Thread Closed

Georgian - South Ossetian - Russian Conflict

 
Share Thread
Aug15-08, 11:27 AM   #154
 

Georgian - South Ossetian - Russian Conflict


Quote by AhmedEzz View Post
just so that you guys know, i am not talking like madman or throwing accusations:
I think you sufficiently documented your earlier post as being an opinion.

But to address what I believe is the intent of your post, I believe that this whole scenario will strengthen US relations with the other former Soviet countries in the region.

Russia might think that they have "won" by including the right to stay in the country for 6 months to ensure security or whatnot, but the surrounding countries will certainly be watching. Any presence by the Russians over what those countries deem as a reasonable amount of time, will bring them closer to the US.
Aug15-08, 12:04 PM   #155
 
Quote by seycyrus View Post
Just because news sources that are well known for their past criticism of the Bush Admin. didn't immediately swallow everything that the state controlled russian media was putting out, they are labelled as biased.
But they were happy to swallow Saakhashvili's lies each time he spewed them. Headlines like "Russian tanks are coming" go well with US public. Any kind words toward Russia raise eyebrows. That's how I explain the bias.


Quote by seycyrus
I guess in a country with a population of 140 mil. everyone totally agrees on this issue! Ha!
You may be surprised but you won't find many Russians who disagree about this conflict. Trust me. Of course, even in the US there are wacko's who explain 9/11 as Bush conspiracy. I can imagine that similar type views (i.e., that present conflict was started by Putin) exist in Russia. But they are tiny minority.
Aug15-08, 12:21 PM   #156
 
Quote by meopemuk View Post
But they were happy to swallow Saakhashvili's lies each time he spewed them.
"Report" is not the same thing as "swallow".

Quote by meopemuk View Post
Headlines like "Russian tanks are coming" go well with US public.
Are there not tanks inside Georgian territory as we speak?

Quote by meopemuk View Post
Any kind words toward Russia raise eyebrows.
Nah. Kind words spoken by the russian controlled media in the absence of *any* criticism by that same media, raises eyebrows. As well it should.

Quote by meopemuk View Post
I can imagine that similar type views (i.e., that present conflict was started by Putin) exist in Russia. But they are tiny minority.
And to what media source do those who have these minority views go to, to express them, and see them printed or broadcast?

All over the "western media" I have seen anti-US allegations about the cause of this whole controversy.

Show me the analog, in the russian controlled media.
Aug15-08, 01:40 PM   #157
 
Quote by seycyrus View Post

And to what media source do those who have these minority views go to, to express them, and see them printed or broadcast?

All over the "western media" I have seen anti-US allegations about the cause of this whole controversy.

Show me the analog, in the russian controlled media.
I regularly browse Russian information websites, and I see all kind of stuff there including statements of Western leaders, links to CNN, BBC, Georgian press, etc. Russia does not try to block information (like China, for example). You probably think that Russia today is the same as Soviet Union 30 years ago. No, it isn't.

As for opponents to the current regime, the most vocal and pro-Western player is Garry Kasparov. He issued an "official statement" regarding these events.

http://www.theotherrussia.org/2008/0...ial-statement/

He does blame Russian leadership for inconsistent policy in the Caucasus, however, he does not deny that Georgian full-scale attack was the trigger:

"Why, after an attack on Russian peacekeepers by the superior forces of the opponent in Tskhinvali, did the official establishment stand in a state of stupor for several hours, and didn’t rush to provide military assistance?"

From what I heard, immediately after the attack, Russians tried to get a resolution of the UN Security Council in order to stop Georgians by diplomatic means. After this attempt failed, there was no other option but to use an overwhelming force.
Aug15-08, 02:26 PM   #158
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
"U.S. President George W. Bush accused Russia of bullying ex-Soviet Georgia, saying: "Bullying and intimidation are not acceptable ways to conduct foreign policy in the 21st century."

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/0...russia_georgia

This is an indication of either total hypocrisy or Alzheimer's Disease when you consider the tactics used to pull off the invasion of Iraq.
Aug15-08, 04:07 PM   #159
 
Mikhail Gorbatchev, talking with Larry King, puts the blame for the fighting on Georgia:

"This was the use of sophisticated weapons against a small town, against a sleeping people. This was a barbaric assault."

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/eu...hev/index.html
Aug15-08, 04:09 PM   #160
 
Mentor
Quote by baywax View Post
"U.S. President George W. Bush accused Russia of bullying ex-Soviet Georgia, saying: "Bullying and intimidation are not acceptable ways to conduct foreign policy in the 21st century."

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/0...russia_georgia

This is an indication of either total hypocrisy or Alzheimer's Disease when you consider the tactics used to pull off the invasion of Iraq.
He has a severe irony deficiency.
Aug15-08, 04:19 PM   #161
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by lisab View Post
He has a severe irony deficiency.
Aug15-08, 04:33 PM   #162
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
If you missed the Daily Show episode that first covered this conflict, you can thank me for this:

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/0...yre-in-europe/

Watch it - it's priceless!
Aug15-08, 04:53 PM   #163
 
Quote by seycyrus View Post
Any presence by the Russians over what those countries deem as a reasonable amount of time, will bring them closer to the US.
The truth of the matter is that Georgian army, police, and all authorities ran from Gori and Senaki leaving behing huge amount of ready-to-use military equipment, ammunition, etc. It would be insane to leave this area without any kind of supervision. Can you imagine if some angry person (and now there are many angry people in the area, both Georgians and Ossetians) decided to take a ride around the neighborhood in one of those tanks? I heard that Russians are exploding ammunition dumps in the area.

