| Thread Closed |
Contemplation does not strictly belong to man? |
Share Thread |
| Nov7-08, 09:42 PM | #1 |
|
|
Contemplation does not strictly belong to man?
If we take "man" to mean homo sapien....
Isn't it true that other past primate species, perhaps homo habilis, contemplated their existence? I seem to remember reading something about focilized remains being found with flowers laid in the grave, paintings, etc... So was homo sapien the only species to ever contemplate their exitence? |
| Nov7-08, 10:04 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Looking beyond homos, elephants realize that they are looking at themselves if there is a mirror nearby, and they grieve and have elaborate mourning rituals if one of their clan dies.
|
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Contemplation does not strictly belong to man?
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| derivation of Lorentz force Law strictly from maxwell's equations? | Classical Physics | 28 | ||
| Is Martingale difference sequence strictly stationary and ergodic? | Calculus | 1 | ||
| Is Martingale difference sequence strictly stationary and ergodic? | General Math | 0 | ||
| Mom and Dad, you belong together... | General Discussion | 6 | ||