Woodshop teacher's ftl theory


by RuroumiKenshin
Tags: teacher, theory, woodshop
RuroumiKenshin
#1
May23-03, 08:16 PM
P: n/a
My woodshop teacher, who is a physics hobbyist, insists that by using magnitism to stretch time, we could travel faster than light.

I protested at the idea; but my explanations of how time doesn't matter much when it comes to ftl travel, and the fact that you need infinite energy failed to convince him. Besides, I don't see how 'stretching time' could allow for ftl travel.

To prove his hypothesis, he took one step, and claimed he traveled faster than light. Can anyone make sense out of this??
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
Mentat
Mentat is offline
#2
May23-03, 09:31 PM
P: 3,715
Originally posted by MajinVegeta
My woodshop teacher, who is a physics hobbyist, insists that by using magnitism to stretch time, we could travel faster than light.

I protested at the idea; but my explanations of how time doesn't matter much when it comes to ftl travel, and the fact that you need infinite energy failed to convince him. Besides, I don't see how 'stretching time' could allow for ftl travel.

To prove his hypothesis, he took one step, and claimed he traveled faster than light. Can anyone make sense out of this??
Well, as far as using magnetism to "stretch time", I'd have to hear some kind of idea as to how this could be accomplished.

As for that last comment (about his having traveled faster than light), I think he was either joking, or under some strange misconception.
schwarzchildradius
schwarzchildradius is offline
#3
May23-03, 10:49 PM
schwarzchildradius's Avatar
P: 179
I dont think so because the only contribution to bending spacetime that energy makes is small - m=E/c2 (or m=hf/c2), so 1 kilogram of matter bends space the same as a super-concentrated energy of 9x1016 joules. That'd be a lot of EM energy, such as having a bunch of H-bombs in a very small space.

Ivan Seeking
Ivan Seeking is offline
#4
May24-03, 04:03 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Ivan Seeking's Avatar
P: 12,493

Woodshop teacher's ftl theory


Originally posted by MajinVegeta
My woodshop teacher, who is a physics hobbyist, insists that by using magnitism to stretch time, we could travel faster than light.

I protested at the idea; but my explanations of how time doesn't matter much when it comes to ftl travel, and the fact that you need infinite energy failed to convince him. Besides, I don't see how 'stretching time' could allow for ftl travel.

To prove his hypothesis, he took one step, and claimed he traveled faster than light. Can anyone make sense out of this??
We do have ideas for warp drive using "Space Folding". I don't know of any magnetic [really electric anyway] connection, but the energy requirement may not be infinite to "avoid" the sol limitation.
Ivan Seeking
Ivan Seeking is offline
#5
May24-03, 08:44 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Ivan Seeking's Avatar
P: 12,493
Originally posted by MajinVegeta
To prove his hypothesis, he took one step, and claimed he traveled faster than light. Can anyone make sense out of this??
I think his point was: try to prove him wrong. He probably got this from KPAX. [a)] I suspect his point was the very paradox that you seek to resolve...and the fact that you are doing it [edit] means that he was successful!


Register to reply

Related Discussions
String theory ~ the theory of physical theory? Beyond the Standard Model 32
Applied mathematics of Game Theory overlooked as a representaiton in string theory? Beyond the Standard Model 0
total energy; confusion with teacher's statement Introductory Physics Homework 11
different answer from teacher's..... Introductory Physics Homework 1
Matrix string theory, contact terms, and superstring field theory Beyond the Standard Model 2