If a mass became pulled up from Earth, its U increases and its K

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ignition
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Mass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of gravitational potential energy (U) and kinetic energy (K) as a mass is moved away from Earth. Participants explore the implications of gravitational energy in large-scale contexts and whether gravity can be considered a conservative field.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that as a mass is pulled up from Earth, its potential energy increases while its kinetic energy decreases, leading to the idea that gravity might not be a conservative field on a large scale.
  • Others argue that the reference point for potential energy is crucial, noting that potential energy is defined as zero at infinity, which suggests that it starts negative and increases to zero as the mass moves away from Earth.
  • A participant challenges the notion that potential energy becomes zero in space, emphasizing that it remains negative but approaches zero as the distance from Earth increases.
  • There is a discussion about the role of external forces and kinetic energy, with some suggesting that total energy can remain constant even if kinetic energy decreases while potential energy increases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether gravity is a conservative field and how potential energy behaves at large distances. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of potential energy on the chosen reference point and the implications of external forces on energy conservation, but these aspects remain complex and not fully resolved.

Ignition
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
If a mass became pulled up from Earth, its U increases and its K decreases, but if it became pulled into space, its U becames 0. So, could we say that Gravity is not a conservative field in large scale, but a negative Energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignition said:
If a mass became pulled up from Earth, its U increases and its K decreases, but if it became pulled into space, its U becames 0.
Realize, since we take U = 0 at infinity as the reference point, that the U of the system starts out negative and increases to zero.
So, could we say that Gravity is not a conservative field in large scale, but a negative Energy?
Not sure why you'd conclude that gravity is not conservative at large scale. Realize that the sign of potential energy depends on your reference point.
 
Ignition said:
If a mass became pulled up from Earth, its U increases and its K decreases
Well, no. If it is pulled into space, then there is a force acting on it which would increase its total energy. It might well keep the same K (Kinetic energy) while increasing its potential energy. If it already has a large kinetic energy on Earth and uses only that energy to move away from the earth, with no external force, then the kinetic energy decreases while the potential energy increases so the total energy remains the same.

, but if it became pulled into space, its U becames 0.So, could we say that Gravity is not a conservative field in large scale, but a negative Energy?
Again, no. Its potential energy does NOT become 0 "in space". For gravitational problems, potential energy (which, as Doc Al said, is always relative to some reference point) is taken to be 0 at infinity, not just in space. If you take an object to have a very large negative potential energy on Earth (and considering only the Earth's gravity) the at several light years from the Earth it would have a very small, but still non-zero negative, potential energy.
 
Ok, great, you are very good.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K