New Computer Case Design - Airflow Dynamics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around designing a homemade computer case with a focus on airflow dynamics and sound reduction. Participants explore various aspects of airflow, sound absorption materials, and the arrangement of components within the case, considering both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a chimney-style design for the case to manage heat and sound, questioning whether each tier should have the same volume and expressing concern about air speed and pressure buildup when transitioning between different volumes.
  • Another participant suggests that as long as air pathways are not excessively small, airflow should not be significantly hindered, while also discussing methods to reduce sound energy through various materials.
  • A different participant emphasizes the importance of vertical orientation for components like the motherboard to maintain effective airflow.
  • One contributor confirms that halving the area of airflow will double the velocity and increase pressure, referencing examples from commercial designs that utilize large heatsinks and minimal fan use for quiet operation.
  • Another participant raises a caution about sound absorption materials, noting that they can convert acoustic energy into heat and may restrict airflow, potentially impacting cooling efficiency.
  • A participant mentions that many sound issues may stem from fan bearings and recommends specific brands of quiet fans as a solution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of sound absorption materials and the optimal arrangement of components for airflow. There is no clear consensus on the best design practices or the impact of various factors on airflow and sound reduction.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss assumptions regarding airflow dynamics, sound absorption, and the physical arrangement of components, but these assumptions are not universally agreed upon and may depend on specific design choices.

cerestes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Building a homemade computer case, designed mainly for silence.
General theory is computers generate heat, fighting heat (fans) make noise.

Heat moves, up, don't fight it. Case will be designed in a chimney fashion. Using many levels will force the sound to bounce back and forth (off of walls lined with sound deadening material), and hopefully not hinder air flow too much.

Question is, from an airflow perspective, should each tier have the same volume? What I'm worried about is if you go from a tier with a large volume to a smaller tier, does the air simply speed up?

I would expect if you halved the volume, their air speed would double. However, I'm concerned about creating a pressure buildup trying to force the air through the smaller tier which would decrease effeciency.


Code:
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^|   <-- exhaust air filter, grill
|     DVDROM     |   <-- 5.25" bay
|  ____________  |
|   CPU  [ [ [   |   <-- upside-down motherboard
|   | |  [ [ [   |
|___| |__||______|   <-- two exhaust ducts
|                |
|_____________   |
|                |
|     HD         |
|_PSU____________|   <-- PSU and 120mm fan push air
|                |
|_____________   |
|                |
|                |
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^|   <-- intake air filter
 V              V    <-- legs to raise above floor

Any input from someone real familar with how air flows?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My fluid dynamics is too rusty, I'll let someone else tackle that. I'd say as long as you don't get too small with your air pathways, not much to worry about there.

The two main types of sound reduction are to absorb the sound energy (foam, fiberglass insulation, jute carpet padding, etc) and to minimize structure borne noise. The structure borne noise that is a result of the actual mechanical panels acting as 'speakers' creating the noise in the interior compartment can have the noise level reduced with viscoelastic asphalt based materials and decoupling materials. Works fine in cars and planes but that wouldn't help much in a computer case.

You need quiet fans (places like Grainger sometimes list fans with db rating) and then need to try to place absorbing material effectively to minimize direct sound (and reflect it back in) and this is a simple 90 degree or 180 bend with an absorber placed for the sound to 'run into' at the end of the turn. Here's a picture about 1/3 the way down this page that shows how to create a box to quiet down a HVAC register, and that's a fan blowing air in a manner similar to yours...
http://www.acoustics101.com/components_gateway.htm

Cliff
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its a little tough to tell from the pic, but are you showing everything horizontal? Motherboard, drives, etc? That'll completely destroy your airflow. The motherboard especially, must be vertical and there must be at least a small unobstructed vertical air path.
 
Neoprene washers on the screws between the fans and metal.

Yes, cutting the area in half doubles the velocity of the air and will increase the pressure some.

Some company (Dell I think?) just used a huge heatsink on their CPU and the PSU fan for their PIII cooling. Very quiet. Ran the heatsink to infront of the PSU fan intake. And I think Apple had a fairly recent model with no fan.
 
Think about conservation of energy before you put sound absorption inside your case. What happens to that accoustic energy when it is absorbed? It is converted to heat. Also, probably more importantly, most sound absorbers act like thermal insulation. They restrict airflow, and prevent convection processes from moving heat to the case's metal exterior.

Njorl
 
Some of the the Dell cases are quite silent. I think most of the sound comes from bad bearings in the fans. Papst (or Pabst, can't remember exactly) makes great fans. Perhaps a little pricey, but they're really nice ! Worth looking into, I think.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K