Another problem is that many Ossetian militiamen entered Georgia proper behind Russian army. They are not well educated on the rules of engagement and hardly obey anyone's orders. I don't think they deserve a lot of blame, because they simply took weapons to defend their families and homes. There are reports of looting. There could be some revenge killings as well. I also heard a report that Russian military commanders shot dead two looters. Nobody wants the Ossetia-Georgia border to become a site of mayhem, like in Bagdad after US invasion.

Just be patient. When the dust settles, Russians will transfer the control over to Georgian authorities. This would take a couple of days, I think. You'll continue hearing about "ceasefire violations" from the US media during this time. But it is better not to pay attention.
Aug15-08, 06:27 PM   #164
 
Did anybody post this yet?

Aug15-08, 06:48 PM   #165
 
You can find the Russian side of the story (in English) and a lot of video footage not shown by Western media on www.russiatoday.com
Aug15-08, 10:23 PM   #166
 
Quote by Art View Post
Having said that and not to take away from America's role it is very likely that all of Europe would have ended up under Stalinist Russia were it not for the US forces.
There is no such thing as a "Stalinist" to begin with. If you are referring to the political ideology used in the Soviet Union during Stalin's era, it's Marxism-Leninism.

Stalin was not the only one in power in the USSR. He was the general secretary of the party. There were many others involved as well but as you may know 'big guy always gets the sh*t...'
Aug15-08, 11:18 PM   #167
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus


According to McCain, this is the first serious international crisis since the end of the Cold War! Really? What does he consider the first Gulf War, Kosovo, 9/11, the Iraq War, the genocide in Darfur, the North Korean test firing of Taepodongs near Japanese waters, Israeli attacks in Lebanon and Iran's ongoing UN confrontation (let's even ignore the global food and fuel crises)?

And what's "Abskaiya"? Is it the territory in the north west corner of the country lead by the "US . . . educated . . . lawyer, Mikhail Sashkavili".
Aug16-08, 08:47 AM   #168
 
This just shows one why this MCcain cannot be a president. Is there anything coming from the office of Obama?
Aug16-08, 09:02 AM   #169
 
Admin
Q&A: Russia-Georgia Conflict Has Deep Roots
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=93525210

What triggered the current fighting?

It began as a series of sniper-fire incidents and clashes between the South Ossetian militia and Georgian army troops during the first week in August. By Aug. 7, Georgian President Saakashvili was charging that the South Ossetians were using heavy weapons that had been brought into the area in violation of the cease-fire. Civilians began to flee Tskhinvali, the town that serves as South Ossetia's capital. On Aug. 8, Saakashvili ordered Georgian troops to capture the city.

Russia responded with airstrikes on Georgian positions, not just in South Ossetia but also in Abkhazia, where Georgian troops still had a foothold in the Kodori Gorge region. Russia has said it is only seeking to restore stability to the two regions, but as its troops advanced out of the separatist regions into undisputed Georgian territory, President Bush accused Russia of seeking to crush the Georgian military and trigger the overthrow of Saakashvili's government.
Hmmm. How should a nation or law enforcement agency respond to sniper fire?

Abkhazia had a sizable population of ethnic Georgians who were forcibly expelled from the region during the fighting in the early 1990s. Human Rights Watch reported that the Abkhaz separatists committed widespread atrocities against Georgians, including massacres, rapes, torture and ethnic cleansing. The findings were corroborated in a 1994 country report from the U.S. State Department.

There are still pockets of ethnic Georgians living in South Ossetia, and Georgia asserts that it must protect them from the same fate.
How should this matter be resolved?


But then - Lack Of Western Action On Georgia Reflects History - Daniel Schorr
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=93510044
All Things Considered, August 11, 2008 · Western powers have so far failed to support Georgia in its conflict with Russia over the breakaway region of South Ossetia. It is the latest historical example of the failure of great powers to support little countries when the chips are down.
Aug16-08, 09:51 AM   #170
 
Mentor
Quote by Gokul43201 View Post
According to McCain, this is the first serious international crisis since the end of the Cold War! Really? What does he consider the first Gulf War, Kosovo, 9/11, the Iraq War, the genocide in Darfur, the North Korean test firing of Taepodongs near Japanese waters, Israeli attacks in Lebanon and Iran's ongoing UN confrontation (let's even ignore the global food and fuel crises)?
I probably would have chosen different words, but I see his point. None of those was serious enough that there was a risk of a lare war between nuclear superpowers.

The first Gulf War was probably the largest conflict since Vietnam in terms of the number of troops employed, but it was also relatively easy and manageable. One caveat, though: the Iraqi firing of Scuds at Israel was a somewhat serious situation because if Israel had responded, there was a possibility of the entire region erupting in conflict.

Those humanitarian conflicts are not serious in terms of their difficulty in dealing with them. We simply choose not to. I remember reading an analysis that the Rwanda conflict could have been stopped with a disturbingly small force. They are also not mostly not international crises.

Georgia is a US ally who is trying to get into NATO. If we're serious about our commitment to them, we should be sending troops there to fight the Russians. But we're not. Why?
Thread Closed

Similar Threads for: Georgian - South Ossetian - Russian Conflict
Thread Forum Replies
Russian History History & Humanities 1
what does this mean in english -Russian General Discussion 34
Russian Plane Aerospace Engineering 4
Russian Tragedy Current Events 23
The Russian Problems Current Events 2