| Thread Closed |
winding number questions |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar24-08, 09:58 AM | #1 |
|
|
winding number questions
I have some questions about this proof. I have numbered the equations (1), (2), ... so I can ask about them.
THEOREM If the piecewise differentiable closed curve [tex]\gamma[/tex] does not pass through the point a then: [tex](1) \displaystyle\oint_{\gamma}\frac{dz}{z-a}[/tex] is s multiple of [tex]2 \pi i[/tex] PROOF [tex]\gamma[/tex] is given by z(t) [tex]\alpha \leq t \leq \beta[/tex] consider: [tex](2) h(t)=\displaystyle\int^{t}_{\aplha}\frac{z'(t)}{z(t)-a}dt[/tex] h(t) is defined and continuos on the closed interval [tex](\alpha, \beta)[/tex] [tex](3) h'(t)=\frac{z'(t)}{z(t)-a}[/tex] where z'(t) is continuos. [tex](4) k=e^{-h(t)}(z(t)-a)[/tex] (5) Hence k' = 0. [tex](6) e^{h(t)}=\frac{(z(t)-a)}{k}[/tex] [tex](7) e^{h(t)}=\frac{(z(t)-a)}{z(\alpha)-a}[/tex] Since [tex]\gamma[/tex] is a closed curve [tex]z(\beta)=z(\alpha)[/tex] [tex](8) e^{h(\beta)}=1[/tex] [tex]h(\beta)[/tex] must be a multiple of [tex]2 \pi i[/tex]. END QUESTIONS 1. (3) why do we need to know about h'(t)? 2. (5) why is k' = 0? 3. How did we replace k with [tex]z(\alpha)-a[/tex] in step (7) ? Thanks for any help you can give. I need to understand this proof for a test and I'd rather not memorize these bits, but instead know what I'm doing! Thanks! |
| Mar24-08, 10:46 AM | #2 |
|
|
You need to know [itex] h^\prime (t) [/itex] in order to answer question 2. For question 2, calculate [itex] \frac{dk}{dt}[/itex]. You should get
[tex] \frac{dk}{dt} = -h^\prime (t) e^{-h(t) } (z(t) -a ) + e^{-h (t)} z^\prime (t) [/tex] And substitute what you're given for [itex] h^\prime (t) [/itex]. |
| Mar24-08, 10:48 AM | #3 |
|
|
Thanks! I think I get it now!
|
| Mar24-08, 10:52 AM | #4 |
|
|
winding number questions
I'm not 100% about part 3, but I think it's because [itex] \frac{dk}{dt}=0 [/itex]. Thus we know that k must be a constant. Since k is a constant, if we know it's value at one place, we know it at any other. Thus [itex] k \equiv k(\alpha) = e^{-h(\alpha)} ( z(\alpha) - a) [/itex] but then there's an extra [itex] e^{-h(\alpha)} [/itex] and I'm not sure where it disappears.
|
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: winding number questions
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Strings Chan-Paton U(N) gauge symmetry fractional winding number... | Beyond the Standard Model | 0 | ||
| Number theory questions | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 8 | ||
| Number theory questions | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 9 | ||
| Questions on number theory.. | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 2 | ||
| Questions in number theory... | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 3 | ||