Thread Closed

Equation of a plane (General and Point-Normal Form)

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Nov1-08, 02:48 PM   #1
 

Equation of a plane (General and Point-Normal Form)


Hey all,
I'm trying to figure out an example from my Linear Algebra Book:

The question is as follows:
Find the equation of the plane passing through the points P1(1,2,-1), P2(2,3,1) and P3(3,-1,2)

It goes on to say it must satisfy this system, which is fine:

1 + 2b - c + d = 0
2a + 3b + c + d = 0
3a - b + 2c + d = 0

Then it just says, "solving for this system gives [tex]a=\frac{9}{16}t, b=-\frac{1}{16}t, c= \frac{5}{16}t, d=t[/tex] "

To solve this system, would one include the d's in the matrix or leave them out?
What method would you recommend for solving this? (and then I can give it a shot)

Thanks in advance!
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'
>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements
>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
Nov3-08, 05:22 AM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
You forgot to mention that you are assuming the equation of the plane (or any plane) can be written ax+ by+ cz+ d= 0! I wondered where a, b, c, and d came from!

Yes, of course you have to include d! You have to include all the variables. The equations you give are equivalent to
2b- c+ d= -1
2a+ 3b+ c+ d= 0
3a- b+ 2c+ d= 0
The augmented matrix for that system of equations is
[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}0 & 2 & -1 & 1 & -1 \\ 2 & 3 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 3 & -1 & 1 & 1 & 0\end{array}\right][/tex]
Nov3-08, 02:16 PM   #3
 
Am I correct in thinking the Gaussian elimination would be the best choice, or is there a more efficient way I'm missing?
Nov3-08, 05:58 PM   #4
 

Equation of a plane (General and Point-Normal Form)


I recommend you instead use the point-normal form instead.

To find the normal, you can take the cross product n = (p2-p1)X(p3-p2). Then the condition that the normal is perpendicular to vectors on the plane means that (x-c)*n = 0 for points x and c on the plane.

Here is a diagram:
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/7...malformpy3.png
Nov4-08, 10:22 AM   #5
 
Awesome, Maze! But where does the 1/16 come from then?
Nov4-08, 10:46 AM   #6
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
Have you tried
1) Solving the system of equations?
2) Reducing the matrix I gave you?
3) Taking the cross product as Maze suggested?

Doing any of those things will show you where the "1/16" came from. The point is that you have three equations in 4 unknown coefficients. You can solve for any three in terms of the other one. Here they chose to solve for a, b, c in terms of d and use d as the parametr.

Actually, it doesn't matter. If you define s to be "t/16", then, a= 9s, b= -s, c= 5s and d= 16s.
Nov4-08, 10:50 AM   #7
 
Yes! Doing the cross product I obtained (9,1,-5), lacking the denominator I need.
Nov4-08, 11:30 AM   #8
 
Hmm. heres what i get
p1=(1,2,1), p2=(2,3,1), p3 = (3,-1,2)

p2-p1=(1,1,0), p3-p2=(1,-4,1)

n = (p2-p1)X(p3-p2) = i(1-0) + j(0-1) + k(-4-1) = (1,-1,-5)

0 = n*(x-p1) = (1,-1,-5)*(x1-1, x2-2, x3-1) = x1-1-x2+2-5*x3+5
0 = x1 - x2 - 5*x3 + 6

This checks out with the 3 points, so it should be good.
Nov4-08, 12:40 PM   #9
 
Hey Maze,
sorry, I'm not following your last two steps.

What I did is set it up as a 2x3 matrix and solved for the three components.
I used the easy method of "crossing" out a column and then finding the three determinants.

This gives me the three numbers from before, but not the 1/16th...
Nov4-08, 01:04 PM   #10
 
Maybe it will be easier to help if you can post your work so far.
Nov4-08, 01:28 PM   #11
 
Sure,

I'm just using a trick from my linear algebra book:

taking the cross product of a 2x3

1 1 0
1 -4 1

The trick is, to get the x portion, cross out the first column and take the determinant. For the y, cross out the second column, for the z, cross out the third.

The three determinants I get are 9, 1, -5
Nov4-08, 02:00 PM   #12
 
Recheck the determinants,
[tex]det(\begin{matrix}1 & 0 \\ -4 & 1\end{matrix}) = 1*1-(-4*0) = 1[/tex]
Nov4-08, 02:13 PM   #13
 
Wait, sorry - I accidentally used your value. The first row should be 1 1 2.

(P1 is 1,2, -1)

Using that, I get the values I showed.
Nov4-08, 02:34 PM   #14
 
Yeah ok with p1 = (1,2,-1) that looks good. So whats the problem then?
Nov4-08, 08:39 PM   #15
 
Is there a problem with doing it my way, as I do not get the 1/16th still... or am I forgetting something?
Nov4-08, 09:34 PM   #16
 
Oh, i see. Just recall

ax + by + c = 0

is the same as

ax/16 + bx/16 + c/16 = 0
Nov4-08, 09:46 PM   #17
 
I'm confused...

when I wrote the solutions with 1/16th in my first post - that came from an unsolved answer in the book. I do not know how its obtained solving for my determinants,etc.
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Equation of a plane (General and Point-Normal Form)
Thread Forum Replies
Equation of plane through point P containing line L Calculus & Beyond Homework 5
Find Cartesian equation of plane containging line with parametric equations and point Precalculus Mathematics Homework 3
the equation of a plane perpendicular to a vector and passing through a given point? Calculus 7
Question about the General form to normal form of Diff Eq Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
General Form of Circle Equation General Math 13