View Poll Results: Answer to question in OP
Yes 1 7.14%
No 13 92.86%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Closed

Twins or not?

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Nov28-07, 05:23 AM   #1
 

Twins or not?


If two human siblings were born within 365 days of each other then they must be twins (i.e. born on the same date)?

Please explain.
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
biology news on PhysOrg.com

>> Front-row seats to climate change
>> New formula invented for microscope viewing, substitutes for federally controlled drug
>> New discovery of ancient diet shatters conventional ideas of how agriculture emerged
Nov28-07, 05:54 AM   #2
J77
 


I would assume it not possible to get pregnant whilst pregnant...

However, more sprogs are easily conceived after the first one pops out, after 9 months.

Therefore, not twins.

Unless this is a riddle...
 
Nov28-07, 12:07 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
gestation period for humans is ~275-280 days - meaning a mother could have one baby born in January, conceive in February and give birth in November. Two non-twin kids form one mother in less than 365 days - per the wording of your question.

Now if you asked, "can a mother conceive twice and give birth normally twice (to two or more children) in one year" - the answer is no. They would have to be multiple births because 275 * 2 > 365
 
Nov28-07, 12:54 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

Twins or not?


Quote by J77 View Post
However, more sprogs are easily conceived after the first one pops out, after 9 months.
Not all that easily. It takes some time for ovulations to resume after one gives birth, though that time varies among individuals and whether or not one is breast feeding. But, still possible to have a baby born in January and another in December (especially if the second is a bit premature).

I'm also confused by the point of the question. Pivoxa, could you explain the reasining behind your question? Why would you think they're twins? Twins means they are conceived at the same time.
 
Nov28-07, 08:51 PM   #5
 
The question may seem odd. Another way to ask it is:

Is it possible for two sibilings to be born within the same year but are not twins? So one baby at a time in mother's tummy but born within the same year although none born prematurely.
 
Nov28-07, 09:03 PM   #6
 
Admin
Quote by pivoxa15 View Post
Is it possible for two sibilings to be born within the same year but are not twins? So one baby at a time in mother's womb but born within the same year although none born prematurely.
Yes - but it it not common. The first child could be born in Jan, and then the second conceived in late March or early April and then born in Dec. Obvoiusly, as Jim indicated, the first child would be conceived during the previous year. It is not possible to conceive, deliver and then conceive and deliver, in the same year, and not have premature children.

Usually however, a woman who breastfeeds delays subsequent ovulation, while breastfeeding.

I have one brother 14 months younger than me, so my parents go busy soon after I was born.
 
Nov28-07, 09:08 PM   #7
 
Well this is my wife's field of expertise. If you could be more specific I might be able to give you details.
 
Nov28-07, 09:41 PM   #8
 
Quote by Astronuc View Post
Yes - but it it not common. The first child could be born in Jan, and then the second conceived in late March or early April and then born in Dec. Obvoiusly, as Jim indicated, the first child would be conceived during the previous year. It is not possible to conceive, deliver and then conceive and deliver, in the same year, and not have premature children.

Usually however, a woman who breastfeeds delays subsequent ovulation, while breastfeeding.

I have one brother 14 months younger than me, so my parents go busy soon after I was born.
What do you mean by conceived? The important thing is that the siblings are born (out of mother's stomach) in the same year but none born prematurely.
 
Nov29-07, 06:55 AM   #9
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Quote by pivoxa15 View Post
What do you mean by conceived? The important thing is that the siblings are born (out of mother's stomach) in the same year but none born prematurely.
Conception refers to fertilization...the time when intercourse actually occurred that the pregnancy was initiated. And, just for accuracy, since this is a science forum, embryos/fetuses develop within the uterus, not the stomach. If you wish to refer more generally to the area of the body rather than to internal organs, abdomen is an acceptable term.

So, yes, if you are referring to birth only, and not the entire pregnancy, then it is possible for two siblings to be born within the same year, although very uncommon for the reasons already discussed above.
 
Nov29-07, 07:40 AM   #10
J77
 
I must have some unusual friends then -- either that or they like the idea of maternity leave too much after the first has arrived

(My gf is also less than a year older than her younger sister.)
 
Nov29-07, 03:16 PM   #11
 
I raised the question because I know two sibilings in the same year level which dosen't look alike enough to be twins.

So that is a chance that they were born at different times of the year.
 
Nov29-07, 03:24 PM   #12
 
Ah.

Well, just because they're born at the same time doesn't mean they're identical twins. Certainly in this day and age of superovulation technology, it is quite possible that they are due to the simultaneous fertilization of two different ova (as opposed to the splitting of a single ovum after fertilization). That would make them no more twins than any other pair of siblings.

BTW, it is also possible (and has happened) that "twins" do not even share the same father.
 
Nov29-07, 03:41 PM   #13
 
Quote by Moonbear View Post
Conception refers to fertilization...the time when intercourse actually occurred that the pregnancy was initiated. And, just for accuracy, since this is a science forum, embryos/fetuses develop within the uterus, not the stomach. If you wish to refer more generally to the area of the body rather than to internal organs, abdomen is an acceptable term.

So, yes, if you are referring to birth only, and not the entire pregnancy, then it is possible for two siblings to be born within the same year, although very uncommon for the reasons already discussed above.
Offcourse, the stomach is for food processing.:)
 
Nov29-07, 03:45 PM   #14
 
Quote by DaveC426913 View Post
Ah.

Well, just because they're born at the same time doesn't mean they're identical twins. Certainly in this day and age of superovulation technology, it is quite possible that they are due to the simultaneous fertilization of two different ova (as opposed to the splitting of a single ovum after fertilization). That would make them no more twins than any other pair of siblings.

BTW, it is also possible (and has happened) that "twins" do not even share the same father.
Twins without the same father? That must be freaky as in low probability.

The sibilings I had in mind look alike enough to be sisters but not any kind of twin.
 
Nov29-07, 04:39 PM   #15
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by pivoxa15 View Post
Twins without the same father? That must be freaky as in low probability.
It only requires sperm from two separate men to be around two ova at a similar time. The low probability of it happening is largely because most women trying to get pregnant stick with one partner whilst doing it.

The sibilings I had in mind look alike enough to be sisters but not any kind of twin.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but non-identical twins don't typically look any more alike than any other siblings. An ex girlfriend of mine looked little like her (non-identical) twin sister, and my current girlfriend's twin is a boy...
 
Nov29-07, 05:05 PM   #16
 
Most fraternal (not sure if thats spelled right) twins do look similar. Mary-Kate and Ashly Olsen aren't identical twins, and they look it. (I didnt really want to use them as an example, but they are widely know).

But that can seriously happen?? Twins from different fathers!?!
 
Nov29-07, 06:19 PM   #17
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by pivoxa15 View Post
I raised the question because I know two sibilings in the same year level which dosen't look alike enough to be twins.

So that is a chance that they were born at different times of the year.
But they may simply be heterozygote twins! (i.e. two different embryos were fertilized at the same time). So they are born at the sam etime but don't have the same genetics. two heterozygote twins may even be of different sex!
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Twins or not?
Thread Forum Replies
ok so u have two twins, both have clocks set to zero. Special & General Relativity 5
Twins Brain Teasers 5
Twins have same DNA? Biology 4
What do you know about twins? Biology 14
if identical twins have the same genes Biology 17