Thread Closed

Contemplation does not strictly belong to man?

 
Share Thread
Nov7-08, 09:42 PM   #1
 

Contemplation does not strictly belong to man?


If we take "man" to mean homo sapien....

Isn't it true that other past primate species, perhaps homo habilis, contemplated their existence? I seem to remember reading something about focilized remains being found with flowers laid in the grave, paintings, etc...

So was homo sapien the only species to ever contemplate their exitence?
PhysOrg.com social sciences news on PhysOrg.com

>> New language discovery reveals linguistic insights
>> Throwing the bum out: When should scandal-hit politicians stage a come back?
>> Fathers work the hardest, but not as hard as they used to?
Nov7-08, 10:04 PM   #2
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Looking beyond homos, elephants realize that they are looking at themselves if there is a mirror nearby, and they grieve and have elaborate mourning rituals if one of their clan dies.
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: Contemplation does not strictly belong to man?
Thread Forum Replies
derivation of Lorentz force Law strictly from maxwell's equations? Classical Physics 28
Is Martingale difference sequence strictly stationary and ergodic? Calculus 1
Is Martingale difference sequence strictly stationary and ergodic? General Math 0
Mom and Dad, you belong together... General Discussion 6