Powerless Transceiver: Bluetooth/802.11/27 MHz Range LAN Options

  • Thread starter Thread starter drag
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of a Bluetooth/802.11/27 MHz range LAN transceiver that operates without a coupled power source, potentially using energy harvested from received transmissions. Participants explore the technical requirements for such devices, including the necessary power output, distance, and communication protocols.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the possibility of a transceiver that operates solely on energy harvested from transmissions, suggesting it would require significant power output, low power consumption on the receiver, and close distances with focused antennas.
  • Another participant mentions existing technologies, such as infrared systems used in toll booths, which can provide enough power for battery-free operation, though they note this is not directly applicable to the Bluetooth/802.11 context.
  • A participant clarifies that many wireless devices like keyboards and mice currently rely on batteries, expressing interest in whether similar technologies could function without a power source.
  • There is a correction regarding the technology used in toll devices, with one participant asserting that they utilize radio frequency (RF) rather than infrared.
  • Further discussion introduces the concept of "multiple modulation modes" transponders and questions whether current protocols and devices could support such technologies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and existing technologies related to battery-free operation in wireless communication. There is no consensus on whether such transceivers can be developed or if current protocols would support them.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the power requirements and operational capabilities of proposed technologies, as well as the dependence on specific communication protocols.

drag
Science Advisor
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1
Greetings !

I was wondering if anybody heard of a bluetooth/802.11/
27 MHz range LAN transceiver (or maybe something like a
radio transducer) that can operate by using power from
received transmissions - thus requiring no coupled power source ?

Also, which of these protocols could allow it technicly in the first
place - that is, involves continuous control signals by the "main"
control unit or something, thus providing the necessary power
for the modulated or separate return signal transmission ?

Finally, if such transceiver circuits exist/are possible - would/do
they require non-standard improved receiving capability of the units
with which they communicate due to low transmission power ?

Thanks. :smile:

Live long and prosper.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That would require some serious power output from the transmitter, very low power consumption on the receiver, close distances, and focused antennas (to keep the power from spreading). And then to transmit data back? From a consumer standard?

If you're on a network, you're likely using some device that has its own power source. Tapping off that would be easy, especially with USB.

Cliff
 
drag,

Edit: I inadvertently ignored your bluetooth, 24MHz spec when I posted the following, which describes the IR (f>>24Mhz) technology for battery-free reception/transmission already in widespread use.

If I understand what you're asking, the answer is yes, and they're being used all over the place.

Those toll tags that let you drive through toll booths without stopping are infrared transmitter/receivers. A transmitter in the toll booth radiates an ir wave with sufficient power to provide the toll tag just enough energy for it to radiate an ir signal that identifies it to the toll booth as you drive by.

They've been used in agriculture for even longer to identify livestock as they move around and even keep track of how long each one spends at the feed trough etc.

I think Walmart has a pilot program going to identify and track their stock as it comes into the store and moves from the stock room to the retail shelves, to the cash registers, and out the door. The holygrail of this technology is tags so small and cheap they could be imbedded in every product, making the whole checkout process obsolete! They've got the "small" part nailed, but the tags still cost around 10c (I think). That has to come down closer to a penny for it to be economically viable. It'll happen!
 
Last edited:
Greetings !

O.K. I now about part of that stuff. To clarify
a bit, I'm referring more to various computer related
wireless appliances like keyboards, mice, joysticks
and stuff like that. I heard about the Microsoft wireless
keyboards and mice and bluetooth mice as well as similar
Logitech technology. They all use batteries, but the data
transfer rates are very low and they are all used in close
proximity to the computer system with short range wireless
protocols.

So, I was interested to find out weather there are
technologies out there that can do the same things
without a power source at all. I suppose it depends a lot
on the way the protocols work too.

Thanks. :smile:

Live long and prosper.
 
jdavel,

I believe what you're talking about actually RF devices. The tags are commonly called RFIDs. Futhermore, toll devices do not use infrared either; they also use radio.

- Warren
 
chroot,

Doh!

You're right. I was even thinking "RFID" in one part of my brain, but the part that wrote my post translated that into "something...something...intrared device". Maybe I need to get an EEG or something.

Come to think of it, I need to get a life; it's 4:00 in the morning!

jdl
 
O.K. , if we're into that, how about renaming it to - "multiple
modulation modes" transponders. And again, would the
relevant protocols support their operation ? And would
the current relevant transmitters and receivers (integrated
into today's computers, for example) be able to pick
them up at the same short ranges ?

Thanks. :smile:

Live long and prosper.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K