What Speed Can a Cyclist Climb a Hill Using the Same Power as Descending?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skiboka33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a cyclist's ability to climb a hill using the same power output as when descending. The scenario includes parameters such as the cyclist's mass, speeds while descending, and the effects of friction modeled as proportional to the square of the speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between forces acting on the cyclist while descending and climbing, questioning the nature of friction and its calculation. There are attempts to derive the constant for friction and to relate power output to forces involved in both scenarios.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and values for constants, while others have raised concerns about the realism of the power output derived. Multiple interpretations of the forces at play are being explored, and there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or values.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about unit conversions and the implications of using different values for gravitational acceleration. Some participants express uncertainty about the realism of the calculated power outputs.

skiboka33
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
A bicyclist of mass 80kg (including the bike) can coast down a 4 degree hill at a steady speed of 6.0 km/h. Pumping hard, the cyclist can descend the hill at 30 km/h. Using the same ower, at what speed can the cyclist climb the hill? Assume the force of friction is proportional to the square of the speed; that is, Ff = bv^2, where b is constant.

thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check me on this, but can you say that when coasting downhill at 6 km/hr, the frictional force b * 6^2 is exactly equal (and opposite) to the effective force of gravity, which would be m * g * sin(4 deg)? If so, that would allow you to solve for b. If that is correct, then it would get you started on attacking the remainder of the problem.
 
that is incorrect. Frictional Force is the static friction coefficient*Force Normal which is perpendicular to the surfuace. so when on an incline it is not equal to m*g.
 
Jez,

I was thinking of it as a drag force, due mostly to wind resistance, but if you are correct in your post, then skiboka can throw my idea out the window, I guess.

I was thinking once skiboka had b figured, the next thing would be to calculate b * 30^2 to get the drag force at that speed, then subtract from it m * g * sin(4 deg) to get the force the rider is providing with his legs, and then multiply by the speed of 30 to get power.

Then for the uphill part of the problem, it would be a matter of finding speed v for which power required to go uphill at that speed plus power to overcome drag was equal to the power calculated previously.
 
Last edited:
i was thinking of friction between the tires and the surface. hmmmm... now you got me thinking again.
 
ok i found b to be 1.52

then i found Fapplied = bv^2 - mgsin@ = .0309

then i found power = F * v = .927

so F required = Fg + Ff right? which = 54.7 + 1.52v^2
P = (54.7 + 1.52v^2)(v) = ?

now what? did i mess up somewhere?
 
If you are going to work in MKS units, you need to convert 6 km/hr to m/s, which makes it 1.666 m/s. Thus, in MKS units, the value of b is actually 19.7. Then convert 30 km/ hr to m/s, which is 8.33 m/s. The force that the rider is applying to the bicycle going downhill is then 19.7 * 8.33^2 - 80 * 9.8 * 0.0697 = 1367 - 55 = 1312 Newtons. Power provided by the rider is 1312 * 8.33 = 10935 watts.

So the remainder of the problem is to find a value of v for which 10935 = b v^3 + v m g sin(4 deg). I get 8.1 m/s or 29 km/hr.

Note that I am approximating g as 9.8 m/sec^2. Maybe you have a more precise value of g to use.
 
Last edited:
Warning!

I calculated that the rider is capable of putting out 11 kilowatts. If you multiply kilowatts by 1.3 to get horsepower, that is 14 horsepower. That seems way too high, even for a short burst by human legs. So either the problem is not realistic, or I have goofed up. Check me carefully.
 
  • #11
Oops!

As I was posting the link, Doc Al was also doing that. :-p
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
29K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K