am i correct with bolzano Weierstrass lim inf/sup definition..


by transgalactic
Tags: bolzano, correct, definition, inf or sup, weierstrass
transgalactic
transgalactic is offline
#1
Dec14-08, 05:25 AM
P: 1,399
i am given a bounded function
[itex]
y_n
[/itex]
by the law of bolzano Weierstrass
there has to be a sub sequence which converges.
[itex]
y_n_k
[/itex]

why ??
[itex]
lim sup y_n=>lim y_n_k
n-> infinity
[/itex]

lim sup is the supremum of the limits group of Xn
supremum is the least upper bound.so its bigger then any limit of a subsequence

correct?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Internet co-creator Cerf debunks 'myth' that US runs it
Astronomical forensics uncover planetary disks in Hubble archive
Solar-powered two-seat Sunseeker airplane has progress report

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Correct definition of planetary precession General Astronomy 0
Bolzano-Weierstrss Theorem Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Correct Definition? General Physics 30
Weierstrass M-test Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem Calculus & Beyond Homework 5