| Thread Closed |
Doubly Indexed Array |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Dec3-07, 02:54 PM | #1 |
|
|
Doubly Indexed Array
HELLO. GOT A QUICK QUESTION:
FROM THE TEXT: [tex]|S_{mn} - S| <\ \in\ for\ all\ m,n \ge N.[/tex] [tex]For\ the\ moment,\ consider\ m\ \in\ N\ to\ be\ fixed\ and\ write\ S_{mn}\ as:[/tex] [tex]S_{mn}\ =\ \sum^{n}_{j=1}a_{1j}\ +\ \sum^{n}_{j=1}a_{2j}\ +\ ...\ +\ \sum^{n}_{j=1}a_{mj}[/tex] [tex]Our\ hypothesis\ guarantees\ that\ for\ each\ fixed\ row,\ i,\ the\ series\ \sum^{\infty}_{j=1}\ converges\ absoloutely\ to\ some\ real\ number,\ r_i.[/tex] HERES WHAT I HAVE TO DO: [tex]Exercise\ 2.8.5.\ (a)\ Use\ the\ Algebraic\ Limit\ Theorem\ and\ the\ Order\ limit\ theorem\ to\ show\ that\ for\ all\ m\ge N\ |(r_{1},\ +\ r_{2},\ +\ ...\ +\ r_{m})\ -\ S| \le \in[/tex] [tex]Conclude\ that\ the\ iterated\ sum\ \sum^{\infty}_{i=1}\sum^{\infty}_{j=1}\ converges\ to\ S[/tex] Obviously the larger of an m you take r_m to means the closer you'll get to S, and since m belongs to N then the largest it can go is infinity, which would mean the double sum would indeed converge to S. Is that "enough" of a conclusion? |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Doubly Indexed Array
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| converting from an array of function values to coordinate array of different length | Programming & Comp Sci | 3 | ||
| Indexed Families of Sets | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 7 | ||
| Problem with null indexed family of subsets. | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 13 | ||
| Def.: Continuously Indexed Vector Basis? | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 6 | ||
| Doubly Special Relativity | General Physics | 5 | ||