Subquantum Field Theory & Field Model of Electron

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of Subquantum Field Theory and its implications for understanding the interaction between particles and fields. It emphasizes the use of Faraday-Maxwell fields and the Maxwell-Lorentz equations, which are satisfied through the introduction of new subquantum fundamental field sources. Participants highlight the necessity of higher dimensionality for a strict definition of these sources and discuss the challenges faced by physicists in comprehending the essence of time and space in relation to particle interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Faraday-Maxwell fields
  • Familiarity with Maxwell-Lorentz equations
  • Knowledge of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Concepts of higher dimensionality in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of higher dimensionality in Subquantum Field Theory
  • Explore the relationship between Maxwell-Lorentz equations and particle interactions
  • Investigate the role of virtual vacuum currents in Quantum Electrodynamics
  • Study the polytronic model and its applications in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of particle-field interactions and Subquantum Field Theory.

Gobols
Hello!

Judge yourself. The unified field is a Faraday–Maxwell field. Maxwell–Lorentz equations (ML-equations) for potentials in standard four-dimensional form are satisfied precisely. This is achieved by involving new subquantum fundamental field sources, strict definition of which requires higher dimensionality. Subquantum charged currents in the right side of ML-equation correspond to virtual vacuum currents QED but are determined independently...

All particles and fields – they are just visible exhibitions of interaction between the field and its sources!

http://www.ltn.lv/~elefzaze/

Göttingen's Tragedy as Choice of History

Born did not manage to find something more convincing then an atomistic instinct of so wide a range of experimenters, the instinct guarding the immunity of static pattern of electron and rejecting strongly a certain liquid of Levi-Civita (and Minkowski)...

http://www.ltn.lv/~elefzaze/?mj=0602

Alexander.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Alexander!
I had read the first eight articles of yours paradigm.
I think, that the theme of interaction of particles and fields for a long time turned into a headache for physicists. I actively was engaged for this theme per 70-s' and 80-s' years and had come to the conclusion, that without understanding of an essence of time and space, zero and perpetuity the theorists are hardly reached of successes.
Now I am engaged in the practical tasks. I try to understand structure of space in atoms and particles with the help of my polytronic model. The polytron is a ring of linear energy, which can vibrate with strictly installed frequencies.
Your current lines is practically the same.
I think, that our ideas are rather close.
Please, look at one my small calculation and express your opinion.
Vladimir
http://www.sibnet.ru/~polytron/em_interaction.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K