Step Down Potential Homework: Electron Beam Incident on V(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FunkyDwarf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a beam of electrons incident on a step potential energy defined as V(x) = 0 for x < 0 and V(x) = -V(nought) for x > 0. The participants are exploring the implications of the potential energy being negative and how it affects the energy of the electrons.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether it is valid to assume E > V given the negative potential and discusses the implications of different energy conditions. They also consider the possibility of splitting the problem into cases based on energy comparisons and the behavior of standing waves.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on boundary conditions and the calculation of reflection and transmission coefficients, indicating a direction for the original poster to follow. However, there is no explicit consensus on the assumptions regarding energy and potential.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion about the energy conditions and the implications of the potential being negative, which may affect their understanding of the problem setup.

FunkyDwarf
Messages
481
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A beam of electrons with number density 10^15 electrons/m is incident from the left on the step potential energy

V(x) = 0 for x< 0 and
-V(nought) for x > 0
The constant is positive so its a step down

Homework Equations


Various exponential equations and equations for wavenumber K


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok the thing I am confused about here is as follows: can we assume that E > V? i mean i would have said yes because you can't have something with negative energy, but then again the potential is effectively negative so I am not sure. If there's the case of E>v and E<V do we split it up into two cases? namley one where a decay occurs in the area where V = 0 (i know normally this doesn't happen but i assume we consider it relative to its surrounding, ie a lower potential) and another case where all that happens is the wavenumber changes and you still have two sets of standing waves.

Also we are asked to find the reflection and transmission coefficients: will these simply be the amplitudes of the exponentials going in certain directions?

Thanks!
-G
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The incoming wave is coming from the V=0 side, so you can assume E>0. Put in your boundary conditions (no incoming wave from the right etc), normalize flux, match amplitude and derivatives at the boundary. Transmission coefficient is then the ratio squared of the amplitude of the incoming wave to the outgoing wave. This is pretty standard stuff.
 
This is pretty standard stuff.
Yeh great way to help my confidence, make me feel stupid. Thanks for the info.
 
FunkyDwarf said:
Yeh great way to help my confidence, make me feel stupid. Thanks for the info.

Sorry, guess what I meant to say is that it is easy to find references and detailed solutions to problems like this. I had to look one up to remind myself how the parts worked as well. Didn't mean to imply it was 'obvious'. Just 'standard'.
 
no worries
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K