Reexamination of fundamental mathematical concepts

[WWW]

Hi,

In the attached address ( http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/M_E.pdf ) you can find my reexamination of fundamental mathematical concepts.

Please read all of it before you air your view about it.

Thank you,

WWW

 

[Janitor]

Where is Matt Grime these days?

 

[pallidin]

My thoughts... your theory fails by virture of its foundation.

To say that "x" defines "something" but also that "x" defines "nothing" renders further mathematical analysis under those conditions impossible.
It's much like my saying that "x" equals "1" but also equals "0" , so any equations using that standard can be multi-interpreted, thus rendering those equations invalid, pointless and of no use.

 

[WWW]

Hi pallidin,

Can you see beyond the 0 XOR 1 excluded-middle reasoning?

In this pdf I use an included-middle reasoning where x is a GENERAL notation for any concept.

If you try to force the excluded-middle reasoning on what is written in my pdf, then you don't give yourself any chance to be able to understand it.

So, please give youself the chance, put aside your excluded-middle reasoning and try to read it again with an open mind until the end of it, before you air your view about it.

Thank you,

WWW

 

[PFanalog57]

Can you see beyond the 0 XOR 1 excluded-middle reasoning?

What is the stratification of relations in your system?

 

[WWW]

Hi Russell E. Rierson,

You can start with this http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/BFC.pdf

and if it is still not understood then please read this:

http://us.share.geocities.com/complementarytheory/OrganicMathematics.pdf

Thank you,

WWW