# arithmetic progressions

by robin_vanp
Tags: arithmetic, progressions
 P: 4 a question came up "show that the arithmetic progression ax+b contains an infinite subsequence (not necessarily a progression), every two of whose elements are relatively prime." i have a hunch that the chinese remainder theorem has something to do with this, but I'm not sure how. any thoughts?
 P: 461 Is that true? What if a=2, b=o?
 P: 4 sorry, assuming a, b are non zero
P: 461

## arithmetic progressions

Then a=2, b=2 is a counterexample. I think you really need that a and b are coprime, in which case the sequence actually contains infinitely many primes.
 P: 4 right again. its actually a two part question so it says on the top that (a,b) = 1, i forget to mention; if so (now that we finally got the problem) how is the CRT applicable here?
 P: 4 and deriving some sort of solution that does not employ dirichlet's theorem, i think, because then that would be obvious; i really do not know how the CRT can be used here.

 Related Discussions Calculus & Beyond Homework 2 Introductory Physics Homework 1 General Math 3 General Math 2 General Math 3