Thermocouple to measure the temperature of glass

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the appropriateness and accuracy of using thermocouples to measure the temperature of glass within the range of 20-300°C. Participants explore various aspects of thermocouple functionality, calibration, and accuracy in relation to their temperature measurement capabilities.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether using a thermocouple for measuring glass temperature is appropriate given its broader range, suggesting that this may affect accuracy.
  • Others argue that staying within the thermocouple's specified range allows for reliable data, noting that calibration curves can be linear in certain regions.
  • There is a discussion about the different types of thermocouples (K, J, E, N, T, R, S, B) and their respective temperature ranges, with some participants asserting that a wider range can lead to reduced accuracy.
  • One participant challenges the analogy between thermocouples and tire gauges, emphasizing that thermocouples produce a voltage proportional to temperature, which is then measured, and that linear response in the region of interest is crucial.
  • Concerns are raised about the distinction between accuracy and resolution, with some suggesting that all instruments have inherent inaccuracies, and the degree of error varies.
  • Some participants propose that resistance thermometers may offer better accuracy for the specified temperature range compared to thermocouples.
  • There is a mention of the complexity of thermocouple usage, particularly regarding the need for sensitive and stable voltage sources for accurate measurements.
  • One participant references a source that indicates thermocouples are non-linear and provides details about the complexities of their calibration and response curves.
  • Another participant shares personal experience using K-type thermocouples and expresses skepticism about the clarity of information provided by manufacturers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the accuracy and appropriateness of thermocouples for measuring glass temperature. While some support their use within specified ranges, others highlight potential inaccuracies and suggest alternatives. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the accuracy of thermocouples can depend on various factors, including the specific type of thermocouple used, the calibration method, and the measurement setup. There are references to the complexity of thermocouple response curves and the potential for non-linear behavior, which may affect measurements.

c1a3m1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is it wrong to use a thermocouple to mesure the temperature of glass that will range from 20-300oC? as the range of the thermocouple is much higher, does this make it inaccurate? :confused:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
no, staying well within the upper and lower bounds of the devices range alows you to be more comfortable with the data. I.e. there usually is a linear portion of the calibration curve...
 
Depending on what type thermocouple you are talking about as there are various types (k,j,e,n,t,r,s,b) they all have different ranges, type k being typically around -200 deg.c to +1200 deg.c and yes, you're right , the greater the range of the measuring instrument, the less accuracy you will have. That's one of the reasons why that in engineering, the calculations need to be accurate.
Think of it like you need to put 10 PSI in your bike tyres but the pressure gauge your using to measure it is 0 - 1000 PSI. Wouldn't it be wiser to use a gauge with a range of about 0 - 20 PSI? Then you have the resolution.

Hope this helps
 
Sam,
I do not think that a thermocouple is analogous to a tire gage. The thermocouple produces a voltage which is proportional to the temperature, you then use a meter to measure that voltage. Your gage is like the meter, the thermocouple is the device being measured. The key issue is, as mentioned above, that you use a thermocouple which has linear response in your region of interest.

http://www.omega.com/prodinfo/thermocouple.html is an excellent resource for temperature measurement questions. They have very good technical reference available and sell (at a price!) everything you need to measure about anything.
 
Integral, you missed my point. What i was trying to explain was that if the measuring instrument is of a much higher range (say, +200%) then you start to lose accuracy.The tyre gauge example was just a way of explaining.
And yes, you're right about measuring the millivolt output with a multimeter but you will only get an output if the 2 junctions are at different temperatures.Also, if the hot junction is in the process and the cj is at ambient, then the corrected output is the difference between the two.
Hope this clears things up.
 
Integral said:
Sam,
...you use a thermocouple which has linear response in your region of interest.
on an exponential curve? surely you refer to the indication system (thermocouple and indicator), the pair may have linearity limits?

sam024 said:
the greater the range of the measuring instrument, the less accuracy you will have.
Are we confusing accuracy with resolution?

c1a3m1 said:
...range from 20-300oC? as the range of the thermocouple is much higher, does this make it inaccurate?
Every instrument is inaccurate ? only the magnitude of the error varies.
If you want the best accuracy then you could consider a resistance thermometer as these are generally considered to be better for this kind of temperature range.
Thermocouples are fine if you have a decent indicator - the question now becomes ... "what kind of accuracy do you want?"
 
mechie said:
on an exponential curve? surely you refer to the indication system (thermocouple and indicator), the pair may have linearity limits?


Are we confusing accuracy with resolution?


Every instrument is inaccurate ? only the magnitude of the error varies.
If you want the best accuracy then you could consider a resistance thermometer as these are generally considered to be better for this kind of temperature range.
Thermocouples are fine if you have a decent indicator - the question now becomes ... "what kind of accuracy do you want?"
The response charts I see for T/C is very nearly linear for large portions of the temperature range. None look exponential. Could you please provide a reference? (See my Omega link.) a T/C requires a very sensitive and stable voltage source for a reference (this can be used in place of a second junction and good millivolt meter for the measurement. In this respect they can be a bit hard for a home hobbyist to use. Though you can buy (for a price) temperature compensated temperature controllers which very easy to use.
 
I followed the Omega link but it appears to me that the manufacturers are trying to bamboozle me with science! I find little useable information here, only 'screen clutter'. However...
On the first page of their "introduction to practical temperature measurements" is a table listing merits of various temp. measurement techniques; thermocouples are listed as non-linear

On page z-26 of their "using thermocouples" pdf is a graph of various thermocouple response curves.

This (attached) formula is that for 'K' type thermocouples and for positive temperatures ONLY.
This is as specified by the UK National Physics Laboratory as a simplification suitable for computer calculations to about 0.1 degree C.

The full calculation (as per BS EN 60584.1) gives polynomial functions with between four and fourteen terms, with constants given to eleven significant figures.
My reference is www.tc.co.uk, they do an excellent (and free :smile: ) wall chart of tc look-up tables.

I agree that thermocouples aren't the easiest things to use but given the gear (and there is no clear statement in c1a3m1's original posting as to what is available or where the measurement is taking place) I wouldn't rule them out - I use 'K' type thermocouples at home :cool: with a commercial 3.5 digit temperature meter.

To give an answer to the original posting I would still say
"Every instrument is inaccurate ? only the magnitude of the error varies".

ps. I gave up trying to use LaTex to display the formula, I couldn't get it to show anythig but my source text :cry:
 

Attachments

  • Thermocouple_uV_calc.gif
    Thermocouple_uV_calc.gif
    753 bytes · Views: 726
surely depending upon the type of thermocouple.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K