smallest unit of time


by Mephisto
Tags: smallest, time, unit
Mephisto
Mephisto is offline
#1
Jan13-08, 10:58 PM
P: 93
i read somewhere that the smallest unit of time that makes sense is the Planck time, ~10^-43 seconds. I'd like to know how physicists arrived at this number. Also, why is it so impossible to think of a time step lower than that? What equation exactly is in conflict, and what kind of a conflict is it? For example, do you get a division by 0 if you try to use a lower time, somehow? or what happens?

thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists consider implications of recent revelations about the universe's first light
Vacuum ultraviolet lamp of the future created in Japan
Grasp of SQUIDs dynamics facilitates eavesdropping
nicksauce
nicksauce is offline
#2
Jan13-08, 11:01 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
nicksauce's Avatar
P: 1,276
From wikipedia:
"The following thought experiment illuminates this fact. The task is to measure an object's position by bouncing electromagnetic radiation, namely photons, off it. The shorter the wavelength of the photons, and hence the higher their energy, the more accurate the measurement. If the photons are sufficiently energetic to make possible a measurement more precise than a Planck length, their collision with the object would, in principle, create a minuscule black hole. This black hole would "swallow" the photon and thereby make it impossible to obtain a measurement. A simple calculation using dimensional analysis suggests that this problem arises if we attempt to measure an object's position with a precision to within a Planck length."

The Planck time is the time it takes for a particle traveling at c to cross the Planck length.

Also, dimensional analysis shows that the Planck length is the only length that can be obtained from some mix of the 3 important physical constants G, h, c (up to a scale factor), so this shows that it might (must?) have some physical importance. If space and time are discrete it would seem that the Planck length and time would be the natural units for discreteness.
pam
pam is offline
#3
Jan14-08, 07:34 AM
P: 455
Quote Quote by Mephisto View Post
i read somewhere that the smallest unit of time that makes sense is the Planck time, ~10^-43 seconds. I'd like to know how physicists arrived at this number. Also, why is it so impossible to think of a time step lower than that? What equation exactly is in conflict, and what kind of a conflict is it? For example, do you get a division by 0 if you try to use a lower time, somehow? or what happens?

thanks
The "Planck time" is just a convenient unit of time for some applications.
It is not a "smallest unit of time" and there is no reason that shorter time intervals
don't exist.

lazypast
lazypast is offline
#4
Jan14-08, 11:57 AM
P: 81

smallest unit of time


that text from wikipedia is so clear. i always thought plank time was the time at which after the big bang no one can describe.

like from t=0s to t=1^-43s physics breaksdown and doesnt describe this period

is this all wrong in which case ive plucked from absolute nothing??
yogi3939
yogi3939 is offline
#5
Jan14-08, 12:19 PM
P: 11
To my knowledge there is no "shortest unit of time". There is only an inability to measure time to determine if one actually exists. So far conventional thinking is divided between the uniform flow camp and the discrete unit camp and no one has devised a way to prove or disprove either one.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Unit-Pulse Response for Discrete Time System Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 4
[Signals & Systems] Continuous-Time Unit Step Electrical Engineering 8
universal unit of time Quantum Physics 5
Smallest cycle time for electronics Electrical Engineering 6
The time space unit structure General Physics 1