#5
Mar26-04, 08:07 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Chi Meson's Avatar
P: 1,772
Quote Quote by Integral
In Optics by Rossi 6 pages are committed to doing this computation for a rectangular aperture. For a circular aperture he simply presents the results and comments
So the math involve in producing this factor of 1.22 is absurdly difficult?
Integral
Integral is offline
#6
Mar26-04, 10:54 PM
Mentor
Integral's Avatar
P: 7,290
Quote Quote by Chi Meson
So the math involve in producing this factor of 1.22 is absurdly difficult?
I do not think it is absurdly difficult, it requires setting up and evaluating an involved integral. Rossi must have felt that going through the process for the simpler case, of a rectangular aperture, was more productive then doing the same math only more difficult integrals.

I am sure that if you searched through enough optics texts you will find it worked out some where.

I have the tools to figure it out in Rossi, but frankly it would take more time then I have to commit to it now.
Chi Meson
Chi Meson is offline
#7
Mar29-04, 11:53 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Chi Meson's Avatar
P: 1,772
I found it in my Blaker & Rosenblum textbook "Optics." It comes from the Fraunhoffer diffraction integral after it is crammed through a 2-dimensional Fourier transform. TO me, it looks nasty. There was a day I could blunder my way through it, but ... the sun went down.
Integral
Integral is offline
#8
Mar29-04, 01:57 PM
Mentor
Integral's Avatar
P: 7,290
Quote Quote by Chi Meson
I found it in my Blaker & Rosenblum textbook "Optics." It comes from the Fraunhoffer diffraction integral after it is crammed through a 2-dimensional Fourier transform. TO me, it looks nasty. There was a day I could blunder my way through it, but ... the sun went down.
My thoughts exactly. We have some common ground!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
What does position resolution (in %) mean? Is a low percentage better? General Physics 2
resolution of eye General Physics 5
eye resolution General Physics 1
Interference, Diffraction, Diffraction Grading General Physics 1
Diffraction limit on resolution Introductory Physics Homework 4