Flattening Equation: Solve for Equatorial Radius a

  • Thread starter stevebd1
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses two equations related to the flattening ratio of a rapidly spinning neutron star. One equation is relevant to rotation and density, while the other is relevant to the relationship between the two radii. The conversation also mentions a method for simplifying the calculation of the equatorial radius by combining the two equations, but this may not lead to a simple solution. The conversation suggests using Cardano's cubic formula for finding the equatorial radius, but it is not a straightforward process.
  • #1
stevebd1
Insights Author
Gold Member
750
41
The equation is rooted in astrophysics but the question is related to the mathematical modification of two equations.

Basically the following are two equations which provide the flattening ratio for a rapidly spinning neutron star-

[tex] \frac{3\pi}{2GT^{2}\rho} = \textit{f} = 1-\frac{b}{a} [/tex]

G- gravitational constant, T- rotation period (in seconds) and [tex]\rho[/tex] is density, [tex]\textit{f}[/tex]- flattening ratio, a- long radius (equatorial), b- short radius (polar)

The LHS equation is relevant to rotation and density (which is relevant to length a, the equatorial radius and length b, the polar radius). The RHS equation is relevant to the relationship between the 2 radii, a and b. I haven't find a method which simply produces an answer for the equatorial radius a, instead it's a process of trial and error using both equations until they agree on an answer. In an attempt to create just one equation, I substituted the formulas for time and density and based on the apparent fact that during flattening, the volume of the neutron star changes but the actual cross sectional area of a compact star ~ stays the same, b = [tex]R^{2}[/tex]/a, which produces the equation below-

[tex]\frac{3.125 R^{2}\alpha^{2}Gm}{a^{3}c^{2}}+\frac{R^{2}}{a^{2}}=1[/tex]

R- radius of neutron star at rest, [tex]\alpha[/tex]- spin parameter (0 -1), G- gravitational constant, m- mass, a- long radius (equatorial), c- speed of light

which working out the constants provides-

[tex]\frac{2.32e10^{-27}R^{2}\alpha^{2}m}{a^{3}}+\frac{R^{2}}{a^{2}}=1[/tex]

which makes the trial and error process for calculating a (equatorial radius) much quicker. My question is, how do I combine the two separate fractions into one (removing the plus sign) and if possible, how do I move 'a' over to one side of the equation in order to simply calculate the equatorial radius. Any feedback is welcome.

Steve



Equations-

[tex]T=\frac{1}{f_{Hz}}[/tex]

T- rotation period (in seconds), [tex]f_{Hz}[/tex]- frequency (in Hz)

where

[tex]f_{Hz}=\frac{v}{2\pi a}[/tex]

v- rotational velocity at equator edge, a- long radius (equatorial)

[tex]v=\frac{J}{ma(2/5)}[/tex]

J- angular momentum, m- mass, a- long radius (equatorial)

[tex]J=\frac{\alpha Gm^{2}}{c}[/tex]

J- angular momentum, [tex]\alpha[/tex]- spin parameter (0 - 1), G- gravitational radius, m- mass, c- speed of light

and

[tex]\rho=\frac{m}{V}[/tex]

m- mass, V- volume

where

[tex]V=\frac{4}{3}\pi a^{2}b[/tex]

a- long radius (equatorial), b- short radius (polar)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ignoring all but the parts relevant to your specific question, you have
[tex]\frac{A}{a^3}+ \frac{B}{a^2}= 1[/tex]

Multiplying both sides of the equation by a3 gives A+ Ba= a3 or
a3- Ba- A= 0.

There isn't going to be any simple solution. You can try using Cardano's cubic formula:

http://www.math.vanderbilt.edu/~schectex/courses/cubic/

but it isn't going to be nice!
 

1. What is the "Flattening Equation"?

The Flattening Equation is a mathematical formula used to calculate the difference between the equatorial radius and the polar radius of an ellipsoid, which is a three-dimensional shape resembling a flattened sphere.

2. Why is it important to solve for Equatorial Radius a?

Solving for Equatorial Radius a allows us to accurately measure the size and shape of the Earth and other celestial bodies. It is also useful for various engineering and geodetic applications, such as mapping and navigation.

3. How is the Flattening Equation derived?

The Flattening Equation is derived from the ratio of the equatorial and polar radii of an ellipsoid. It is based on the assumption that the Earth is an oblate spheroid, meaning it is flattened at the poles and bulging at the equator.

4. What units are used in the Flattening Equation?

The Flattening Equation is typically expressed in terms of meters (m) or kilometers (km) for the radii and is a unitless value for the flattening ratio. However, other units of measurement can also be used as long as they are consistent.

5. How is the Flattening Equation used in real-world applications?

The Flattening Equation is used in a variety of fields, including cartography, geodesy, geophysics, and astronomy. It is used to create more accurate maps and navigation systems, measure the Earth's gravitational field, and understand the shape and composition of other planets and celestial bodies.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
739
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
63
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
729
Replies
1
Views
699
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
395
Replies
13
Views
890
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
370
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top