Fuzzy probability/intuition problem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jammieg
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a probability problem involving a garage door installer and a dent on the metal paneling reported by Mrs. Banks. The installer has a documented error rate of 1 mistake per 5 installations, with 10% of those mistakes being unnoticed. Mrs. Banks is 80% confident that the installer caused the dent, while her husband has a 1 in 3 chance of being 80% sure of the same. The overall probability that the Bankses will conclude the installer is responsible is calculated to be 37%.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic probability theory
  • Familiarity with conditional probability
  • Knowledge of Bayesian inference
  • Ability to analyze statistical claims
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Bayesian inference techniques for real-world applications
  • Explore advanced probability problems involving multiple variables
  • Learn about error rates in practical scenarios, such as quality control
  • Investigate the psychology of decision-making under uncertainty
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, mathematicians, decision analysts, and anyone interested in probability theory and its applications in real-life scenarios.

jammieg
A garaged door installer installs a door for Mrs. Banks one day and after completing the job she checks it out to find that it looks great except for a small dent on the metal panelling on the outside of the building, approximately 10 cm away from the garage door, she insists that the dent was not there this morning but is not certain. The door installer claim that he doesn't recall that happening and if it did he wasn't aware of it. She says she will ask her husband later if he made the dent or remebers it before the installer came.
Setting aside the motto the customer is always right here are some arbitrary facts:
The installer makes 1 mistake every 5 doors installed and of those 1 out of 10 he is unaware of the mistake.
Mrs. Banks is not sure of herself let's say she is 80% sure the installer did it and 20% it was caused by someone or something else.
Before Mr. Banks is consulted there is a 1 in 3 chance of he also being 80% sure the installer did it, but a 2 in 3 chance of being 80% sure he did not do it.
If the combined total sureness of the two are 80% or greater on some particular outcome they will believe the installer did it.

What are the overall odds that in the morning the installer will get a call from the Bankses saying they think the installer was responsible?

The answer is entirely up for debate this is an orginal problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution I got was a 37% probability the Bankses will call.
Ok that one's way too easy, and I'm wrong anyway. What I meant was what is the probability the installer is guilty, oh well silly problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
9K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
10K