Some very helpful links Labguy!
|
When astronomers study the Milky Way, they can learn about the birth, life and death of its stars because they see the stars at various evolutionary stages. Detailed studies of the ages and chemical compositions of these stars suggest that the Milky Way has led a relatively quiet existence, forming stars at a rate of a few suns per year for about the last 10 billion years.
|
So over a time scale of about 10 billion years our galaxy should form around 30 or 40 billion stars, not to mention recent observation of increased star production in early galaxies.
This and occasional collisions and cannibalism, contribute to galaxies of ever increasing sizes. But why is it we don’t see galaxies on the really enormous scales?
Would it be possible that gravitational strengths influence the relative size of a galaxy? The bulk or the core of a galaxy acting similarly to a sun in a solar system, the combined gravitational force can only capture a certain number of stars, so even when mergers do occur, a galaxy can’t just keep adding to it’s mass exponentially?