Space Genetics: A Weird Physics Theory on Mass, Radiation, and the Universe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter heusdens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genetics Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a theory referred to as "Space genetics," proposed by a Russian physicist known as Dr. Dark Energy. This theory suggests that mass consumes space while radiation from stars creates space, leading to a universe that is in perfect equilibrium, finite in size but with an infinite history. The scope includes theoretical implications and critiques of the model.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Dr. Dark Energy is not a professional physicist and adheres to a static/steady state model, which has been largely rejected by the scientific community.
  • Others clarify that Dr. Dark Energy's model is not precisely the same as the traditional static/steady state model, as he explicitly rejects the Big Bang theory.
  • Participants express a desire for arguments against the theory, indicating a willingness to engage in critical analysis.
  • There is a call for others to contribute their thoughts or critiques regarding the theory, with one participant questioning if another has read the theory in detail.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the theory, and multiple competing views remain regarding its acceptance and the critiques of it.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of terms used in the theory and the assumptions underlying the claims made by Dr. Dark Energy. The rejection of the Big Bang model by the theorist is also a point of contention.

heusdens
Messages
1,736
Reaction score
0
Here is a link to weird physics theory, called "Space genetics" by some russian physiscts (Dr. Dark Energy), who has a theory in which mass "consumes" space, and radiation by stars "creates" back the space consumed by mass...creating in fact a universe in perfect equilibrium of finite size but with infinite history.

http://www.geocities.com/igorelik/index.html".

Anyone wanting to comment on this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Just be aware that as you read his theory that he is not a professional physicist and that he adheres to the static/steady state model of the universe which has been rejected by the majority of professionals.
 
He was/is a physics teacher.
 
Originally posted by Phobos
Just be aware that as you read his theory that he is not a professional physicist and that he adheres to the static/steady state model of the universe which has been rejected by the majority of professionals.

It's not precisely a static/steady state model, at least not the based on the cosmological theory that was called "static/steady state" model. Although he clearly rejects the Big Bang model.

But come with arguments, why is his theory wrong?
 
Originally posted by heusdens
But come with arguments, why is his theory wrong?

Good question. If I have time, I'll try to comment on it soon. Anyone else?
 
Originally posted by Phobos
Good question. If I have time, I'll try to comment on it soon. Anyone else?
Hubble?
 
Originally posted by russ_watters
Hubble?

Have you actually READ the theory of space genetics?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K