Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the methods used to ascertain rock erosion rates, particularly in relation to the Great Sphinx and other archaeological sites. Participants explore various dating techniques and the complexities involved in determining erosion processes, with a focus on geological and archaeological intersections.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Steve LeMaster inquires about the methods used to determine rock erosion rates, noting that Dr. Schoch believes this is not well understood by geologists.
- Some participants suggest that the variability in erosion processes complicates the ability to provide a simple answer.
- One method mentioned is subsurface seismic surveying, which was used by Professor Schoch in his work on the Great Sphinx.
- Another participant proposes using 10Be/26Al exposure dating as a potential method for determining erosion rates, questioning why this has not been done yet.
- There are references to the complexities surrounding the weathering of the Sphinx, with one participant describing it as a "can of worms" and a delicate mystery.
- Discussion includes skepticism about the dating of the Great Sphinx and its orientation, suggesting that these factors may warrant further investigation.
- Participants express interest in other archaeological sites, such as a megalithic site in Cuba, and the potential for future research there.
- One participant mentions that the erosion of the Sphinx may be linked to unexpected physical behaviors of terrestrial planets, though this connection remains unclear.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of views on the methods and theories related to rock erosion and dating. There is no consensus on the best approach or the validity of certain claims, indicating that multiple competing views remain in the discussion.
Contextual Notes
Participants acknowledge the limitations of current methods and the influence of various factors on erosion rates, but do not resolve these complexities or assumptions.
Who May Find This Useful
This discussion may be of interest to those studying geology, archaeology, or the history of ancient civilizations, as well as individuals curious about the methodologies used in dating and understanding erosion processes.
As a consequence this is a very slow moving forum.