tension and frequency


by warmfire540
Tags: frequency, tension
warmfire540
warmfire540 is offline
#1
Jun14-08, 10:42 PM
P: 55
The G string of a guitar which should be 392 Hz is playing flat at 380 Hz. What percentage change in the tension of the wire is required so as to tune the string to 392 Hz?

I just need to help getting started on this one, I don't know how to relate tension to frequency without knowing lamda
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction
Cyber risks can cause disruption on scale of 2008 crisis, study says
Mantis shrimp stronger than airplanes
dynamicsolo
dynamicsolo is offline
#2
Jun14-08, 11:19 PM
HW Helper
P: 1,664
The velocity of the waves on the string will be the product of the frequency and wavelength. Changing the tension in the string alters the velocity of the waves, but since the fundamental tone of the string is produced by a standing wave, that wavelength is constant. So you will not need to know it (or the length of the string itself).
warmfire540
warmfire540 is offline
#3
Jun15-08, 09:41 PM
P: 55
Quote Quote by dynamicsolo View Post
The velocity of the waves on the string will be the product of the frequency and wavelength. Changing the tension in the string alters the velocity of the waves, but since the fundamental tone of the string is produced by a standing wave, that wavelength is constant. So you will not need to know it (or the length of the string itself).

Okay, well where would I derive a formula to find the tension, or therefore the change of tension in this case?

Hurkyl
Hurkyl is offline
#4
Jun15-08, 09:46 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Hurkyl's Avatar
P: 16,101

tension and frequency


Quote Quote by warmfire540 View Post
I just need to help getting started on this one, I don't know how to relate tension to frequency without knowing lamda
You don't have to know lambda in order to manipulate it algebraically.
warmfire540
warmfire540 is offline
#5
Jun15-08, 10:54 PM
P: 55
Quote Quote by Hurkyl View Post
You don't have to know lambda in order to manipulate it algebraically.
How come? I don't get why we don't need lambda? What other equation is there? How do you do it "algebraically?"
dynamicsolo
dynamicsolo is offline
#6
Jun15-08, 11:53 PM
HW Helper
P: 1,664
You have the wave relation

v = f lam.

For the untuned string, then, you have

v_1 = f_1 lam_1

and, for the properly tuned string,

v_2 = f_2 lam_2 .

But the length of the G string doesn't change, so neither does the fundamental standing wavelength at which it vibrates. So we have

lam_1 = lam_2 = lam .

If we now compare the wave velocities, we get

v_2/v_1 = (f_2 lam)/(f_1 lam) = f_2/f_1 .

So we don't need to know the length of the string or the fundamental standing wavelength.

You know the relationship between wave velocity, string tension, and string linear mass density, so you can work out the ratio of the tuned versus untuned string tension. (BTW, you don't need to know the linear mass density of the string either: that also will cancel out.)

From the ratio of the tensions, you can find the fractional tension change, and from that, the percentage of tension change in the string.
warmfire540
warmfire540 is offline
#7
Jun18-08, 11:56 AM
P: 55
Okay

Well from here i see that f2/f1 = 392/380 = 1.0316
So the tuned string's tension is 1.0316 times more than the untuned strings tension.

This is also seen as a 96.94%, or a 3.06% in tension.
dynamicsolo
dynamicsolo is offline
#8
Jun18-08, 01:59 PM
HW Helper
P: 1,664
It is true that f2/f1 = v2/v1. But isn't the wave velocity equal to sqrt( T / mu ) ?
warmfire540
warmfire540 is offline
#9
Jun18-08, 02:27 PM
P: 55
Quote Quote by dynamicsolo View Post
It is true that f2/f1 = v2/v1. But isn't the wave velocity equal to sqrt( T / mu ) ?
Yeah..so we sub v for the sqrt( T / mu )

so f2/f1= sqrt( T2 / mu )/sqrt( T1 / mu )

1.0316=sqrt( T2 / mu )/sqrt( T1 / mu )

1.0642=(T2/mu) / (T1/mu)
1.0642=T2/T1

So T1*1.0642 = T2

This is a 93.98% difference between strings, where as the difference in percent is 6.02%
dynamicsolo
dynamicsolo is offline
#10
Jun18-08, 02:38 PM
HW Helper
P: 1,664
That is close, but be careful about the definition. The question asks for the percentage change in the tension of the wire. This will be

(delta_T / T) x 100% = [ (T2 - T1) / T1 ] x 100% .

The fractional change is equivalent to

(T2 - T1)/T1 = (T2/T1) - (T1/T1) = (T2/T1) - 1 = 1.0642 - 1 = 0.0642 .

So your percentage change should be 6.42% . (Or is 6.02% just a typo?)
warmfire540
warmfire540 is offline
#11
Jun19-08, 12:06 PM
P: 55
Quote Quote by dynamicsolo View Post
That is close, but be careful about the definition. The question asks for the percentage change in the tension of the wire. This will be

(delta_T / T) x 100% = [ (T2 - T1) / T1 ] x 100% .

The fractional change is equivalent to

(T2 - T1)/T1 = (T2/T1) - (T1/T1) = (T2/T1) - 1 = 1.0642 - 1 = 0.0642 .

So your percentage change should be 6.42% . (Or is 6.02% just a typo?)
Ah i See! thank you soo much!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Parallel RLC circuit: find resonant frequency and Input at that frequency Introductory Physics Homework 7
Frequency of a particle? Frequency of what? Quantum Physics 4
[SOLVED] Change in Tension & Fundamental Frequency of a String Introductory Physics Homework 2
Frequency output = sum of 2 frequency inputs (Digital) Electrical Engineering 9
Difference between applied tension and tension due to weight? Introductory Physics Homework 2