How Does Gravity Affect Space and Time Near Black Holes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the effects of gravity on space and time near black holes, focusing on concepts from general relativity, including time dilation, spatial contraction, and the behavior of objects in orbit around black holes. Participants examine theoretical implications and analogies related to these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that general relativity predicts space shrinks near heavy masses like black holes, suggesting that objects could be stored in orbit due to this contraction.
  • Others argue that tidal forces near black holes would shred objects, complicating the idea of using black holes as storage facilities.
  • A participant questions whether space stretches or contracts near black holes, expressing confusion over the effects of gravity on objects approaching a black hole.
  • Time dilation is discussed, with some stating that time slows significantly for objects in orbit, with extreme dilation occurring at the event horizon.
  • One participant mentions that gravitational forces increase rapidly as one approaches a black hole, leading to potential spaghettification due to differential gravitational pull.
  • Another participant introduces the "Schwarzschild metric," noting that definitions of "space" and "shrink" are not well defined in general relativity, and describes how transverse space shrinks while radial space expands near a black hole.
  • An analogy involving a bowling ball on a trampoline is used to illustrate the warping of spacetime around a black hole, suggesting that while space may appear to shrink, the underlying mechanics are more complex.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the nature of space and time near black holes, with no consensus reached on whether space shrinks or stretches, and how these effects manifest from different perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of spatial contraction and expansion, the dependence on specific definitions of space, and unresolved mathematical aspects related to the Schwarzschild metric.

Mike2
Messages
1,312
Reaction score
0
I wonder, doesn't GR predict that space shrinks near the surface of a heavy mass such as a black hole.

If you had the power to put and remove objects from orbit around a black hole, then wouldn't a black hole be a perfect storage fascility? You could put many large objects in orbit around a black hole, there size would shrink so that you could put a lot of large objects around what you would preceive from a distance to be a relatively small volume. Is this right?

If time also dialates near black holes, would you actually see anything orbiting? Or would it look to us far away as though it was standing still or moving very slowly?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wouldn't a black hole be a perfect storage fascility?

Well, you have the slight problem of tidal forces shredding whatever you're trying to store.
 
Hurkyl said:
Well, you have the slight problem of tidal forces shredding whatever you're trying to store.
Now I'm confused. Are you saying that space stretches out and elongates objects (to the point of shredding) that approach a black hole? I thought space contracted near black holes.
 
Mike2 said:
If time also dialates near black holes, would you actually see anything orbiting? Or would it look to us far away as though it was standing still or moving very slowly?

Don't take my word as gospel, cause I'm only an amateur of relativity.

Time will slow down quite considerably for the orbiting junk, depending of where it's orbiting. Take earth, for example: time goes 1.000000001 times slower at its surface! Time will only freeze at the event horizon, where time dilation is infinite.

The thing with extremely strong gravitational fields is that they increase very fast the closer you get to the source. Yeah, that's true for all gravitational fields, due to the inverse square law, but this time the difference in pull between your legs and your head is strong enough to pull you apart. See, if your feet are one meter away from a mass and your head two meters, the gravitational force will be four times stronger at your shoes (2^2:1^2). The difference in forces is what pulls your body to shreads or spaghetti.

Another problem I see are the orbital speeds, which are proportional to the intensity of the gravity. I haven't calculated it, but I'm guessing it can reach the speed of light at the event horizon (where photons are in orbit).

Gah, hope that informs you.
 
JJ said:
Don't take my word as gospel, cause I'm only an amateur of relativity.

Time will slow down quite considerably for the orbiting junk, depending of where it's orbiting. Take earth, for example: time goes 1.000000001 times slower at its surface! Time will only freeze at the event horizon, where time dilation is infinite.



Another problem I see are the orbital speeds, which are proportional to the intensity of the gravity. I haven't calculated it, but I'm guessing it can reach the speed of light at the event horizon (where photons are in orbit).

Gah, hope that informs you.
Thank you. But what I'd really after is a confirmation that space shrinks near black hole, etc.
 
Look into the "Schwarzschild metric." It depends on what you mean by "space" and what you mean by "shrink." You may think that I'm trying to argue semantics, but actually, when you study GR, you find that these notions are not all that well defined. Also, geodesics will diverge in the radial direction (from the pole of a geodesic coordinate system) and converge in the transverse plane (towards the pole) as time goes on. If you want to consider the metric as the most meaningful representation (as I would) of space, then transverse space shrinks and radial space expands near a black hole.
 
Yup -- you get squeezed together around the waist and pulled apart head-from-feet. You're spaghettified, as the common expression goes.

- Warren
 
I'm asking more from the perspective from far enough away. Woundn't it appear from a safe distance that large objects are occupying a smaller amount of space as viewed from all angles at safer distances (assuming they could survive and you could get them out)(also assuming that they don't actually cross the event horizion or collide with some other orbiting object)?

Thanks.
 
As for the shrinking aspect, here's an analogy. Since a black hole is severe warping of spacetime by a concentrated mass, you could think of a bowling ball and a trampoline. Put the bowling ball in the middle of the trampoline, and observe what happens. Of coarse you know that it will warp, but what happens to the springs? That's right, they expand, to make up for the fabrics shrinking in circumfrence. Now make the trampoline a sphere, and you have the reason why it shrinks.

Paden Roder
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K