Solving a Spinning Disk Physics Exam Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a spinning solid disk that transitions from sliding to rolling without slipping on a level surface. The original poster is tasked with showing the relationship between the initial and final angular velocities of the disk.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation of angular momentum but questions the correctness of their calculations and signs. Some participants suggest potential misapplications of the moment of inertia and raise questions about the conservation of energy and momentum due to friction. Others explore the implications of static versus kinetic friction in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on the problem. Some have provided alternative approaches and insights, while others are still questioning the assumptions made regarding friction and the moment of inertia. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the dialogue appears to be productive.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion regarding the type of moment of inertia used and the role of friction in the problem. The original poster's calculations may have been influenced by incorrect assumptions about the system's dynamics.

discoverer02
Messages
138
Reaction score
1
Here's the problem and I'm close to the answer, but I guess close isn't good enough on a Physics exam.

A spinning solid disk, rotating with angular velocity Wo, is put down on a level surface. It slides and rolls until it reaches an angular velocity W at which it rolls without sliding. Show that W = Wo/3

I place my origin on the ground so that angular momentum is conserved.

The disk spins clockwise
1 = right when the disk is placed on the floor.
2 = right when the disk begins rolling without spinning.
L = angular momentum.
cm = center of mass.
I = moment of inertia about cm
R = radius
M = Mass
V = Velocity of cm

L1spin + L1cm = L2spin + L2cm

IWo + 0 = IW - RMV ==> with no slip V = RW
(2/5)MWoR^2 = (2/5)MWR^2 - MWR^2
-2Wo/3 = W

Besides probably messing up the signs, why do I end up with twice what I need?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmmm...

I've never done anything like this one & I don't have an answer, but I have some questions that may help...

It looks like you're using the moment of inertia for a solid sphere rather than a cylinder. Is that part of the problem?

Clearly friction is involved here, otherwise the disk would just keep spinning. Doesn't that mean that neither energy nor momentum are conserved?

Can this be solved without knowing μs? Can it be that regardless of what the initial angular velocity is, it will always scrub off exactly 2/3 of its speed before it stops slipping, independent of the coefficient of static friction? That's certainly counter-intuitive.

On the other hand, maybe it's μk that's relevant, since the disk is sliding initially. But once it stops slipping, static friction must take over, right?
 
Last edited:
This is amazing!

Let
Δt = time elapsed until disk stops slipping
f = force of friction while slipping (assumed this to be constant)

Then the linear momentum gained by the disk is equal to the impulse provided by the friction so
fΔt = Mvcm ....Equation 1

and the change in angular momentum is equal to the angular impulse which (I hope :smile: ) is given by
TΔt = Iω0 - Iω

and T = fR so
fRΔt = (1/2)MR2(ω0 - ω)
fΔt = (1/2)MR(ω0 - ω)

Now, substuting from Equation 1:
Mvcm = (1/2)MR(ω0 - ω)
vcm = (1/2)R(ω0 - ω)

and vcm = Rω so
Rω = (1/2)R(ω0 - ω)
ω = (1/2)ω0 - (1/2)ω
(1/2)ω0 = (3/2)ω
ω0 = 3ω

Whoda thunk that?

...

By the way, go to the Mathematics forum and see Greg Bernhardt's announcement about Making math symbols and the thread Additional math notation for tips on formatting.
 
Last edited:
You're right. I was taking the moment of inertial of a sphere rather than a disk and I also messed up this signs in the equation.

Yours is a very interesting approach. I'm impressed. I tend to stay within the mechanics of what was presented in class and not think about the problem enough. It obviously pays to think about the problem.

Thanks very much for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K