| Thread Closed |
Progress in Afghanistan |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Oct12-08, 05:38 PM | #52 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Progress in Afghanistan
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200806/world-in-numbers
|
| Oct12-08, 08:11 PM | #53 |
|
Admin
|
A good program that was going on was the Alternative Livelihoods Program / Eradicating Drugs by USAid/Dept of State.
http://www.state.gov/p/sca/rls/fs/2005/52396.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badakhshan_Province |
| Oct12-08, 08:36 PM | #54 |
|
|
The best summary of the current status in Afghanistan was in a BBC report I read the other day where the reporter said the total extent of the Afghan gov'ts influence is the distance of one rifle shot from the fortified walls of Kabul.
|
| Oct13-08, 08:33 AM | #55 |
|
Admin
|
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/refere...nan/index.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/13/wo.../13afghan.html Perhaps. I think the US can win all the battles, but unless there is a stable and non-corrupt government to lead the country, it would seem the victory(ies) would be in vain. My greatest concern and objection is the killing of non-combatants - women and children. I don't expect the Taliban to be concerned about that, but I do think that US and NATO forces should go the extra step not to kill civilians - that means no firing into villages or compounds unless one is sure that no women and children are present. |
| Oct13-08, 08:36 AM | #56 |
|
Mentor
Blog Entries: 4
|
|
| Oct13-08, 08:29 PM | #58 |
|
Blog Entries: 14
|
I think US cannot eliminate the Afghanistan people who don't like US. |
| Oct15-08, 01:25 PM | #59 |
|
Admin
|
If one calls in an AC-130, one is going to kill civilians. The US and NATO forces need to be smarter. Meanwhile Pakistan and Afghanistan go hand in hand because the Pahstuns (e.g. Waziri) straddle the border. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pashtun Intelligence report: U.S. antiterror ally Pakistan 'on the edge' http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20...latchy/3072503 |
| Oct17-08, 07:10 AM | #60 |
|
Admin
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081017/...as_afghanistan
Official: Afghans probing 17 civilian deaths The hijackers who attacked the WTC and Pentagon on Sept 11, were from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (now headquarters for Halliburton), Egypt and Lebanon. Osama bin Laden (al Qaida) is from Saudi Arabia and Ayman al-Zawahiri is Egyptian. One connection with Pakistan would be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who was born in Kuwait to parents from Baluchistan (Pakistan). |
| Oct17-08, 07:25 AM | #61 |
|
|
At this point I have absolutely no clue what the mission is in Afghanistan.
What are the US and other NATO forces trying to achieve? If their role is to provide security and stability then they are failing miserably and indeed are the main causes of the lack of security and instability. By supporting what were the murdering war lords of the former Northern Alliance they have helped drug dealing, corrupt criminals to take power and are expending huge resources in men and material to keep them there at a cost of alienating an entire generation of people. Why??? |
| Oct17-08, 09:55 AM | #62 |
|
|
That's going back to the old cop out where terrorists can attack as they please because as long as the government of whatever country they reside in didn't actually make the attack, therefore the US can't respond. That's just not always realistic and Afghanistan is one of those instances. I don't think that necessarily means we shoud leave. The US still hasn't accomplished what it set out to do. Doing that raises the possibility of an even bigger mess. US and Pakistani forces have had minor skirmishes with each other over the last month. I think the skirmishes will continue for a while and could get worse. That raises an interesting possibility. We could have combat, complete with casualties, with another nuclear armed country. That would be a new world first. We could also have combat where both the US and the enemy forces were being funded by the US taxpayer. Then again, most of the US aid goes to beefing up Pakistan's forces along their border with India rather than to their forces along the Afghanistan border, so maybe we're not funding enemy forces so much. I'm not sure how the US should have handled Pakistan immediately after the Afghanistan invasion, but the way we did handle them hasn't worked. |
| Oct17-08, 10:15 AM | #63 |
|
Admin
|
Al Qaida and their Taliban sympathizers who are planning attacks against US, Pakistan and Afghan governments and innocent people are legitimate targets (at least according to internationals standards). If one reads the reports from Robert Fisk (The Independent, UK), he mentions the situation with the people in the border region whose villages were bombed or shelled by US forces. Most are not Taliban, but some members in the villages may be Taliban. Non-combatants, including women and children, are killed. I have a big problem with that! The first interaction some of these people have with the outside world is American/NATO military attacking their villages. Paraphrasing an old proverb - One evil deed (or misdeed) undermines 1000 good deeds. I think there is a better way, and I'm working on it.
|
| Oct19-08, 03:03 PM | #64 |
|
Admin
|
Pakistan and Afghanistan go hand in hand. Both countries share tribes and a common history.
Pakistan is in deep trouble economically. Pakistan reported nearing default, to seek IMF help |
| Oct21-08, 04:46 PM | #65 |
|
Admin
|
Afghan journalism student sentenced to 20 years
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081021/...urnalist_trial The apparent goal in Afghanistan is to preclude a haven for al Qaida. Aside from that, the Bush administration seems less concerned about democracy. |
| Nov6-08, 09:36 AM | #66 |
|
|
Yet more civilians killed by 'accident'
Given the lack of impact of numerous previous condemnations of attacks leading to civilian deaths it seems until a military commander is actually held responsible for one of these atrocities it is likely they will continue unabated. Even if the military top brass care nothing for civilian casualties they must realise these reckless attacks are the perfect recruiting sergeant for anti-western forces. |
| Nov12-08, 02:15 PM | #67 |
|
|
These attacks on women/girls, which happen in similar fashion elsewhere as well, I never understand. It only proves how weak those guys are where they become concerned about females actually accomplishing something with their lives. Geez, talk about insecurities! |
| Nov28-08, 06:50 AM | #68 |
|
|
A good article from the Independent drawing parallels between the situation in Afghanistan today and the past.
snip |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Progress in Afghanistan
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| UAE troops in afghanistan | Current Events | 1 | ||
| Afghanistan - a state of contradiction? | Current Events | 11 | ||
| Lasers used in Iraq and Afghanistan | Computing & Technology | 3 | ||
| Advancing women's rights in Afghanistan | Current Events | 4 | ||
| Election in Afghanistan | Current Events | 1 | ||