Is the Mind the True Creator of Our Reality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahrkron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mind Source
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the relationship between the mind and reality, particularly whether the mind is the creator of our subjective experiences. Participants delve into philosophical implications, the nature of consciousness, and the distinction between subjective and objective reality.

Discussion Character

  • Philosophical exploration
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the mind acts as a filter for subjective experiences, influencing how individuals perceive reality.
  • Others argue that while the mind is crucial for conscious decisions, it is not the source of all things, suggesting that it serves more as a conduit for interpretation rather than a creator.
  • A participant questions whether the mind should be equated with the soul, indicating a distinction between the mind as a functional organ and the concept of a deeper self or consciousness.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that everything is subjective and that reality could be a product of individual imagination, reflecting frustration over the inability to grasp this concept fully.
  • One participant references a separate thread to clarify their belief in an objective reality, arguing that the mind helps make sense of external stimuli rather than creating reality itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the role of the mind in creating reality, with no consensus reached. Some support the idea of the mind as a creator, while others maintain that it merely interprets an objective reality.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include varying definitions of the mind and its relationship to consciousness and reality, with some assumptions about the nature of existence remaining unresolved.

ahrkron
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
755
Reaction score
2
:)

We wouldn't be complete without this post in the Philosophy forum, would we?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the mind is the filter for all that we experience subjectively...
 
(Briefly welcomes self)
I agree with Kerrie.
The mind is not the source of all things, but it is true that all of our conscious decisions come via the mind. It acts as the conduit from the interpretations of our perception, our memories and our instinct into actual action, not the beginning itself. Without input, the cpu of the mind is meaningless.
 
Boy, did you ever scare me, arkhron! I'll be posting the original posts from my "Hurdles" thread soon. I hope to get some responses.
 
Originally posted by ahrkron
:)

We wouldn't be complete without this post in the Philosophy forum, would we?


[?] I don't understand what you are saying exactly. Do you mean mind is the source of all for a human? You don't mean it's the sourse of the universe, for instance, do you?
 
Actually, I think ahrkron was making reference to lifegazer's hypothesis (that the Mind is the source of all things).
 
Yes, the brain is the organ of the mind. Therefore, would you consider the mind to be the soul or what?
 
Originally posted by MajinVegeta
Yes, the brain is the organ of the mind. Therefore, would you consider the mind to be the soul or what?

Are you asking about the Mind of lifegazer's hypothesis? Or are you asking about a human mind. If it is the latter, then the mind is not the soul, it is something that the center of consciousness (self, soul, however you'd like to refer to it) uses to control the brain, which - in turn - controls the rest of the body.
 
Originally posted by Kerrie
the mind is the filter for all that we experience subjectively...

I prefer to think the mind the is creator of everythign we experience. Everything is subjective and nothing is objective, this whole world could be a pigment of my imagination... and it annoys me how i can't seem to get it right.
 
  • #10
Originally posted by Jikx
I prefer to think the mind the is creator of everythign we experience. Everything is subjective and nothing is objective, this whole world could be a pigment of my imagination... and it annoys me how i can't seem to get it right.

Please see my "Hurdles to Lifegazer's hypothesis" thread. Even if you don't agree with what I say, it will help you see my side of the issue (in that I believe that there is an objective reality, and that our minds make sense of external stimuli).
 

Similar threads

Philosophy of Science: Discussing Maths, Physics, Mind, & AI
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Does True Randomness Exist or Is It Just an Illusion?
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
So what are dreams made of? How do they differ from our waking reality?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
High School Conflict between the conservation of matter and the rapid expansion of our universe
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Is Radical Idealism a Rejection of Mind-Independent Reality?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
High School Do Fictional Worlds Exist in the Multiverse?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Opinion on Effective Shoplifting Prevention Strategies
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Questions about Korzybski's ideas
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
How Do Our Brains Process Tasks Differently?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Does energy currency make sense?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K