Help Solve Integration Theory Assignment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the claim that if a function f is continuous on R and the integral of |f| equals 0, then f must equal 0. The argument by contradiction is established by assuming f is not equal to 0 at some point, which implies it is non-zero in a surrounding interval due to continuity. This leads to the conclusion that the integral of |f| over that interval must be greater than 0, contradicting the initial premise that the integral equals 0. Therefore, it is definitively concluded that f must be equal to 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuity in real analysis
  • Familiarity with Riemann integrals
  • Knowledge of contradiction arguments in mathematical proofs
  • Basic concepts of limits and intervals in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of continuous functions on R
  • Learn about Riemann sums and their relation to integration
  • Explore more examples of proof by contradiction in analysis
  • Investigate the implications of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students studying real analysis, particularly those working on integration theory assignments, as well as educators looking for clear examples of continuity and integration concepts.

mooberrymarz
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Guyz please help me !

hey! Could any of u please help me with this question. Its for my general integration theory assigment.

'Use an argumetn by contradiction to establish the following claim:
If f is continuous on R and [tex]\int |f|= 0,then f = 0.[\tex]<br /> <br /> thanx[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rough argument. If f is not 0 at some point, it must be not 0 in an interval around that point (continuity). Therefore the integral of |f| will be >0.
 
!

Sure, I'd be happy to help! To begin, let's first define what it means for a function to be continuous on R. A function f is continuous on R if it is continuous at every point in the set of real numbers, R. This means that the limit of f(x) as x approaches any real number a, is equal to f(a).

Now, let's assume that the claim is false. This means that there exists a function f that is continuous on R and has an integral of 0, but f is not equal to 0. In other words, there exists at least one point a in R where f(a) is not equal to 0.

Since f is continuous on R, this means that it is also continuous at a. Therefore, we can use the definition of continuity to say that the limit of f(x) as x approaches a is equal to f(a).

Now, since f(a) is not equal to 0, this means that there exists a small interval around a where f(x) is also not equal to 0. Let's call this interval (a - δ, a + δ), where δ is a positive number.

Next, we can use the definition of the integral to say that the integral of f over this interval is equal to the limit of the Riemann sum as the partition size approaches 0. Since f is not equal to 0 on this interval, this means that the Riemann sum will also not approach 0.

Therefore, we can conclude that the integral of f over this interval is not equal to 0. But this contradicts our initial assumption that the integral of f over R is equal to 0.

Thus, our assumption that f is not equal to 0 must be false. In other words, f must be equal to 0 for the claim to hold true.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions. Good luck with your assignment!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K